Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gaza - the facts emerge


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Gaza - the facts emerge Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/28/2009 6:09:53 PM   
FullCircle


Posts: 5713
Joined: 11/24/2005
Status: offline
Those people always hated violence the point you are not hearing me say is that IRA/Real IRA/Continuity IRA/UVF/UDA/UFF any other violent abbreviation has the same political credibility in my opinion...0. It's easy to claim credit for ending violence when you are the main cause of it, just like the age old protection racket.

< Message edited by FullCircle -- 3/28/2009 6:10:27 PM >


_____________________________

ﮒuקּƹɼ ƾɛϰưϫԼ Ƨωιϯϲћ.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/28/2009 6:12:03 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Im hearing you loud and clear, we just dont agree, which is okay.

(in reply to FullCircle)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/28/2009 6:21:34 PM   
FullCircle


Posts: 5713
Joined: 11/24/2005
Status: offline
Once you add violence to the equation of what you are selling people you've failed in your politics because it isn't about convincing people it's about coercing people. The threat of violence that they dangle in front of us is only half as bad as the actual violence. People don't appreciate this fact though. Ghandi a true hero that changed the world in ways they'll never replicate and to put these people in comparison with him for aiding world peace is an insult. As a true politician knows the first aim of politics is dispute resolution without violence or the threat of violence. Anyone that has ever conducted violent acts has tainted themselves and will also be using an aspect of fear in their negotiations whether they themselves like it or not and that isn't politics IMHO.
 
The hope of peace is the equal opposite to the threat of violence, they use that term quite a lot don’t they? Why should peace be a hope it should be the natural state. See what I mean?

< Message edited by FullCircle -- 3/28/2009 6:26:02 PM >


_____________________________

ﮒuקּƹɼ ƾɛϰưϫԼ Ƨωιϯϲћ.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/28/2009 8:24:57 PM   
CruelNUnsual


Posts: 624
Joined: 9/28/2008
Status: offline
They have no "hereditary rights". There was no such thing as a "Palestinian" before Israel was lawfully granted their land, some of the best parts of which were then taken away from them.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 4:05:30 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

They have no "hereditary rights". There was no such thing as a "Palestinian" before Israel was lawfully granted their land, some of the best parts of which were then taken away from them.


More ignorant nonsense. The term Palestine was used in Roman times. Even speaking of the modern era the term "Palestinian" was used to refer to anyone living in Palestine after WW1.

(in reply to CruelNUnsual)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 6:05:38 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
The palestinians allow a terrorist organization to hide amongst them and there is a price to be paid for that. I feel bad for the innocents who died but I can't see any way around it if the palestinian people continue to support genocidal terrorists.


One has to wonder what the view might have been, had the British sealed off half of Belfast, allowing in only a tiny proportion of the food and water required by the population there, denying the residents health resources and cutting off the power for a few years, before bombarding it for several days with battlefield munitions designed for open war theatres and delivered by artillery and from the air, prior to driving tanks in and flattening homes and businesses in an attempt to kill or capture the few hundred IRA and Sinn Fein members that lived there?

One tends to think that had the British done all that and not killed any civilians, the outcry worldwide - and perhaps especially from north America - would have been deafening, with barely a mention of the terrorist nature of the targets of the operation. The British would have become pariahs overnight, regarded without question as war criminals and pursued by international law enforcement to the ends of the Earth. How much more so had they managed to kill as much as one civilian inadvertently, let alone several hundred including women and children - and how much more so still were there the slightest evidence that such deaths had been anything but accidental. Arguments about terrorists hiding amongst the population would simply not have been accepted.

Still, there is so clearly nothing in common between the above situation and that of Gaza that its hardly worth discussing.

E


Two things, fisrt no one is starving in Gaza despite propoganda you've apparently heard. Starvation is visually diagnosable, distinctive swollen belly is the most telling, and you won't ever see that from Gaza.

Secondly you might want to go over my posting history before trying to tie the IRA to me. I have always opposed terrorists whether they be my Irish cousins or Arabs. If Derry housed a terror group whose stated goal was the eradication of the Protestants who routinely randomly killed civilians throughout England then I would be completely comfortable with rooting out those terrorists by what ever means were necessary.


Indeed, no starvation (though such wasnt mentioned). Luckily those damned Palestinians are a resourceful bunch what with digging tunnels through which to access food and so on; though one would wonder how isolated Republicans might have managed something similar in my scenario, given the very different geology and all those underground service utilities. But of course, we know that Palestinians dont bring food and medical supplies through those tunnels - only terrible weapons of mass destruction with which to destroy their neighbours - after all, Israel wouldnt and hasnt imposed a blockade on Gaza at all so there is no need to smuggle food.

As for your group of Republicans in Derry - are you truly saying that you would give your blessing to imposing upon the city the same circumstances as found in Gaza (blockade, cutting off utilities et al) for a few years, before launching a coordinated attack on the city, to include the destruction of homes, businesses, hospitals and schools and the inevitable slaughter of innocent civilians that occurs in such a scenario, in order to kill or capture perhaps a few dozen, maybe at the outside a couple of hundred terrorists?

And further, given this, why doesnt the US simply employ the same strategy to deal with "problem neighbourhoods" in its cities? After all, it is predominantly from these neighbourhoods that so much death and destruction of other neighbourhoods arises by way of violence, robberies, drugs and so on. The only difference is that these "problem neighbourhoods" are regarded as a criminal problem rather than a political problem (though the application of such distinctions is in itself a political issue), and they continue to threaten the US as a whole despite all other measures. ah - but wait; the Palestinian matter is one of criminality too of course, since they are not regarded as having a valid political aim, which is why we call them terrorists rather than freedom fighters.

So the path is then clear - seal off "problem neighbourhoods" in Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, New York. Keep the residents in and keep control of what food, medical supplies, water and power go in. Crime problems stopped overnight, surely? And it that doesnt work, and the inhabitant continue to misbehave, send in the National Guard to teach them a lesson.

But somehow I cant see the US going for such a strategy; I wonder why its good enough for Gaza but beyond consideration in the States?

E



_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 8:55:40 AM   
CruelNUnsual


Posts: 624
Joined: 9/28/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

They have no "hereditary rights". There was no such thing as a "Palestinian" before Israel was lawfully granted their land, some of the best parts of which were then taken away from them.


More ignorant nonsense. The term Palestine was used in Roman times. Even speaking of the modern era the term "Palestinian" was used to refer to anyone living in Palestine after WW1.



the only ignorant nonsense is yours. "Palestine" was a Roman term they tried to replace "Israel" with after their genocide of the Jews. There were no indigenous "Palestinians" other than the Jews that were there. "Palestine" was never an autonomous terrritory, ruled sequentially by various nations, ultimately the British. They ceded part of the territory BACK to its original owners, the Israelites. Even the Arabs insisted there was no "Palestinians", it was just a territory in southern Syria. As Zuhair Muhsin, PLO executive council said:

"yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel."

If you want to apply the name to its historical settlers (and the grant of the land by god, if you happen to believe that nonsense) Palestinian = Israeli.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 10:39:25 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Your changing your tune. You stated there was no such person as a Palestinian before the creation of modern Israel, which is incorrect. As for history, how far do we go back ? Even in the time of King Saul there were Philstine City States.

Why deny the historical claims of just one set of people ?  As far as I see it both sides hold valid claims.

(in reply to CruelNUnsual)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 11:12:55 AM   
CruelNUnsual


Posts: 624
Joined: 9/28/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Your changing your tune. You stated there was no such person as a Palestinian before the creation of modern Israel, which is incorrect. As for history, how far do we go back ? Even in the time of King Saul there were Philstine City States.

Why deny the historical claims of just one set of people ?  As far as I see it both sides hold valid claims.


Youre right, I should have said that there was no such person as an Arab Palestinian before the creation of modern Israel. However, if you ask anyone who the Palestinians are they respond in the context of Arab Palestinians.

If you want to talk about "historical claims" and deny treaties and the results of war, feel free...but then you are stuck going to the ORIGINAL inhabitants, the Israelis. That is the only valid historical claim that ignores the reality of the way land has always been apportioned.

< Message edited by CruelNUnsual -- 3/29/2009 11:14:59 AM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 1:05:26 PM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
You talk as though Israelis and Israelites are analogous.  What about all the Russians with one Jewish grandparent and openly anti-semitic attitudes?  And what has all this to do with the hundreds of civilian deaths in Gaza two months (not two millenia) ago?

(in reply to CruelNUnsual)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 1:09:14 PM   
CruelNUnsual


Posts: 624
Joined: 9/28/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks

What about all the Russians with one Jewish grandparent and openly anti-semitic attitudes?  And what has all this to do with the hundreds of civilian deaths in Gaza two months (not two millenia) ago?


You tell me. You're the one who made the erroneous claim that Palestinian Arabs have "hereditary rights".

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 1:47:24 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Your changing your tune. You stated there was no such person as a Palestinian before the creation of modern Israel, which is incorrect. As for history, how far do we go back ? Even in the time of King Saul there were Philstine City States.

Why deny the historical claims of just one set of people ?  As far as I see it both sides hold valid claims.


This is the crux of the problem...neither side wants to admit the other has an equal claim to the area in history.

It is strange how three great religions based on the same God all developed in the same area… all with the same God of mercy and forgiveness. Yet over the years they have all fought, murdered, and pillaged in the name of that merciful God… Actions contrary to the teaching of all three religions. Yet they still think there will be a place for them in heaven… Myself I think there will be plenty of people to stoke the fires of hell.

Butch

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 1:50:47 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Cruel are you denying an indigenous people were removed from the land now known as Israel.If not don't you concede these people have some legitimate claims.
When I say indigenous I am referring to pre 1948 inhabitants...

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to CruelNUnsual)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 2:37:09 PM   
CruelNUnsual


Posts: 624
Joined: 9/28/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Cruel are you denying an indigenous people were removed from the land now known as Israel.If not don't you concede these people have some legitimate claims.
When I say indigenous I am referring to pre 1948 inhabitants...


First Century AD is a bit before 1948. The area known as Canaan was first settled by the Children of Israel and ultimately they formed the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah. They were murdered/sold into slavery and many others were driven out by the Roman Empire under Hadrian, who renamed the area Palestine (and renamed Jerusalem)  in an attempt to dissociate it from the Jews/Israel. Jews never completely left the land, though, and until the 20th century there was no other sovereign nation-state in the territory. Arab-Muslims conquered the Byzantines, and, having no name for the territory, adapted the Roman name as "Falastin". After the Muslims were conquered by the Crusaders the land was never returned to Arab rule, though many of the inhabitants were Muslim by immigration or conversion. The only indigenous people removed from the land were Israelis.

As good a summary as any, by an Arab:

http://www.cdn-friends-icej.ca/isreport/septoct00/myths.html

Edit: I should clarify that I dont buy the "heredity" or "indigenous peoples" argument to start with. Thats not how territories/nations are formed in this world, its by grant/purchase or conquest. Your "rights" to a land are only as good as your ability and willingness to defend it. But by either standard the "rights" to  Palestine rest with the Israeli's.

< Message edited by CruelNUnsual -- 3/29/2009 2:49:15 PM >

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 3:45:39 PM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

This is the crux of the problem...neither side wants to admit the other has an equal claim to the area in history.


Butch
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Again: that may be part of a much wider problem but this thread was sparked as a reaction to the military action in January, an immediate and current matter.  There are some amazing scholars on this site but if I wanted to read treatises on history I would go to a library and read people who do it for a living.  It's a shame the apologists can't stay on topic but I'm going away for a few days - maybe I'll return to a surprise.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 6:42:34 PM   
UPSG


Posts: 331
Joined: 1/22/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

They have no "hereditary rights". There was no such thing as a "Palestinian" before Israel was lawfully granted their land, some of the best parts of which were then taken away from them.


More ignorant nonsense. The term Palestine was used in Roman times. Even speaking of the modern era the term "Palestinian" was used to refer to anyone living in Palestine after WW1.



the only ignorant nonsense is yours. "Palestine" was a Roman term they tried to replace "Israel" with after their genocide of the Jews. There were no indigenous "Palestinians" other than the Jews that were there. "Palestine" was never an autonomous terrritory, ruled sequentially by various nations, ultimately the British. They ceded part of the territory BACK to its original owners, the Israelites. Even the Arabs insisted there was no "Palestinians", it was just a territory in southern Syria. As Zuhair Muhsin, PLO executive council said:

"yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel."

If you want to apply the name to its historical settlers (and the grant of the land by god, if you happen to believe that nonsense) Palestinian = Israeli.


Israelite or Jew?

I thought "Jew" came to reference the descendants of the Hebrews from the kingdom of Judea, not the kingdom of Israel. And the Israelites to my understanding, assimilated non-Hebrews into their nation of Israelites.

The Ashekanazi - the term Ashekanazi like that of Sephardic - does infer Middle Eastern Israelite. And how do Ethiopian Jews have more right to the region of Palestine than the Arab Palestinians? Wouldn't it seem odd if someone suggested Husa = Sicilian?

(in reply to CruelNUnsual)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 7:14:36 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UPSG

The Ashekanazi - the term Ashekanazi like that of Sephardic - does infer Middle Eastern Israelite.



You are wrong. Again.

_____________________________



(in reply to UPSG)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 7:17:01 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Oh dear lord, is he trying to lecture you, of all people, on Hebrew/Jewish terminology, kitten! 

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 7:22:28 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Succinct tonight Kittin?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: Gaza - the facts emerge - 3/29/2009 7:23:55 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
UPSG should stop the lecturing altogether and go back to reading, before making any more of these ridiculous and erroneous statements. On the other hand, it provides some lightweight entertainment. Here and there.

_____________________________



(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Gaza - the facts emerge Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.145