RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ?

RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

AngelofAgony -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/22/2009 4:54:21 PM)
sfdrew ... I couldn't have said it any better! A cuckold should be allowed to have sex with his Mistress only if She wishes it. Personally, I love having sex with My cuck. I absolutely love coming home, crawling in bed with My cuck while I share all the details of My date with him. Most of the time My cuck and I have amazing, mind-blowing sex while I tell him how much better My boyfriend is. Granted, this may not be for everyone. My point is, that the Mistress needs to figure out what works for Her and do it. That may or may not include having sex with Her cuck. There's no right or wrong way to do things.

slavekal -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/22/2009 5:09:03 PM)
That is how Ms. Mlicious does it. Makes me crazy. At this very moment, she is not exactly having sex, but she is on vacation in Florida being licked by her Florida boy while he lies beneath her in the smother box.

LadyLupineNYC -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/22/2009 5:39:36 PM)
I guess you have no idea how annoying these types of posts are to people who are actually trying for follow the discussion. They add nothing, smack of self-aggrandizing back patting, and discourage people who are actually looking for advice. It is one thing provide meaningful background about one's relationship (assuming you actually have one and aren't making it up, Lord knows that happens all the time around here) and quite another to be testing your crappy wank material writing skills. While I don't suspect that you care one iota what I have to say, I can assure you that many more of here find this time of posting droll. Thank god for the 'hide' button. As for my take on all- as someone who engages in a variety of forms of cuckolding, the key is in part to remember that you are adding a very complex set of relationships on top of the already complex nature of human relationships. It is truly not for everyone, porn and fantasy often have very little to do with reality, but can also be am amazing exploration of the depth of the relationship between the Mistress and her cuck regardless if they have a standalone sexual relationship.

slavekal -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/22/2009 6:34:48 PM)
If you are referring to me, I don't lie. All my posts are real. Nobody guaranteed that you would like everyone's posts. No one is obligated to get your approval. And don't underestimate yourself. We all do care one iota what you think.

hardbodysub -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/22/2009 9:04:31 PM)
LadyLupineNYC sure as heck doesn't speak for all of us, and arguably not most of us. "Many more of here" (is that something like "All your base are belong to us"?) find slavekal's postings, including the one here, usually interesting, and very much related to the OP's topic.

VampiresLair -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/22/2009 9:17:02 PM)
I had a cuckold who was not allowed sex with me because I didnt wish it. I have had others that were allowed, because I did. There is no SHOULD in my relationships. If the cuckold in question is unhappy with the sexual content of his present relationship, then he is free to leave and seek out another more amenable relationship elsewhere. Just as he isnt required to stay, she isnt required to perform. DV

LadyLupineNYC -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/23/2009 4:10:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hardbodysub LadyLupineNYC sure as heck doesn't speak for all of us, and arguably not most of us. "Many more of here" (is that something like "All your base are belong to us"?) find slavekal's postings, including the one here, usually interesting, and very much related to the OP's topic. It is referring to those of us who find overtly sexual 'me too!!' posts (as in sexual for no reason other than to be sexual vs actually informative like many of the other posts in this thread). It's like the poster who is always jumping in on the anal sex posts (you know who I am talking about [:)] the one who is always writing like this [:)] about his 'Mistress' [:)]); anyone find that guy enlightening?. Obviously not EVERYone will agree with me (classy pointing out a typing mistake. Want some big boy pants to go with that?) but pointing out that that everyone will see it might way when I already alude to it is silly. I am sure that he can fight his own 'battels'; he resonded, I am over it. Why bother to jump in?

slavekal -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/23/2009 4:31:59 AM)
Not trying to make or continue an argument, but I did not think my post was off topic. I kind of cosigned what another person posted, and I was telling the truth when I did it, then I mentioned something that was happening to me that very moment. I thought that what I said was at least somewhat related to the original post. Anyway...Ms. M will be coming home tonight. If she bangs another guy and/or me this week, I will let y'all know.

sambamanslilgirl -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/23/2009 4:44:47 AM)
depends on my mood my pet was very lucky to have sex with me over the weekend

chamberqueen -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/23/2009 4:57:48 AM)
There are times that cuckolding session is set up specifically for a male sub to watch his Domme have sex with another. It is up to her to direct what will happen next. She may choose not to let him be involved at all except as a voyeur, may have him orally clean her and/or the man afterward (either orally or otherwise), or may invite him to have sex with her when it is over. There are an incredible number of variations. It is ultimately up to the Domme to make the decision on how to do it. There is no "right" or "wrong" way to do it.

hairslave -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/24/2009 7:18:30 PM)
Yes you are right in that just because She may be free , it doesn't mean that She can easaly find someone that can live up to Her standards. If She is smart, She wont look to drunks to satisfie Her sexaul erges or pleasers either. But in this life style She allow should have the power to decide who can optain the stus of winning Her favors.

hairslave -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/24/2009 7:35:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Andalusite I don't believe a Domme (or any woman, unless she has specifically negotiated otherwise), should feel she has to have sex with someone if she doesn't want to. * No woman *, no matter if she has formally agreed to having sex with any one or not should,. in anyway be held to having sex with anyone that She at some point decides,.. that She no longer wants to have sex at that time and ( or ) with that man.

VanessaChaland -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 12:19:02 AM)
Those the find posts "overtly" sexual are free not to read them, I believe. Cuckolding is sexual. Minus the political arguments, health discussion, and jokes, nearly everything on this whole site is sexual. The guy is expressing his opinions, should they be "sexual" so be it. I have not problem with it, and if I did, I would just ignore his posts. quote: ORIGINAL: LadyLupineNYC It is referring to those of us who find overtly sexual 'me too!!' posts (as in sexual for no reason other than to be sexual vs actually informative like many of the other posts in this thread). It's like the poster who is always jumping in on the anal sex posts (you know who I am talking about [:)] the one who is always writing like this [:)] about his 'Mistress' [:)]); anyone find that guy enlightening?. Obviously not EVERYone will agree with me (classy pointing out a typing mistake. Want some big boy pants to go with that?) but pointing out that that everyone will see it might way when I already alude to it is silly. I am sure that he can fight his own 'battels'; he resonded, I am over it. Why bother to jump in?

LadyLupineNYC -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 4:02:35 AM)
There is a difference about discussing the finer points of cuckolding, sex, etc without talking about how so and so licks someone's pussy etc. You are right, when I see someone who writes like that and it is a repetitive thing, I 'hide' the posts. The point I was making is that they were sexual but for no reason (as in, they didn't actually add to the discussion). They just come off as bragging. If others don't agree, that is fine, but, equally there are those who don't disagree (obviously). I am hardly some big prude and the fact that I even said something about it considering the things I ignore should suggest that I had a reasons to bring it up despite the fact that I knew what the potential for backlash. There is more than enough BS passing through on the emails, there is no reason to keep cheeping the discussion on this side.

MadameMarque -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 8:23:46 AM)
Your post wasn't off topic. And God forbid someone on a forum about BDSM should make reference to their personal, real life experiences, or should talk with joy about something "wank" worthy. I guess we all forgot that we're only on here to write a thesis for the Journal of Psychology, and not to have fun.

LadyLupineNYC -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 3:17:14 PM)
I think about it like any conversation. If I am in a conversation that opens up with "I can't wait to fuck the titties off that cunt'...well, I know what I am in for. (Obviously I am exaggerating). If you were sitting to a dinner with a group of friends where the tone was more 'polite', would it not be jarring to hear something like that? Especially if that was the only way that person chose to interact with the others in the group? Bravo if you want to hear about some Mistress 'banging' some guy and how much he would love to lick her pussy etc etc...but this started as a topic about if Mistress should or should not have sex with her s-type and DIDN'T start off as "Should Mistresses fuck the living daylights out of her pussy whipped tiny dicked two-hole fuck toy slave?" Again, I exaggerate. I get that there is a time and place for the graphic 'me too' posts and as someone who used to be in law enforcement living with a combat vet I assure your our household is filled with raunchy language. Amazingly, we are able to refrain from that type of talk at work and in front of our parents. I just feel that this post one was trying to aim for an actually discussion, I guess I was wrong since it seems all we are now talking about is how my opintion is somehow wrong vs. trying to be constructice to the dicsussion topic.

beeble -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 4:03:11 PM)
quote: LadyLupineNYC wrote: If you were sitting to a dinner with a group of friends where the tone was more 'polite', would it not be jarring to hear something like that? But we're not sitting to a dinner with a group of friends where the tone is more `polite'. We're discussing sex. We're discussing sex, in a thread about sex. Furthermore, we're discussing sex, in a thread about sex that even has the word `sex' in the title. Not only that, but we're discussing sex, in a thread about sex, the title of which mentions `sex' on a website about something that involves a lot of sex. So I'm just a little bemused by the sudden prudishness. quote: Especially if that was the only way that person chose to interact with the others in the group? What if the major way a person chooses to interact with others in the group is complaining that somebody's discussing sex, in a thread about sex, the title of which mentions `sex' on a website about something that involves a lot of sex? Since nobody else seems to object to SlaveKal's posts (and please don't tell us that the lurkers support you in E-mail), I suggest you just block him and move on. beeble. [edited for typos.]

Vendaval -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 4:04:09 PM)
How many cuckolds can a cuckholdress cuck? [8D]

LadyLupineNYC -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 5:11:10 PM)
Oh I see....some aspects about BDSM are sexual therefore ALL conversation MUST be sexual (and forget about artful or even enlightening). Yes yes, you are right...silly me. I get it now: why say "I am wondering about 'shoulds and shouldn'ts' of sex with in a particular contecxt when really what everyone wants to read about is 'to fuck or not to fuck'. Is language really that dead?

beeble -> RE: c: Do you believe that a cuckold should be allowed sex with his cuckoldress ? (3/25/2009 5:28:19 PM)
quote: LadyLupineNYC wrote: Oh I see....some aspects about BDSM are sexual therefore ALL conversation MUST be sexual I never said that all conversations must be sexual. Just that, you know, `should a cuckold be allowed sex with his cuckoldress' is an inherently sexual topic. It's written right there in the subject line: `sex'. beeble.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

8.007813E-02