RE: This is what happens... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> RE: This is what happens... (5/10/2009 9:47:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

*fast reply*
After reading this thread I know who's house to rob and who's house not to rob.


You can rob my house, anytime...[;)]




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: This is what happens... (5/10/2009 9:47:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


Think about it… if you had a gun and there were 5 people within 8 feet of you could you shoot all 5 before they got you? They had no intention of shooting … they were just scaring.


I wasn't aware that you were not  only present at  the event, but reading the minds of everyone involved. I assume you must have been, because otherwise how could you speak with such certainty?




FirmhandKY -> RE: This is what happens... (5/10/2009 10:27:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


Think about it… if you had a gun and there were 5 people within 8 feet of you could you shoot all 5 before they got you? They had no intention of shooting … they were just scaring.


I wasn't aware that you were not  only present at  the event, but reading the minds of everyone involved. I assume you must have been, because otherwise how could you speak with such certainty?


It has always amazed me how Monday morning quarterbacks are so darn smart, and that their adrenaline would never have pumped, and how everything would have been crystal clear if they had been in such a life or death situation.

So many Clint Eastwoods out there .... [:)]

Firm




WyldHrt -> RE: This is what happens... (5/10/2009 11:12:23 PM)

quote:

You are assuming they would kill everyone... they did not say that

No, actually I'm not. As I said, there is no way to know whether they would have killed anyone or not. That said, my reaction to being faced by someone masked and pointing a gun at me wouldn't be "Ah, he won't kill me", it would be "How do I stay alive".
quote:

in fact if I was one of 5 boys and a small room and one guy with a gun shot someone I would rush him...I’m not just going to stand there and let him shoot me… If they planned on killing they would have made them get on the floor and tied everyone up first... common sense.

Speculating, always fun! I'll play: On the other hand, if you (the crook) weren't planning on shooting anyone, how would you plan to get away if your victims weren't tied up and gagged? They would be screaming bloody murder the second you were out the door, wouldn't they? Maybe chasing you? That said, if you got them down or against the wall, how long would it take to empty the clip into them on your way out the door? Again, we will never know, as the situation didn't get that far.
quote:

Think about it… if you had a gun and there were 5 people within 8 feet of you could you shoot all 5 before they got you? They had no intention of shooting … they were just scaring.

Woah. Were you there? How in the hell would you know the dimensions of the room, distances, or relative positions of the people involved? To say that they had no intention of shooting is beyond speculation. To go with the most basic premise of the story, you still have 2 guys who thought it was a great idea to try a home invasion on 10 people in a frikkin apartment. That really doesn't say a lot for the amount of common sense the bad guys possessed. If you had been there, would you really have been telling the others that the guys with the guns were just scaring? Really?
quote:

And yes it is the crooks fault first… but the hero’s fault the girl got shot as well. If as he said when he came in the room the guy was getting ready to rape a girl… which I don’t believe after the shootout a few feet away…. Then why didn’t he say freeze… then if the guy tried to turn and shoot him then bang.

Nothing said about a shootout in the living room, nor how long between the shot at that attacker and the kid entering the bedroom. Possibly seconds (speculating, as I don't know... neither do you). Honestly, have you never been the victim of a violent crime? Do you not have any idea of how fast stuff like this goes down? I do.
quote:

Look I have no sympathy for the crook… glad he’s facing his maker… But I will not praise a boy as a hero when he almost got people killed

I'm not praising him as a hero. Just saying that he may well have taken the best option available in a fucked up situation.





Crush -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 6:46:11 AM)

I've a .38 with laser sights and a shotgun (pump, though I wish it was an autoloader*) for primary defense.  I even went so far as to get a beanbag round for the first round for the shottie.  But after that it is 00 buck.

Self defense does not require a "continuum of force" where you yell stop, then maybe mace or taser, then a firearm.  That's the police.   Citizens who choose to exercise their Federal and State Rights (see link: http://members.iquest.net/~petedrum/ ) pretty much only get to select "shoot to stop", not "reason with/intimidate."

As for the "drug deal gone bad" fantasy/scenario, even drug dealers have a right to protect themselves within their abode from criminals.  That's why the police identify themselves as police when they come storming in (a WHOLE different discussion regarding the federal 4th and 9th Amendments) as operatives of the government (JBTs aside) with authority to engage in domicile entry.
titleAndStar(830,0,0,false,"","")
--
* you won't hear that first round being loaded (cha-chunk, in the movies) into the chamber...it is already there.   And you won't hear the second one, since you'll be temporarily deaf from the first one going off in your direction.





Crush -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 7:07:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/05/03/2009-05-03_teen_tells_of_being_shot_as_cops_fought_thug.html

Brooklyn teen shot by NYPD officer tells of accidental hit BY Brendan Brosh
DAILY NEWS WRITER Sunday, May 3rd 2009, 5:25 AM  DeCrescenzo for News Darnell Williams was hit in the left leg by a stray bullet fired by a New York Police Officer as he stood on a subway platform. A Brooklyn teen who was accidentally shot by cops during a fracas on a subway platform is slowly recovering after being released from the hospital Saturday. Darnell Williams, 17, was grazed by a bullet on Thursday when cops were trying to arrest a screwdriver-wielding panhandler who stabbed a cop.
>more at link<

I guess Police officers shouldn't have firearms either.

ed:  Removed picture before Mod XI got there... ;)


Well that is a silly conclusion.....though under the heading of unintended consequences the story does seem to shine a light on the fact that bullets don't allways hit their intended targets....even when fired by trained LEO's.
Yet most gun enthusiast's will claim more guns make us safer.....the logic behind that claim escapes me.


Ah, the Law of Unintended Consequences...glad I introduced it to you.  It also applies to the scenario in the OP, then doesn't it? 

Bullets don't always hit their intended target.  Most scenarios are three rounds, three yards and three seconds. 

Guns don't make us safer.  Bullets don't make us safer.  Locks and alarms don't make us safer.  Police don't make us safer 99% of the time. 

But knowledge does make us safer. Knowledge from reasonable sources.  knowledge from impartial, peer-reviewed, studies. Logic and reasoning skills to analyze the data for conclusions for ourselves, not just cherry picking or crazy "what if"ing.  And then taking that knowledge to implement it into a plan.

See http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jasoncs/knowledgeactionfinal.pdf

And that knowledge I have gained is what tells me to carry a firearm for self defense, the action I've engaged in doing for only the past couple years. 

----
It is interesting to note that the "Wild Wild West"  and such that were predicted by gun naysayers when people were allowed to carry concealed never happened.  That the stats show that those who DON'T carry are 10 times more likely to be engaged in criminal activities than those who DO carry.   Which I guess means that Sarah Brady is much more likely to mug someone than I am. 

===
It would really be nice for people to do some actual research instead of just shooting off their mouths.






Crush -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 7:27:18 AM)

kd,

1) I can accept your position that you'd rather have your daughter raped than for you to stop the perps.  Though I'm not sure how I'd personally live with the consequences of a daughter who knew their parent who could have done something did nothing to protect me.  I personally would live with the consequences of having had killed those perps, because protecting my child is a higher order call than saving the lives of scumbags.  I just wouldn't want to be your child, that's all.

2) We can propose "what if" scenarios all day...but they are just "what if" scenarios.   There are just some Kobayashi Maru scenarios out there.  And there are some when you are being assaulted by marshmallows .  Neither are very realistic, considering these are the outliers, not the means nor medians of the possible scenarios. 

3) Consider the case of Michael DuBose  http://gunowners.org/op0737.htm It is far more likely a scenario.  And having actually been face to face with a gun myself in a similar setting, it changed my mind about my role in my personal defense.







Crush -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 7:28:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

*fast reply*
After reading this thread I know who's house to rob and who's house not to rob.


You can rob my house, anytime...[;)]


Cool...anything worth having?  If so, just send along the address for me an my homies... (J/K)




rulemylife -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 7:33:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf


There are not any seperate statistics kept by the FBI or DOJ for just Home Invasions, but you can do a search of the FBI webiste and find seperate cases. I only jumped around to a few, and did not find any that support your claims.

What makes you believe your comment is correct?



That's why I used the phrase "it seems as if".

I originally meant to clarify the remark by saying that it was just my own observation from browsing home invasion links, but I posted quickly and forgot to say that.





Jack45 -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 7:56:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Like when I gave up the AK47. I would be too reluctant to use it because after going through an assailant's body it could wind up in a baby's crib across the street.


That Wichita Massacre was brutal but the local city gov treated it with PC gloves, like that couple in TN taken by a group of "youths" including a female and just tortured and mutilated to death. That's not national news of course. But if it was other way around WHOA.

You mentioned the 7.62 x 39mm round.
Had a home invasion not far from here and the guy returned fire with an SKS 5 shots. NONE left the house.
Perp dead, vic alive.
Although I do understand your point.




Crush -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 8:25:30 AM)


Followup for marshmallow guns: 

http://www.instructables.com/id/Marshmallow-gun/
http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/giftsforkids/753d/
http://www.instructables.com/id/Automatic-Marshmallow-Gun/

And then, we have potato guns too.......




kdsub -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 9:53:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


Think about it… if you had a gun and there were 5 people within 8 feet of you could you shoot all 5 before they got you? They had no intention of shooting … they were just scaring.


I wasn't aware that you were not  only present at  the event, but reading the minds of everyone involved. I assume you must have been, because otherwise how could you speak with such certainty?


It has always amazed me how Monday morning quarterbacks are so darn smart, and that their adrenaline would never have pumped, and how everything would have been crystal clear if they had been in such a life or death situation.

So many Clint Eastwoods out there .... [:)]

Firm



Yes I deserved that...lol

But I am truly thinking about the situation... and that is why it does not make sense. Look at it this way... The victims had no forethought but the crooks did. If they were going to kill everyone they would not separate...or they would tie them up or make them get on the floor. And if I were the crook I would not try to shoot all of the men when they were free and that close to me.

Now you are right...would I think of all this at the time... Maybe not but I know if I had the gun and the drop on the crook I would first try to get him to drop his weapon... then shoot if I had too... and I would not miss from that range.

And you can't tell me the guy in the room with the girls was getting ready to rape after the shots in the other room. I think... and I have just as much right as anyone... that the kid was not trained with a weapon... he was shooting wildly and was more of a danger than the crook...and a little girl with two bullets in her proves it.

How many times have we read of people shot by accident during gun battles... more times than mass murders during robberies. That kid with a gun... even though I understand... was lucky he didn't get the girl killed and someone else in another apartment.

I've nothing against guns... but people need to get training not only in how to shoot but when to shoot.

Butch




kittinSol -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 10:37:01 AM)

Edited. Wrong thread. I am blonde.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 10:46:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Edited. Wrong thread. I am blonde.


No no, you can still post here. This thread is open for people of any hair color. Hell, we've even got a bald guy posting here, and nobody's said a word about it!




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 10:48:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I've nothing against guns... but people need to get training not only in how to shoot but when to shoot.



Well, I certainly have no problem agreeing with this, 100%. I think we've reached a point where it should be mandatory for every handgun owner, and possibly every gun owner period.




kittinSol -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 10:56:44 AM)

That would be a good start - just make sure the exam isn't administered by the NRA [&:] .




CreativeDominant -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 12:10:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

That would be a good start - just make sure the exam isn't administered by the NRA [&:] .
Yeah...much better to have classes taught by an organization run by progressives who don't believe in the use of force/violence but who will teach you how to calm the perp and talk to him...or how to hand him your gun so he knows that you are not threatening him and just adding to the insult of the tragic forces that have conspired against him since birth.




kittinSol -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 12:11:24 PM)

Not today, thank you.




FirmhandKY -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 1:04:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

It has always amazed me how Monday morning quarterbacks are so darn smart, and that their adrenaline would never have pumped, and how everything would have been crystal clear if they had been in such a life or death situation.

So many Clint Eastwoods out there .... [:)]


Yes I deserved that...lol

But I am truly thinking about the situation... and that is why it does not make sense. Look at it this way... The victims had no forethought but the crooks did. If they were going to kill everyone they would not separate...or they would tie them up or make them get on the floor. And if I were the crook I would not try to shoot all of the men when they were free and that close to me.

Now you are right...would I think of all this at the time... Maybe not but I know if I had the gun and the drop on the crook I would first try to get him to drop his weapon... then shoot if I had too... and I would not miss from that range.

And you can't tell me the guy in the room with the girls was getting ready to rape after the shots in the other room. I think... and I have just as much right as anyone... that the kid was not trained with a weapon... he was shooting wildly and was more of a danger than the crook...and a little girl with two bullets in her proves it.

How many times have we read of people shot by accident during gun battles... more times than mass murders during robberies. That kid with a gun... even though I understand... was lucky he didn't get the girl killed and someone else in another apartment.

I've nothing against guns... but people need to get training not only in how to shoot but when to shoot.

Butch,

Several comments.

I do believe that you are trying to think through the situation and using critical thinking skills about the entire event.

I do agree that everyone (everyone) should receive training on the use of firearms, preferably as pre-teens, with refreshers throughout their lifetime, and a test prior to the issuance of their mandatory concealed carry permit.

As far as the actual events that we do know:

Any negative outcome (such as the girl getting shot) would solely be the responsibility of the individuals who chose to violate the law, and conduct a home invasion with weapons.  All actions flowed from their illegal decision, even if it was the "hero" who actually shot the girl (which is in question).

It is not the duty nor responsibility (for the most part, in many places) for the innocent people who are being held at gunpoint to try to reason with, or give any sort of benefit of the doubt to the assailants.  The safest, and best thing for them to assume is that they will be murdered, and take appropriate action.

As I mentioned (and you acknowledged) when the shit hits the fan, and you are in such a life or death situation, you have precious little time to think (therefore good training is always preferred), and precious little room to be wrong.  Some people freeze.  Some people panic.  Some people take incorrect, or less than optimum actions.  Some people do the exact right thing, at exactly the right time, in exactly the right order ... and get killed.

Some people take action, and muddle through, and survive.

You, I believe, are "over-analyzing" the situation, without considering the haze of stress, fear and uncertainty.

The "hero" in question took action.  The actions prevented the possiblities of rape and death for 10 people, at the cost of one of the 10 injuried, and one of the assailants dead.

This is a fine outcome, and makes the man who took action - even if some do not believe it was "perfect" - a hero.

Bravo.

Firm




rulemylife -> RE: This is what happens... (5/11/2009 1:06:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

That would be a good start - just make sure the exam isn't administered by the NRA [&:] .
Yeah...much better to have classes taught by an organization run by progressives who don't believe in the use of force/violence but who will teach you how to calm the perp and talk to him...or how to hand him your gun so he knows that you are not threatening him and just adding to the insult of the tragic forces that have conspired against him since birth.


No, better to have the classes taught by those who do not have any vested, ideological views either way.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875