loveandlight87 -> RE: a couple's third (2/19/2009 7:42:28 PM)
|
I guess it is pretty logical to hear the term 'third' in regards to a descriptor of one's part in a relationship and assume that it somehow means less. I think there are a fair number that would even agree that it is somehow a lesser status to be ‘a third’. For me, it’s about the context and the way the folks in the relationship view the term. It may just mean the third to enter the relationship. And although most probably don’t think of it this way (and just a weird random thought on my part) – is that, if asked, I would probably consider myself the first person in a mono-relationship because I was ‘here first’ and my partner would be ‘the second’ and the next ‘the third’ and so on. Now in this scenario if you were to ask ‘my second’ they would most likely consider themselves the first in the relationship and me ‘the second’ because *ta da* they were there first. Ok, a little out there I know. Suffice to say, some view the term merely as a sequencer, while others view it as a status. I happen to know that there are some that see all their partners, no matter what number, as equally important to them. In poly I think you would be hard pressed to love everyone equally. But, I think each person can be just as important and loved enough for them. Each partner can feel special and cared for. It may just be a different kind of love. Just like children need different kinds of love from their parents because each child is unique. Adults are no different. And as an aside – Imagine what it would feel like to feel loved like the person’s one and only – by two people!
|
|
|
|