RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel'

RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

pahunkboy -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 6:35:50 AM)
Ken, I think the states can handle regulations all by their self. We do not need soviet central power. such power can not last - for it is top heavy and will fall. How many states rights are there? NONE! The states have to sue the fed to have stricter or lighter rules. This is not self rule. It is not self determination. It is not freedom. It is not liberty. But you know what? Short of a nuclear bomb the states WILL SECEDE in my lifetime. It could be as many as 7 regions. The folks will actually be better off this way. We the people WILL BE GREATER this way. Wether you like it or not, the revolution has started.

Truthiness -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 7:12:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen That's just wrong. Ron Paul has repeatedly introduced federal legislation that would have criminalized accidental miscarriage and made all abortion first degree murder and force all states to treat it as such. Umm... "the federal government has no authority whatsoever to involve itself in the abortion issue." - Ron Paul. Looking up this legislation, one sees that Ron Paul introduced the "Sanctity of Life Act" which defines life as starting at conception, but doesn't force the states to treat anything as first degree murder. You're vastly exaggerating Ron Paul's positions/legislation.

kittinSol -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 7:22:09 AM)
Are you a bloke, Truthiness?

SilverMark -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 7:23:01 AM)
The Revolution has started?.....and no one told Me?..... Damn! Wonder which side I am on?...is it South vs. North again?.... East vs. West?...has Vegas succeeded yet?... Where's that gun thread maybe I need to buy one? No one ever tells me anything!

DomKen -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 8:12:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Truthiness quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen That's just wrong. Ron Paul has repeatedly introduced federal legislation that would have criminalized accidental miscarriage and made all abortion first degree murder and force all states to treat it as such. Umm... "the federal government has no authority whatsoever to involve itself in the abortion issue." - Ron Paul. Looking up this legislation, one sees that Ron Paul introduced the "Sanctity of Life Act" which defines life as starting at conception, but doesn't force the states to treat anything as first degree murder. You're vastly exaggerating Ron Paul's positions/legislation. I've read the actual bill. Making life start at conception means intentionally ending that life is first degree murder. The states would have no options. Don't believe what he claims about the bill, read the bill and consult with a decent constitutional scholar if you still don't see how it doesn't do what he claims it does.

Truthiness -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 10:32:48 AM)
I've read the bill too. It opens the door for further legislation that could do what you claim, but doesn't do it in and of itself.

DomKen -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 3:34:50 PM)
Here's the relevant text quote: SEC. 2. FINDING AND DECLARATION. (a) Finding- The Congress finds that present day scientific evidence indicates a significant likelihood that actual human life exists from conception. (b) Declaration- Upon the basis of this finding, and in the exercise of the powers of the Congress-- (1) the Congress declares that-- (A) human life shall be deemed to exist from conception, without regard to race, sex, age, health, defect, or condition of dependency; and (B) the term `person' shall include all human life as defined in subparagraph (A); and So a fertilized egg is a legal person and receives all the rights and protections of any other person, see 14th ammendment. Therefore medical abortion is first degree murder and must be treated exactly like any other murder, see 14th ammendment again. Therefore as I previously stated Paul's claims are simply lies. His bill would give states no options at all in dealing with abortion.

celticlord2112 -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 3:39:10 PM)
quote: Therefore as I previously stated Paul's claims are simply lies. His bill would give states no options at all in dealing with abortion. Quite wrong. It would, in fact, move the debate onto an ethically sound basis, unlike the sham ethics imposed by Roe v. Wade. Abortion itself could still be legislated as permissible by the states.

DomKen -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 3:41:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote: Therefore as I previously stated Paul's claims are simply lies. His bill would give states no options at all in dealing with abortion. Quite wrong. It would, in fact, move the debate onto an ethically sound basis, unlike the sham ethics imposed by Roe v. Wade. Abortion itself could still be legislated as permissible by the states. No. The 14th ammendment would preclude any legislation allowing for the definition of a class of people which it would be lawful to kill. Go find an actual lawyer and get him to tell you what that section means.

kittinSol -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 3:55:21 PM)
As a woman... as a foreign woman, accustomed to liberated medicine... I am getting increasinbly horrified at the will to curtail my rights, and those of my sisters, for the benefit of political gain. I cannot believe that today, in the XXIst century, people are still arguing that their ideology should prevail over my rights, and over what I should do with my womb. Enough, enough, ENOUGH. Ron Paul and all the others... leave us and our wombs alone, and deal with your own lives. I don't want you in MINE.

kidwithknife -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 4:08:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 Quite wrong. It would, in fact, move the debate onto an ethically sound basis, unlike the sham ethics imposed by Roe v. Wade. Abortion itself could still be legislated as permissible by the states. Either way, it still accepts the premise that the state (big states, little states, they're still states) should have the right to control women's bodies. That's not a libertarian position. But that would be because Ron Paul isn't really a libertarian, he's a conservative with economically libertarian views. And yes, I know the Libertarian Party supported him. But the statists took the LP over years ago.

pahunkboy -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 5:12:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Can I make a suggestion? Get laid man. Do something, anything. You are spending time listening to and reading BS by peddlers of conspiracy and paranoia and you're starting to sound as crazy as realone did. http://www.thatminoritything.com/?p=127226 here is a musical on prop 8. now that you mention it - I have been sexually charged this week.

cjan -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/5/2008 5:19:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote: Therefore as I previously stated Paul's claims are simply lies. His bill would give states no options at all in dealing with abortion. Quite wrong. It would, in fact, move the debate onto an ethically sound basis, unlike the sham ethics imposed by Roe v. Wade. Abortion itself could still be legislated as permissible by the states. Roe vs Wade imposes nothing. It simply allows women a choice. In many cases, a choice between legal, medically sound procedures vs the back alley quacks of the not so distant pass.

pahunkboy -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 4:42:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SilverMark The Revolution has started?.....and no one told Me?..... Damn! Wonder which side I am on?...is it South vs. North again?.... East vs. West?...has Vegas succeeded yet?... Where's that gun thread maybe I need to buy one? No one ever tells me anything! Where are you preparationwise? 10,000 people who attended the Ron Paul rally, which was a bigger event then the GOP, .... the fight is self determination vs the new world order. under the new world order, you are not a person. you are an animal to be chipped, tracked and exploited. what do you need to happen to realize this? the time for setting policy tho has passed. the spiral out to the bottem has started. during the depression, a few countries still had the gold standard...not so this time. what do you think that 11 bail outs mean? the gutting of the constitution? people who have their money swindled rise up and commit terrorism. the war on terror is against you my dear friend. wake up. it is easy to critique it. to go with no food for 30 days, and the public mind will then be tuned in. of course at that point, nothing can help the individual.

SilverMark -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 1:03:19 PM)
I think a lot of things....none have to do with a revolution inside the United States. I put no credence in the hysteria that a convicted felon and political cultist like your hero Larouche and others can create. They are simple architects of fear, and the more people feed into it them the more they propagate all the BS that some buy into and others do not....guess which one I am?

Musicmystery -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 1:29:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol As a woman... as a foreign woman, accustomed to liberated medicine... I am getting increasinbly horrified at the will to curtail my rights, and those of my sisters, for the benefit of political gain. I cannot believe that today, in the XXIst century, people are still arguing that their ideology should prevail over my rights, and over what I should do with my womb. Enough, enough, ENOUGH. Ron Paul and all the others... leave us and our wombs alone, and deal with your own lives. I don't want you in MINE. Ah, Conservatives..... Government should get out of our lives.....except for the areas where they should dominate our lives...... And they say this with straight faces.

Lorr47 -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 4:15:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SilverMark The Revolution has started?.....and no one told Me?..... Damn! Wonder which side I am on?...is it South vs. North again?.... East vs. West?...has Vegas succeeded yet?... Where's that gun thread maybe I need to buy one? No one ever tells me anything! Since Blackwater made the largest purchase of small arms ammunition by a private party in history may I suggest you really arm yourself. I know the only licensed seller of machine guns in Western Michigan. He lives.........oh oh. He lives in the same county that Prince is from. Don't you just love it when they all know each other. Cozy.

Musicmystery -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 4:20:09 PM)
Why is it that so many folks have theories about how industries are playing us, but no one ever suspects the gun industry? Oh yeah. They're just in business because of their belief in the Second Amendment. Same as the media and religion exist for their belief in the First Amendment. P. T. Barnum was right--"There's a sucker born every minute."

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 4:20:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SilverMark The Revolution has started?.....and no one told Me?..... Damn! Wonder which side I am on?...is it South vs. North again?.... East vs. West?...has Vegas succeeded yet?... Where's that gun thread maybe I need to buy one? No one ever tells me anything! I'm starting a chapter of the Weather Underground. All I need is a copy of "The Anarchists Cookbook". [8D]

kidwithknife -> RE: Ron Paul interview by John Stozel' (12/6/2008 4:24:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster All I need is a copy of "The Anarchists Cookbook". [8D] I wouldn't. The only person you'll be in danger of blowing up with the AC is yourself. Um, or so I've heard. I haven't read it or anything. shifty eyes

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2026

Terms of Service

0.046875