RE: britain wants guns back

RE: britain wants guns back (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Dnomyar -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 5:54:08 AM)
boi they will shanghi you and sell you into slavery.

thishereboi -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 5:56:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dnomyar boi they will shanghi you and sell you into slavery. Promise that I get sold to Miss Morrigan and I will start packing now.

Dnomyar -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 6:01:14 AM)
Nope your not leaving the area. Im bringing you 20 miles this way.

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 6:18:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aynne88 You can and have been able to purchase all liquor, beer, wine, spirits, etc. for almost a decade. The state discontinued overseeing what where called "agency" liquor stores and every single supermarket has a full liquor department. I have traveled throughout much of the states, it is that way everywhere I have been. I am not sure what states you are referring to. Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, and Florida, just off the top of my head.

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 6:22:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 In the US a lot of people have alarm systems. Often the thugs break in while we're off on vacation, because they know if they break in while us crazy fuckerz are home, it might be the last move they ever make. Or the last move you ever make, if they have more guns and/or are better at using them.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 7:00:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aneirin What makes me wonder is if we think about your gun culture as potential tourists, what is worse, us thinking everyone is packing a weapon, or you lot when you come over here with all our reports of knifings and feral youngsters, without your gun, how safe do you feel ? Most people dont carry concealed weapons and its only allowed in a few states.

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 7:37:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 Most people dont carry concealed weapons and its only allowed in a few states. Ah yes, another sweeping, inaccurate generalization with no basis in fact. Forty-eight states have some form of concealed-carry laws.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 7:41:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 Most people dont carry concealed weapons and its only allowed in a few states. Ah yes, another sweeping, inaccurate generalization with no basis in fact. Forty-eight states have some form of concealed-carry laws. "As of February 2008[update], 48 US states allow some form of concealed carry." Well yes there are those that get permits to carry for certain reasons. But i dont think I have to state this to people like they are morons, nor am I a nitpicker just looking to be hostile to someone. The point I was making anyway is that most people dont walk around with weapons. That is not a sweeping generalization.

Dnomyar -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 8:11:26 AM)
You can in Michigan. I think that this will spread to more states that don't have the ccw law.

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 8:11:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 The point I was making anyway is that most people dont walk around with weapons. That is not a sweeping generalization. Really? Then how do you define generalization? But I'm sure you have something to back up your argument. You know, silly little things like facts, statistics, studies, even surveys.

Dnomyar -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 8:17:04 AM)
Facts = Made up stastistics, fake surveys(who really tells the truth in them). The same with studies. They are always bias.

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 8:27:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dnomyar Facts = Made up stastistics, fake surveys(who really tells the truth in them). The same with studies. They are always bias. Maybe. It beats the shit out of me providing my opinion as fact though.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 8:55:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 The point I was making anyway is that most people dont walk around with weapons. That is not a sweeping generalization. Really? Then how do you define generalization? But I'm sure you have something to back up your argument. You know, silly little things like facts, statistics, studies, even surveys. Yes, GENERALLY people dont walk around with weapons! WHAt so wrong about saying this??? NO!!! I prefer you show me the statistics to refute this. How about you show me the statistics that most of the population walk around with concealed weapons since you are so hell bent on refuting everything? So first you argue that there arent many home invasions, then that people only have to worry if the have a disgruntled family member and now you are saying most Americans carry weapons? Thats what you are saying, since all I said was the majority of Americans do not walk around with weapons. Did you know that you are just coming across argumentative for no reason than looking for a fight? This is absolutley mind blowing to me. You say things that you dont back up with proof and then want other to prove their statements. This is a message board. i can make any statement I want and I am under no obligation to prove anything to you.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 8:58:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dnomyar You can in Michigan. I think that this will spread to more states that don't have the ccw law. AND in Florida and i believe Texas.

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 9:08:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 This is a message board. i can make any statement I want and I am under no obligation to prove anything to you. How nice. So we can say anything we want here without anyone challenging us to prove our opinion isn't total bullshit. When I post the kind of argumentative "facts" that you throw around loosely, I back my arguments. I don't post then challenge everyone else to prove me wrong. But I will take you up on it. Stay tuned.

Dnomyar -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 9:09:02 AM)
No home invasions, no car jackings, no muggings, no rapes, no nightclub shootings, no drug shootings. Seems like someone has not been to Detroit.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 9:11:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 This is a message board. i can make any statement I want and I am under no obligation to prove anything to you. How nice. So we can say anything we want here without anyone challenging us to prove our opinion isn't total bullshit. When I post the kind of argumentative "facts" that you throw around loosely, I back my arguments. I don't post then challenge everyone else to prove me wrong. But I will take you up on it. Stay tuned. Pretty funny. So if this is the case maybe you should be arguing for hand gun rights and not hand gun bans. Also lets be clear. You cant just come here and post how many people carry concealed weapons in states that have no laws against it. Give us unskewed statistics.

RCdc -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 9:14:05 AM)
Oh will you two get a room? The tension is way over the hot indicator...[:-][;)] the.dark. (.tryingtolightentheatmosphere.)

lusciouslips19 -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 9:16:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark Oh will you two get a room? The tension is way over the hot indicator...[:-][;)] the.dark. (.tryingtolightentheatmosphere.) hey, It aint me who put vinegar in his cereal. But he must want me![sm=shake.gif]

rulemylife -> RE: britain wants guns back (1/26/2009 9:19:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dnomyar No home invasions, no car jackings, no muggings, no rapes, no nightclub shootings, no drug shootings. Seems like someone has not been to Detroit. Yes I've lived a very sheltered life in a bucolic, peaceful place called Cleveland.

Page: << < prev 24 25 [26] 27 28 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875