Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 3:30:05 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
Usually, there's someone who comes along and starts chanting "the sky is falling! the sky is falling!", then heads back off into la-la land once they've performed that particular town crier service.

I wonder if they got hit by a piece.


(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 5:19:02 AM   
NormalOutside


Posts: 622
Joined: 1/8/2008
Status: offline
Gold and silver, my friends. Get it in your hands, not in paper or electronic form, and never in a deposit box.

_____________________________

I won't see your reply, because I don't use this account anymore.

(in reply to blacksword404)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 5:23:50 AM   
cjan


Posts: 3513
Joined: 2/21/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval


The FDIC chief said in the letter that the rapidly deteriorating economic conditions
raised the prospects of "a large number" of bank failures through 2010."



I've got worse news than that, Ven. He may be understating the problem, drastically understating it. There are a growing number of economists who maintain that the banking system is not just in deep trouble, but that it's already insolvent - that the banks are essentially bankrupt. That they simply do not have the money to meet the legal definition of solvency, which in simplest terms requires that banks have on hand shareholder capital equivalent to 10% of the obligations on their books. With the number of foreclosures still rising, and rising at faster and faster rates, there is almost zero chance that the banks will be able to meet that requirement this year. We're talking trillions of dollars here. Thus, massive and widespread bank failures are probably inevitable.

The only solution is to at least partly nationalize the banking system, even if only for a limited time period. Mind you, I'm not saying I advocate that; I'm just saying that's probably going to be the only realistic option. There's no other way to fix this, because the federal government is the only entity in the world that has the kind of money needed to keep the banks solvent. Faced with a choice between nationalizing the banks and letting the banking system fail, they won't have any choice but to nationalize the banks.

The math is simple. The Obama administration knows this, but they're not telling us that. Yet. I believe they're waiting until the walls start to fall, at which time people will be so terrified they'll jump at any solution. Right now, people aren't scared enough yet, so nationalizing the banks would serve only to hasten the economic decline, and Obama would be blamed for causing the collapse. If they wait until it's inevitable, they can just step out front and say, "hey, we tried everything, but now we have no choice." And people will be more inclined to give them a pass. I think we're looking at a very ugly, and a very scary, year or two here.This latest message from Sheila Bair is just one more subtle step in the process of preparing us for the nationalization of the banking system.



I agree with your analysis, Panda.There is no alternative to temporary nationalization of the banks and fundamental reform of the financial system. However, there is currently too much resistance to doing so . This resistance will wither as the situation worsens .


< Message edited by cjan -- 3/6/2009 5:29:18 AM >


_____________________________

"I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A bird will fall ,frozen , dead, from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself."- D.H. L

" When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks in to you"- Frank Nitti



(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 5:40:33 AM   
camille65


Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007
From: Austin Texas
Status: offline
I dodged the 401 hell by not having one. Slid around the housing crash by somehow selling my house on the very first showing. I don't see a way to make sure my money/future/life is kept safe now, I did spread it amongst MMAs, a couple of bonds, 2 CDs and the rest is in *dum dum da dum* FDIC insured banks. No more than 100K in any one bank.

I don't believe gold and silver is the answer (no solid reasoning, I just don't believe it).

Sometimes I get so tired of reading about this, watching my friends and family lose what they worked their entire lives for. I know I am fortunate far beyond most but I'm still scared because I don't have enough expertise in this area nor do I hold any more trust in those that say they do.

I'm tired of worrying.


_____________________________


~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).




(in reply to cjan)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 6:01:33 AM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
What really is the issue i see is all of the baby boomers who are all heading into retirement or already are.  They are a big percentage of this economy and if they don't retire because their savings are in jeopardy, its going to continue to hurt the job front because they won't open up jobs with their leaving for retirement, and they won't be putting retirement money into the economy because they are terrified they won't have any in the near future.

angel

_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to Ganarea)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 6:24:02 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
I knew there was someone to blame for this whole thing! Fucking babyboomers, bunch of greedy selfish bastards. It's all their fault.

~ MissGenX

PS: in all seriousness: my spouse and I actually have Credit Union accounts. Anybody know whether it's true that CUs are safer, or am I delusional  ?

_____________________________



(in reply to barelynangel)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 6:50:13 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Unfortunately cammille, that 100K limit is per depositor mot per bank nor per account. It may hedge you nicely if one of your banks fail, but in these times multiple failures are a real possibility.

In general though, this is just the other shoe dropping, and this whole thing is proving to have alot of shoes.

Actually I think property is one of the best investments right now if one can manage to hold on to it. After all, what good is a safe place to put your money if it is worthless ?

The only other thing I think might be gold, but first one must know why. Gold, as high as it is right now, I believe is undervalued. There is only one sure way to accomplish that, to make sure there is a slight glut on the market. Once gold rises to a certain level I think it will quickly skyrocket once certain conditions are met. Then someone is going to make alot of money. This is kind of the opposite of what the Hunt brothers tried to pull off.

During the last depression, sure some people jumped out of windows, but others made money.

T

(in reply to camille65)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 6:51:10 AM   
UncleNasty


Posts: 1108
Joined: 3/20/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

Usually, there's someone who comes along and starts chanting "the sky is falling! the sky is falling!", then heads back off into la-la land once they've performed that particular town crier service.

I wonder if they got hit by a piece.




The funniest thing is when, on their way back to la-la land they trip over one that their head buried in the sand.


Uncle Nasty

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 6:54:12 AM   
cjan


Posts: 3513
Joined: 2/21/2008
Status: offline
kittin, so far, FDIC insured accounts up to 250k are still safe. The article that the OP linked to says that the FDIC intends to raise rates charged to banks in order to shore up FDIC funds in the anticipation that more banks will fail . It's a prudent move by the FDIC.

The last thing we need right now is a panic induced run on the banks to withdraw savings in the fear that the FDIC is underfunded. Yes, more banks will fail, I believe that GM, Citigroup and others will go belly up and that there will be a great deal of blood-letting until the scenario that Panda outlined comes to pass. But the gov'ment won't allow the FDIC to fail and it will temporarily nationalize tha banks when the time is politically right.


_____________________________

"I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A bird will fall ,frozen , dead, from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself."- D.H. L

" When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks in to you"- Frank Nitti



(in reply to Ganarea)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 6:56:44 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cjan

But the gov'ment won't allow the FDIC to fail and it will temporarily nationalize the banks when the time is politically right.



I love how effortlesly you find the words that turn me on *sigh*  .

_____________________________



(in reply to cjan)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 7:31:20 AM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Unfortunately cammille, that 100K limit is per depositor mot per bank nor per account. It may hedge you nicely if one of your banks fail, but in these times multiple failures are a real possibility.

In general though, this is just the other shoe dropping, and this whole thing is proving to have alot of shoes.

Actually I think property is one of the best investments right now if one can manage to hold on to it. After all, what good is a safe place to put your money if it is worthless ?

The only other thing I think might be gold, but first one must know why. Gold, as high as it is right now, I believe is undervalued. There is only one sure way to accomplish that, to make sure there is a slight glut on the market. Once gold rises to a certain level I think it will quickly skyrocket once certain conditions are met. Then someone is going to make alot of money. This is kind of the opposite of what the Hunt brothers tried to pull off.

During the last depression, sure some people jumped out of windows, but others made money.

T
Term, I like you, but you really ought to do some basic research before you go pontificating about what is and what isn't.
First, it's now 250K until Dec. 31, 2009. Second, it's 250K per person per institution, not all deposits everywhere. Third, even that 250K can be exceeded.
https://www2.fdic.gov/EDIE/fdic_info.html

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 9:41:08 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
Armageddon outta here.

_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 10:55:54 AM   
Honsoku


Posts: 422
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blacksword404
Ok maybe I don't understand how it works but if the FDIC is there to cover peoples money in banks. When most banks fail it is my understanding that the money in the accounts are still there and the government or another bank takes over. Either way business continues. So why is the FDIC going broke? Where are they spending money?


There isn't enough money to cover everyone's deposit, just enough to cover a certain amount of bank failures. At any given time, a bank only keeps a small percentage of it's total deposits on hand. The rest is loaned out. Yes, the money hasn't vanished when a bank fails, but most of it isn't physically present for withdrawal either. I haven't run the math, but I'm fairly certain that if everyone tried to withdraw every dollar from the banking system so they could bury it in their backyard, that there wouldn't enough physical dollar bills in the world to meet everyone's demand.

The whole banking sector, and most of the economy, runs on confidence. Yes, there have been paper losses, but really all this trouble is because people and institutions have lost confidence in the system and each other. Everyone is so terrified of being the person stuck holding the bag that the end result is going to be that everyone will be stuck holding the bag.

(in reply to blacksword404)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 11:04:09 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Well thank GAWD the IRS has taken/is taking all of my money!!!

I haven't anything to worry about!

I knew there had to be a silver lining to this IRS hell I've been dealing with............


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund cou... - 3/6/2009 1:21:03 PM   
aravain


Posts: 1211
Joined: 8/26/2008
Status: offline
~FR~

I guess it's good my bank account is practically empty D:

Just enough to not have to pay 'low account status' fees or whatever.

If US Bank goes belly up... D:

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 35
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078