RE: whats the difference?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: whats the difference?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: whats the difference?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: whats the difference? - 3/15/2009 2:56:35 PM

crazyredhead1957

Posts: 189
Joined: 12/10/2008
Status: offline

Interesdom, thank You so much. That clarifies things alot. At this point in time i've only been in DBSM for five months, never quite understood what collared meant, and had no idea how to ask without feeling stupid. Many thanks to You, Sir.
edited to add: to me being owned is much deeper and much more rewarding than being married.

< Message edited by crazyredhead1957 -- 3/15/2009 3:03:40 PM >

(in reply to Interesdom)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: whats the difference? - 3/15/2009 3:10:59 PM

RealSub58

Posts: 1073
Status: offline

I don't agree with the snipped parts of IB's message.

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

The collar is an outwards sign that a slave is oiwned.....

The collar can also have an extreemly strong emotional and psychological effect on a slave too and in some cases may be considered similar to wedding ring.

I do believe that if I should possess any outward symbol from my Sir, it would have greater meaning to me as in regards to commitment.

I am owned and thus I know who I belong to. It is like the closing of a chapter or book and the writing or reading of another. An outward symbol is yet another book or chapter.

I do notice that the OP's profile indicates slave registration. This would be an outward symbol to me, as a submissive, that there is a commitment beyond just being owned.

(in reply to IronBear)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: whats the difference? - 3/15/2009 3:21:26 PM

kazzaslave

Posts: 291
Joined: 12/12/2008
Status: offline

quote:

For people trying to make it clear that they are not a want-to-be-slave but actually have an owner, they may choose to say they are a 'collared slave' or an 'owned slave'.

I'm curious, Interesdom, how you know for sure that those slaves who describe themselves as "collared slaves" are just using the term to indicate not being a "want to be" slave? I ask this because the slaves *I* know who say they are collared, *are* wearing a collar. I also find it hard to believe that you know they aren't actually "collared slaves".

kazza

_____________________________

I had no choice but to hear you ~Alanis Morrisette

All kazza's postings are approved by Master Malkinius

tsfka phoenix

Member of MoGa's In Crowd

Honorary member of the Fabulous Michigan Clique

(in reply to Interesdom)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: whats the difference? - 3/15/2009 5:09:11 PM

Interesdom

Posts: 197
Joined: 5/24/2004
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kazzaslave

quote:

For people trying to make it clear that they are not a want-to-be-slave but actually have an owner, they may choose to say they are a 'collared slave' or an 'owned slave'.

I'm curious, Interesdom, how you know for sure that those slaves who describe themselves as "collared slaves" are just using the term to indicate not being a "want to be" slave? I ask this because the slaves *I* know who say they are collared, *are* wearing a collar. I also find it hard to believe that you know they aren't actually "collared slaves".

kazza

I did not say that all people who describe themselves as collared slaves are using the term in any particular way. I have not said that those who say they are collared slaves are not collared slaves.

If my post is important to you, please read it carefully.

(in reply to kazzaslave)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: whats the difference? - 3/15/2009 10:01:46 PM

masterlink65

Posts: 683
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline

i prefer tattoos over branding. the risk of infection is pretty high with branding. i do not like to damage my property

(in reply to Interesdom)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: whats the difference? - 3/16/2009 2:56:20 AM

RealSub58

Posts: 1073
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: masterlink65

i removed my slaves collar in order to get through airport security so it could go visit its parents. when the slave arrived it called to tell me it had missed its collar.

i was very touched

I am very blessed Sir considers his property more than an object.

(in reply to masterlink65)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: whats the difference? - 3/16/2009 3:11:24 AM

kazzaslave

Posts: 291
Joined: 12/12/2008
Status: offline

Actually Interesdom, your post isn't important to me at all but you do imply, whether or not you meant to, that slaves use the term "collared slave" to differentiate themselves from unowned "want to be" slaves.

kazza

_____________________________

I had no choice but to hear you ~Alanis Morrisette

All kazza's postings are approved by Master Malkinius

tsfka phoenix

Member of MoGa's In Crowd

Honorary member of the Fabulous Michigan Clique

(in reply to Interesdom)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: whats the difference? - 3/16/2009 8:49:44 AM

masterlink65

Posts: 683
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RealSub58

quote:

ORIGINAL: masterlink65

i removed my slaves collar in order to get through airport security so it could go visit its parents. when the slave arrived it called to tell me it had missed its collar.

i was very touched

I am very blessed Sir considers his property more than an object.

you just contradicted yourself. property is not an object? what is it then?

an un owned slave is not a slave really is it? who is it enslaved to?

(in reply to RealSub58)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: whats the difference? - 3/16/2009 11:10:35 AM

SirPainBristol

Posts: 5
Joined: 3/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: masterlink65

i removed my slaves collar in order to get through airport security so it could go visit its parents. when the slave arrived it called to tell me it had missed its collar.

i was very touched

My slave wears a steel collar and it has never proved any problem at Airport Security.

I really don't understand why, but it simply never does. Shame really!

(in reply to masterlink65)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: whats the difference? - 3/16/2009 12:53:37 PM

masterlink65

Posts: 683
Joined: 11/3/2007
Status: offline

i think it is the brass in the lock that sets it off. my PA never sets off airport security but the buttons on my bib overalls will.

(in reply to SirPainBristol)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: whats the difference? - 3/16/2009 1:29:23 PM

SirPainBristol

Posts: 5
Joined: 3/16/2009
Status: offline

That makes a lot of sense actually. The collar I use has a small grub screw holding it in place to give the effect of being a complete circle, so no lock involved.

(in reply to masterlink65)

Profile

Post #: 31