RE: The human animal ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


RealityLicks -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 12:20:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadAxeman

RL, I may be a lobster but I know that Ali G is a white man, and being a comedy creation, hoping to be laughed at.


Well, then you're one very astute crustacean.  I'd always assumed he was a latter day Malcolm Muggeridge. 

Am I to take it that you and I have entered a mini-vendetta, only I hadn't noticed it starting?




came4U -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 12:23:50 PM)

Not only do many animals use tools, but how clever to make music for a mate.

NATURE | Parrots in the Land of Oz | Drumming up love | PBS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udYdg27oC-w




TheHeretic -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 12:38:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin
is our civility just a mask for the animal beneath ?



         Why can't we simply accept that we are both and that both are genuine?  I think we are semi-civilized animals, living somewhere along the chain of evolution, rather than at the glorious pinnacle of it. 




MadAxeman -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 12:38:47 PM)

I wouldn't call it that RL. You did make a careless remark that upset me about being a BNP enabler by simply not using hyperbole and bombast to describe them. But I see that as in the past and it is has become obvious you are a little prone to colourful statements. My opinion of you has been adjusted to accomodate this. We are not enemies.




Raechard -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 12:46:06 PM)

Someone once said:
 
What sets us apart from animals is the belief we have been set apart from animals.
 
WTF does that mean, some of my clichés make sense and some don't, that be life it sounded good at the time.

Edit: -s




MadAxeman -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 12:57:21 PM)

Wild horses wouldn't drag a cliche out of me.




jlf1961 -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 1:17:22 PM)

It is really surprising that we as a race claim superiority over the rest of the animal kingdom using various justifications, and none of them are 100% foolproof.

Let me explain:

1) the argument using tools and abstract thought was broken some years ago when it was discovered that the great apes are not only tool users, (including making tools for a particular task) but also capable of abstract thought, as demonstrated by Koko the Gorilla taught to sign.

Some of her paintings have clearly shown people, animals, etc, albeit crudely, but the themes are there.

2) The ability to communicate complicated ideas or thoughts.

The simple fact that dolphins and whales can communicate not only the location of a food source, but also develop a plan to maximize feeding by bringing the prey into tight balls, again proving abstract thought.  (look at footage of dolphins feeding on a shoal of anchovies.)

3) Our ability to alter our environment.

I am not sure that this qualifies as an argument saying that we are a higher order, since we destroy in order to build..... the very same way that viruses destroy cells in order to reproduce.

In point of fact, in most cases, our altering of our environment has had lasting impact on the environment, and in some cases made areas toxic to all forms of life.




MadAxeman -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 1:25:28 PM)

One gorilla doesn't make the species equal.
Herding prey is not complicated, many animals do it. Even bees let other bees know where a good source of nectar is.




Raechard -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 1:30:40 PM)

What sets us apart is.....comfort food. Does a Lion eat a zebra because it is unhappy? Ipso facto qed.




MadAxeman -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 1:31:57 PM)

It might if it came on a stick, deep fried.




Raechard -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 1:34:36 PM)

Good point, evidence I hadn't factored into the equation of humanity vs lionity.[8|]




jlf1961 -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 2:00:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadAxeman

One gorilla doesn't make the species equal.
Herding prey is not complicated, many animals do it. Even bees let other bees know where a good source of nectar is.


The statement was that "the capability of abstract thought makes us superior."

And you are correct, many animals herd prey.

However, if I may point out, most animals herd prey in a 2 dimensional environment, however, humans, dolphins and whales herd prey in a 3 dimensional environment, thus the task is not simple, and requires deductive reasoning.

Consider the following, modern hunter killer subs use computers to develop a firing solution on an enemy submarine.

While the sub can "see" with its passive sonar arrays, they have no clue as to if the target is shallower or deeper than they are, thus the computer is put to use.

Using active sonar changes the situation entirely, and the enemy now knows where the submarine is.

In modern air combat, AWACS aircraft and on board systems are used to plot intercepts.  In the early eras of jet fighters, interceptors were vectored into intercept positions, but the altitude was a guess, and the location was within +/- ten miles.

After that the pilot had to use his training, intuition and instinct to avoid being killed while trying to kill his target,  clear example of abstract thought, and in 3 dimensions.

Now dolphins use their acute hearing to get a bearing on a school of prey fish, plot intercepts in such a manner as to come up from below and keep the school in a tight ball and close to the surface.

They blow bubbles to contain the fish while they feed.  Other sea going mammals will usually come to the disturbance, and take advantage of the situation.

Now, if a human fighter pilot from any world war to the present is considered to be using abstract thought and training to locate and kill without himself being killed, while communicating with others, why is it so hard to grasp the concept of the dolphins doing the same thing.

One more point in the dolphins favor, dolphins do not complete destroy their habitat to make it acceptable for themselves, nor do they use up all the resources in one area.

The same is true for killer whales along the north west coast.

The common point is that the same pods of whales and dolphins have been living in the same area for a recorded 30 years.

Lastly, both dolphins and killer whales have been observed in pursuit of prey that has changed direction in which case, the killer whale or dolphin changes direction as well, but in a tighter arc to shorten the distance.

Few if any other animals do that, with the exception of humans.

FYI, this particular move is called "plotting an intercept curve," a fundamental  three dimensional combat tactic.

Finally, humans like some of the more primitive life forms on the planet such as locusts and some grazing animals will completely eliminate all the resources within its habitat, before moving on.

This again supports the argument that the human race is more akin to a parasite and a virus than anything else.




Musicmystery -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 2:06:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MadAxeman

Wild horses wouldn't drag a cliche out of me.


Well, just as long as you take the bull by the hand and don't mix metaphors.




celticlord2112 -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 2:09:54 PM)

quote:

Does a Lion eat a zebra because it is unhappy?

Has anyone asked a lion?




Musicmystery -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 2:45:02 PM)

Around feeding time? Are you nuts?




windchymes -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 4:59:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Does a Lion eat a zebra because it is unhappy?

Has anyone asked a lion?



Well, it's not like he can go to the Ben & Jerry's store and eat a whole container of Chunky Monkey when he's unhappy.




celticlord2112 -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 5:36:05 PM)

quote:

Well, it's not like he can go to the Ben & Jerry's store and eat a whole container of Chunky Monkey

No wonder he's unhappy.




tweedydaddy -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 5:40:44 PM)

Since we evolved from animals we can only really be an improved beast at the best of times. But humans noticeably divide into predators and prey.
The sting is working out which is which.




Lashra -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 6:18:58 PM)

quote:

No, we're not.

We're animals through and through, just a little less civilized than the rest of the animal kingdom.

I agree with this and have often said it. We are still evolving as a species and have a long way to before we reached "civilized".

~Lashra




bluepanda -> RE: The human animal ? (12/6/2008 6:29:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Does a Lion eat a zebra because it is unhappy?

Has anyone asked a lion?



Well, it's not like he can go to the Ben & Jerry's store and eat a whole container of Chunky Monkey when he's unhappy.


Who's going to stop him?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125