RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LaTigresse -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 11:10:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: couldbemage
Fat folk are tolerated, not idolised.

The very word "tolerated" implies that the thing being tolerated is bad. I don't mistreat fat folk, but I don't think fat is hot.

There is nothing good about being fat, but it's okay to be imperfect. People have faults. Faults are normal.

...and I despise PC people.

Like the whole BBW crowd. Fat makes you not beautiful. Deal with it.

Hey, an ugly face also makes you not beautiful. Life ain't fair.


Since you despise PC people, you should adore me.

In the same vein as your thread we could state that, at least a fat person with a beautiful face has a chance at over all beauty....Whereas people like yourself, with a less than stellar face, is quite, well.....screwed. And sooooo not in a good way.

Not to mention your less than attractive attitude.




ShaktiSama -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 11:12:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavanKael
Perhaps the most important point throughout all of my posts in this thread (Not only the one you chose to highlight) is the ever elusive personal responsibility.


There is no point to be made about "personal responsibility" that requires the use of abusive, venomous, dehumanizing language.  I highlighted the words you used in your post to make it clear that you come across to anyone who does not share your pathological loathing as a foaming-at-the-mouth, hate-besotted lunatic.  Not someone calmly discussing personal responsibility for one's health and well-being.

Your own words say it all, DavanKael.  The fact that you want other people to take responsibility for their bodies while you take none for your mind and heart, to say nothing of the words that you type and speak, also speaks volumes.  As I said earlier in this thread, the "acceptance" of some people is not worth having.  There are a lot of them posting to this thread.




subtlebutterfly -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 11:15:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: couldbemage
Fat folk are tolerated, not idolised.

The very word "tolerated" implies that the thing being tolerated is bad. I don't mistreat fat folk, but I don't think fat is hot.

There is nothing good about being fat, but it's okay to be imperfect. People have faults. Faults are normal.

...and I despise PC people.

Like the whole BBW crowd. Fat makes you not beautiful. Deal with it.

Hey, an ugly face also makes you not beautiful. Life ain't fair.


Since you despise PC people, you should adore me.

In the same vein as your thread we could state that, at least a fat person with a beautiful face has a chance at over all beauty....Whereas people like yourself, with a less than stellar face, is quite, well.....screwed. And sooooo not in a good way.

Not to mention your less than attractive attitude.



*goes off to find the wipers for da laptop..bed..clothes ya name it*..geeeeez at least put up a warning sign will ya![:D] ..but oh so true[:-]




sirsholly -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 11:20:45 AM)

quote:

Hey, an ugly face also makes you not beautiful. Life ain't fair.


Beauty takes many forms, cupcake. Outer beauty fades with time, but inner beauty is a lifetime of joy to those who are blessed to know the possessor.

Your friends are not blessed, imho






LadyPact -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 11:35:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: couldbemage
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact The fact that you even used the word "fatties" leads Me to believe otherwise.

Fat folk are tolerated, not idolised.

The very word "tolerated" implies that the thing being tolerated is bad. I don't mistreat fat folk, but I don't think fat is hot.

There is nothing good about being fat, but it's okay to be imperfect. People have faults. Faults are normal.

...and I despise PC people.

Like the whole BBW crowd. Fat makes you not beautiful. Deal with it.

Hey, an ugly face also makes you not beautiful. Life ain't fair.


Well, we tolerate ignorant, superficial types in the lifestyle, too, so I guess we're even.

Oddly enough, I can't recall a single event that I've attended that anyone made Me aware that I was being tolerated because I'm not thin.  I don't remember it ever being a barrier to becoming a decent top.  Never once have I heard anyone say they didn't want to attend a demo of Mine due to My weight.

Life should be interesting when I get to CA in a few months.





Daddyluvsitrough -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 12:54:28 PM)

Are obese people not accepted by society?  I wouldn't go so far as to say they are embraced, but accepted yes.  What I don't agree with is the movement that many are pushing to accept overweight as not only normal, but that it can be a healthy standard, as well as obesity as a new standard of beauty.  Why does the term "BBW" exist?  Many BBWs who claim to be proud of their shapely figure are the first to be upset at men that don't care for that body type.  Or the facade that so many BBWs are truly happy with their figure and the way they look and could care less if a man doesn't like that - yet watch the fur fly if someone brings up their weight. 

"Oh but you don't know if an obese person is healthy or not".  Well the next time I see someone 400+ lbs. run a 4 hour marathon I'll eat crow (okay that's an extreme but you get my point).  I thought the increase risk of heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, etc. is pretty much common knowledge as possible pitfalls for those people who are obese - regardless of whether they are one of the blessed "healthy but obese" types.  And I'm not referring to someone who's a bit chubby and trying to lose a pesky 20 lbs, I mean someone who's really heavy.

If our culture wasn't so PC about the weight issue - people would be more inclined to eat right, exercise and take care of themselves.  Instead of taking a pill for depression because you're upset about your weight and gaining further weight from anti-depressants, why not try an exercise regimen and better nutriton?  Because few people are willing to put forth the effort - everyone wants the magic pill solution to happiness.  Pushing obesity as a new norm or needing more acceptance is basically telling those in society that "it's okay" to continue to do further damage to their bodies and potentially cause themselves health problems.  I'm not saying that name-calling is appropriate - I made an off-color comment about a 400 lb. man who went through 2 bags of McDonald's and 5-6 cokes on a 4 hour flight next to me, and I was angry that he wasn't required to purchase a 2nd seat when I was subjected to his girth and body odor.  I apologize for my sadistic & mean side to come up in that example.  But the whole "big is beautiful" agenda and pushing for more acceptance of obese people, just so that they can feel warm & fuzzy about their bodies is just another form of enabling.  Is it mean to tell a heavy drug user or the person smoking 3-packs of Marlboros a day to quit abusing their bodies?   I don't see why unhealthy weight problems should be any different - and that goes for the anorexic types, too. 





ShaktiSama -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 1:34:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly
Beauty takes many forms, cupcake. Outer beauty fades with time, but inner beauty is a lifetime of joy to those who are blessed to know the possessor.


As a photographer who works with people of all ages, I will go one further than this:  outer beauty can be actively spoiled by a person who has an ugly personality.  Whereas inner beauty can shine through, even in a photograph, if that beauty resonates in the viewer as well.

The scarring power of inner ugliness is visible even in childhood and teen years, but becomes more and more powerful as we age.  Our habitual expressions and emotions carve their impressions into our faces.  There is nothing that will mutilate your face more savagely than a habitual sneer of contempt, and other forms of emotional stress, especially anger, frustration and anxiety, will also leave their mark.

No amount of plastic surgery can hide or heal that kind of damage.  It whittles flesh and bone over the years into a fright mask.  Personally, I would a thousand times rather photograph a sexy, happy fat girl of any age than a  person burdened by hate.  There are some things that Photoshop just cannot fix.




lronitulstahp -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 1:54:18 PM)

quote:

a fat person with a beautiful face

Ms LaT, you have GOT to stop talking about me so much. i'm blushing....[sm=flowers.gif]

~tulip, proudly a BBW

and if i ever thin out a bit, still proudly a BBW, because i'm counting the size of my heart, and it's capacity to love and accept people for who they are inside. It's a wonderful thing to see past the shell...i wouldn't wish shallowness on my worst enemy.






DavanKael -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 2:20:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavanKael
Perhaps the most important point throughout all of my posts in this thread (Not only the one you chose to highlight) is the ever elusive personal responsibility.


There is no point to be made about "personal responsibility" that requires the use of abusive, venomous, dehumanizing language.  I highlighted the words you used in your post to make it clear that you come across to anyone who does not share your pathological loathing as a foaming-at-the-mouth, hate-besotted lunatic.  Not someone calmly discussing personal responsibility for one's health and well-being.

Your own words say it all, DavanKael.  The fact that you want other people to take responsibility for their bodies while you take none for your mind and heart, to say nothing of the words that you type and speak, also speaks volumes.  As I said earlier in this thread, the "acceptance" of some people is not worth having.  There are a lot of them posting to this thread.


You don't have the IQ points or the credibility/consistency 'put me in my place' as you seek to do, so I'd suggest you cease and desist. 
I'd also point out, with amusement, that you ought look in the mirror regarding your conceptualization of me. 
I know precisely the intent of my words and the content of my heart and mind.  The likes of you is not something to which I feel the need to justify anything. 
I am a person who takes personal accountability and responsibility and it is wholly accurate to conclude that the extent of my replies in this thread centered around that: Personal Responsibility. 
You looked at my profile, so if you have something additional to say to me, by all means, cmail me. 
Davan




DavanKael -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 2:22:37 PM)

Editing error, sorry folks!  :> 




ShaktiSama -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 3:15:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavanKael

I am a person who takes personal accountability and responsibility and it is wholly accurate to conclude that the extent of my replies in this thread centered around that: Personal Responsibility. 


I'm going to ignore the nonsense which has nothing to do with the main disagreement, because I have no insecurities about my "IQ" or "credibility".  Nor am I particularly interested in putting you "in your place".  In this thread, I am more interested in putting your words and attitudes in context.

That's why I checked your profile, since you mention it:  when you started ranting about your "tax dollars" being spent on obese people and their medical difficulties, I thought I should check and see if you were living in a country with nationalized health care.  If you were, at least there might be SOME slim connection to reality  in your "livid" frothing.

Given that you were probably born American and presently live in a country without nationalized health care, however, your remarks are not only vicious and hateful, but completely without any justification.  It is far more likely that you are just another typical American bully wielding the truncheon of typical American "I am injured by those weaker than myself" rhetoric against a target which has no political or social power to defend itself.  What a surprise.

You can retreat to the bastion of arguing "personal responsibility" if you like, but it does not change the ugly tone and dripping malice in your use of language.  If you're scientifically and medically minded, how about you check these statistics:  when trying to get others to accept personal responsibility and change their lives for the better, how effective is the strategy of treating them as if they are not worthwhile human beings?

Only persons have personal responsibility.  Dehumanization and persecution do not make better, stronger humans, and words like yours do not encourage healthy, responsible self-maintenance.  On the contrary, they encourage self-loathing, neurosis and self-destruction.  You and others like you are an entropic force, not a positive force.  That's the long and the short of it.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 4:05:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly
Beauty takes many forms, cupcake. Outer beauty fades with time, but inner beauty is a lifetime of joy to those who are blessed to know the possessor.


As a photographer who works with people of all ages, I will go one further than this:  outer beauty can be actively spoiled by a person who has an ugly personality.  Whereas inner beauty can shine through, even in a photograph, if that beauty resonates in the viewer as well.

The scarring power of inner ugliness is visible even in childhood and teen years, but becomes more and more powerful as we age.  Our habitual expressions and emotions carve their impressions into our faces.  There is nothing that will mutilate your face more savagely than a habitual sneer of contempt, and other forms of emotional stress, especially anger, frustration and anxiety, will also leave their mark.

No amount of plastic surgery can hide or heal that kind of damage.  It whittles flesh and bone over the years into a fright mask.  Personally, I would a thousand times rather photograph a sexy, happy fat girl of any age than a  person burdened by hate.  There are some things that Photoshop just cannot fix.



"your face will freeze that way"!  It's true. 




DavanKael -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 4:12:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavanKael

I am a person who takes personal accountability and responsibility and it is wholly accurate to conclude that the extent of my replies in this thread centered around that: Personal Responsibility. 


I'm going to ignore the nonsense which has nothing to do with the main disagreement, because I have no insecurities about my "IQ" or "credibility".  Nor am I particularly interested in putting you "in your place".  In this thread, I am more interested in putting your words and attitudes in context.

That's why I checked your profile, since you mention it:  when you started ranting about your "tax dollars" being spent on obese people and their medical difficulties, I thought I should check and see if you were living in a country with nationalized health care.  If you were, at least there might be SOME slim connection to reality  in your "livid" frothing.

Given that you were probably born American and presently live in a country without nationalized health care, however, your remarks are not only vicious and hateful, but completely without any justification.  It is far more likely that you are just another typical American bully wielding the truncheon of typical American "I am injured by those weaker than myself" rhetoric against a target which has no political or social power to defend itself.  What a surprise.

You can retreat to the bastion of arguing "personal responsibility" if you like, but it does not change the ugly tone and dripping malice in your use of language.  If you're scientifically and medically minded, how about you check these statistics:  when trying to get others to accept personal responsibility and change their lives for the better, how effective is the strategy of treating them as if they are not worthwhile human beings?

Only persons have personal responsibility.  Dehumanization and persecution do not make better, stronger humans, and words like yours do not encourage healthy, responsible self-maintenance.  On the contrary, they encourage self-loathing, neurosis and self-destruction.  You and others like you are an entropic force, not a positive force.  That's the long and the short of it.



The question of my words being put into context has already been achieved: by me.  I contextualized my distaste for victim playing when there is a choice.  Most obese people have a choice in being that way. 
I found humorous your conceptualizing my words as hateful then using words that could also be construed as hateful in your conceptualization of me. 
Clearly, you re not as versed in the medical systems at work in the United States as you think.  I worked in a venue that accepted medical assistance.  As such, I educated myself on that particular state-funded option.  In my state, one who is 100 lbs. or more overweight and on medical assistance can have gastric bypass surgery paid for by medical assistance (Which, if you're not familiar with the program, is state subsidized and, in part, taxpayer funded).   That is only one example of a way that tax dollars are being spent for self-induced health issues. 
Now, from a personal perspective, which is what I generally speak from when I am speaking on here (Unless I denote otherwise), this offends me.  Greatly.  Most obese people are that way because of their personal choices and I wholly disagree with money that, in part does come from my tax dollars, going to fund a procedure related most likely to a person's chosen lack of healthfulness. 
From a professional perspective, I have actually had to deal with the state funding of that procedure head-on.  Professionally, I looked at, first and foremost, the welfare of my client.  I listened to what the client wanted, why, took that into consideration with health, diagnoses, medications, etc.  It's a dangerous procedure (Upto a 3% mortality rate), you know, and not some 'magic nip and tuck' that so many people want: it often has substantial implications and a fair bit of the time doesn't actually acheive long-term weight loss because the behaviors that caused the obesity aren't necessarily changed (And, if you do the research, you'll see that lack of behavioral change is the major reason for weight re-gain after such a procedure).  I sought the input of fellow professionals as well.  You see, part of doing what I do ethically is to be able to put the client first and whatever personal thoughts I have need to either be tended to and placed elsewhere or if I thought I could not do what was best for my client in my professional estimation, I would have referred the case elsewhere.  It's not about ego, it's about ethics and welfare of a person in one's care. 
You mentioned statistics but did not cite any and, as such, I can't speak to what you may have been referencing there. 
Again, I stand by anything I have said.  That is my choice and my responsibility.  You're entitled to draw whatever conclusions you wish.  That's your choice and your responsibility. 
Again, reiterating the same as I have throughout: the crux of the matter is personal responsibility (Not only about weight but about everything). 
Davan




DemonKia -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 4:20:36 PM)

FR, after read thru

*carefully tiptoes around other posters to address an issue that got my attention*

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as well as in the heart of the beautiful. In my book 'pretty' is the term I use for surface attractiveness. & 'beauty' is the word I use for that loveliness of soul & heart that can be seen by the discerning, & can be most important to the connoisseur . . . .

In my mind, the ability to see beauty is a cultivatable capacity. Those who close themselves off to the beauty that is all around are impoverished by their own senses & consciousness . . . . . . I feel for them, but also feel helpless to lead the blind to eyes & make them see . . . . . . .

I've learned something important, to me, in pursuing Demon-Kia-the-artist. Making pretty art out of pretty things (pretty people, flowers, butterflies, whatever) is relatively easy; showing the beauty in that which is conventionally considered 'ugly' is something else entirely. & if one likes pretty art of pretty subject matter, groovy. But personally my admiration goes to someone like Joel-Peter Witkin for tackling the difficult stuff, making what I consider 'great art' out of what others would see as the 'ugly' . . . . . . Heinlein really dissected this distinction well in the uncut 'Stranger', in Jubal's discussion with Ben about sculpture . . . . . .

&, for me, this is no theoretical, this is an actual concrete reality. I have at least one woman (other than myself) whom I helped 'do healing work' around her perception of herself, thru photography. A not-terribly-conventionally 'pretty' woman, who more importantly despised photos of herself before we started working together, & is now something of a photography slut . . . . . lol . . . . . If the mind wants to change its perception, 'miracles' are possible . . . . . .




DavanKael -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 4:37:18 PM)

Hi Demon Kia----
I love, absolutely love, that you referenced the discussion Jubal and Ben had in "Stranger..." 
I think you're talking about the aged woman's sculpture when Ben says it's ugly, saying the mermaid figure is far more beautiful, and Jubal goes on to discuss why the woman is the most beautiful thing he's ever seen because through the 'ugliness' of age, one can see the beauty shine through.  That spiritual sense is what I believe you are discussing as well as what Jubal was discussing.  So true!  :> 
Jubal also 'schools' Ben on another sculpture Rodin's 'Fallen Caryatid'/'Caryatid Fallen Under Her Stone'.  I truly love and begin to grok that sculpture; I have a copy of it (And did, actually, before I'd read "Stranger..." in its entirety).  That work, Jubal tells Ben, is a monument to those people who went down trying, those who shouldered burdens that were far too heavy to bear; he speaks of honor and duty.  He waxes wonderfully poetic about the diminutive female form and how she was doomed to be crushed under the column.  He champions the antithesis of victim playing; he sings the praises of determination and fortitude in the face of certain defeat.
Thank you for the smile your reference gave me!  :> 
  Davan




SlaveBlutarsky -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 4:41:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

The fact that you even used the word "fatties" leads Me to believe otherwise.
As a fat guy, I'm not going to let you demonize one of my favorite words.

Signed,

Fatty McFattFatt




couldbemage -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 4:54:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:

ORIGINAL: couldbemage
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact The fact that you even used the word "fatties" leads Me to believe otherwise.
Fat folk are tolerated, not idolised. The very word "tolerated" implies that the thing being tolerated is bad. I don't mistreat fat folk, but I don't think fat is hot. There is nothing good about being fat, but it's okay to be imperfect. People have faults. Faults are normal. ...and I despise PC people. Like the whole BBW crowd. Fat makes you not beautiful. Deal with it. Hey, an ugly face also makes you not beautiful. Life ain't fair.
Well, we tolerate ignorant, superficial types in the lifestyle, too, so I guess we're even. Oddly enough, I can't recall a single event that I've attended that anyone made Me aware that I was being tolerated because I'm not thin.  I don't remember it ever being a barrier to becoming a decent top.  Never once have I heard anyone say they didn't want to attend a demo of Mine due to My weight. Life should be interesting when I get to CA in a few months.

This reads like fevrent dissagreement, but is actually in agreement with my original point.

I would suppose that most the people that anwered the OP with "no" really meant that bdsm folk don't find fat any more attractive that 'nillas do. The difference being that "we" don't heap abuse on unnattractive people.

I, of course, failed to see this phenomenon through rose goggles. I even had the temerity to eschew PC terminology. Even diss the BBW lunies.

Adjective plus qualifier deletes adjective.

Fat is not good. Pretending it is doesn't make it so. Changing words doesn't help either.

The personal attacks... hah!

At least 2 people responded with some varient of "beauty doesn't exist/matter" Which is what you really mean when you say everyone is beautiful.




CarrieO -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 5:09:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andalusite

There's a big difference between being unattracted to people based on their weight, and being cruel to them. If you don't want to date one, don't initiate it, and if they contact you first, turn them down politely.


After reading through this entire thread....which could almost be considered torture....The above quote is, in my honest opinion, the best way to deal with someone you aren't attracted to. Plain and simple.

Op...obviously, the answer to your question is no. People are only human and with that comes all the judgements, hostility, and all the many ways they show how deep their loathing for others can run. I find it all sad that people have no problem being this way.
However, it does make it so much easier to better understand some who have chosen to post here and to know how pleased I am that I don't have to be in the same space with such negative energy.





couldbemage -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 5:12:43 PM)

BTW, I work for the american socialized health care system.

And I eat human babies with tabasco.
(something for the bradbury firefighters)




ShaktiSama -> RE: Are BDSMers better at size acceptance? (5/18/2009 5:14:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: couldbemage
This reads like fevrent dissagreement, but is actually in agreement with my original point.


[Pepe LaPeu]Your post, she sez "yoa ahr a douchebag", but your eyes, zey say "oui!"[/Pepe LaPeu]






Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875