Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

National Security


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> National Security Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
National Security - 11/1/2008 6:17:19 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
Call me paranoid
 
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." ~Barack Obama
 
An internal military-strength state security force?
 
K.
 
 
 

< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/1/2008 6:18:39 PM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:25:08 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
Sounds like he means a errm what do you call it oh yes "National guard."
 
You all have your guns anyway so you are half way there all you need next is someone to shoot.

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:28:48 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
I d0nt want the government to fix any more problems!

but ya know- when bernacki spoke,  we bowed at his feet.   you dont honestly think that one or the other[mccain or obama] would not bow to those forces?

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:29:55 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

Sounds like he means a errm what do you call it oh yes "National guard."

Sounds like you errm don't know what you're talking about.
 
The National Guard is a reserve force of the US Army.
 
K.
 
 

< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/1/2008 6:31:41 PM >

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:35:32 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline

You show an tiny extract of a speech and you read all kinds of things into it? Get a grip is the best advise for paranoia. What exactly was you talking about this time, a possible police state if Obama wins?
 

< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 11/1/2008 6:36:41 PM >


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:37:45 PM   
candystripper


Posts: 3486
Joined: 11/1/2005
Status: offline
Well, from what I read, which admittedly were only exerpts from the speech, Obama wants to expand both AmeriCorps and the Peace Corps, as well as offer incentives to high school and college aged people to perform community service.  Apparently McCain has similar, though less optimistic, goals.
 
I didn't find it alarming when I read the what he said in context...but man, that You Tube outake is scarey.  It sounds as if he wants the nutters in the 'militias' around Idaho to start taking over!
 
http://bulletin.aarp.org/states/il/articles/obama_outlines_plan_for_national_service.html
 
By the way, the speech was given back in the summer....so why the alarm bells months later?
 
candystripper 

< Message edited by candystripper -- 11/1/2008 6:39:33 PM >

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:40:11 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
The TA is much like the national guard made up of dedicated civilian part timers, sounds to me the speech was about better funding for that national guard but it's hard to judge from a twenty second clip don't you think?

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:40:11 PM   
BlackPhx


Posts: 3432
Joined: 11/8/2006
Status: offline
They are..and many have been shipped over seas, leaving the POLICE Force, the FBI, NSA The Coast Guard and Homeland Security to guard our coastlines and handle security. Both the Coast Guard and the Police Force are hurting budget wise and it is a sad commentary that Gangs, Drug Dealers and crooks have better armament, equipment and vest than the Police Force does.

He's right. They do need to be stronger and better funded. Maybe then we could call for the police and not get a busy signal or a we will get a car there as soon as possible.

poenkitten

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:41:15 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
lol- abit late to worry about police state tactic in the USA>   LOLOL

(in reply to candystripper)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:42:10 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

You show an tiny extract of a speech and you read all kinds of things into it? Get a grip is the best advise for paranoia. What exactly was you talking about this time, a possible police state if Obama wins?

Try to focus on the question mark at the end of the sentence. I have no freaking idea what he means. I just know he's talking stuff that could mean anything, and doesn't sound to me like anything good. If you know what he's talking about, say so.

K.
 

< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/1/2008 7:02:53 PM >

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:42:21 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Call me paranoid
 
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." ~Barack Obama
 
An internal military-strength state security force?
 
K.

You're paranoid.

You're also taking 20 seconds of a July 4th speech out of context.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:48:49 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
Try to focus on the question mark at the end of the sentence. I have no freaking idea what he means. I just know he's talking stuff that could mean anything, and doesn't sound to me like it means anything good. If you know what he's talking about, say so. If you don't know, let's have less abusive and irrelevant comments.
 
K.

The question you asked seemed rhetorical to me I'm more interested in why you asked it.
 
Sorry you felt my response was abusive.


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:50:34 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You're also taking 20 seconds of a July 4th speech out of context.

Excuse me, but I am not taking the quote out of context. Whoever posted the video did that. Whether or not the context would comfort me is another matter. Would you care to provide clarification based on your knowledge of it?
 
K.
 

< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/1/2008 6:59:57 PM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 6:58:05 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

The question you asked seemed rhetorical to me I'm more interested in why you asked it.

No, it wasn't rhetorical. But your interest in why I asked may be paranoid. I answered that question in the post you are responding to.

Note: I edited the post to remove the peckish comment, and again for grammar (it's a habit).
 
K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/1/2008 7:05:40 PM >

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 7:05:27 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

all you need next is someone to shoot.

That's never hard to find.  Trick is to find the justification for the shooting (always better to have that BEFORE you pull the trigger.  Saves money on lawyers and vaseline later).


_____________________________



(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 7:09:53 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
So I hear.

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 7:10:13 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
They get vaseline in the Big House?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 7:11:40 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
Beats me.  I've always had my justifications in order.

_____________________________



(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 7:13:35 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
Bad fashion sense would be one of my justifications.

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: National Security - 11/1/2008 7:14:52 PM   
corysub


Posts: 1492
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

You show an tiny extract of a speech and you read all kinds of things into it? Get a grip is the best advise for paranoia. What exactly was you talking about this time, a possible police state if Obama wins?

Try to focus on the question mark at the end of the sentence. I have no freaking idea what he means. I just know he's talking stuff that could mean anything, and doesn't sound to me like anything good. If you know what he's talking about, say so.

K.
 


I found the rest of the speech.  "Words, just words"!  ....   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdF5TQIv1fU&feature=related

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> National Security Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.135