TaurusMCMLVIII
Posts: 88
Joined: 1/20/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ShadowHwk You know, I always have to laugh at those who speak in such definitive ways about what someone can or cannot do. Yes I am laughing at your statement. Maybe in YOUR experience it has not happened. I am glad to provide you with a good laugh. ANd you are certainly correct about at least one thing which is that it has not happened in my experience nor have I seen it done by anyone else. Though after some thought, I was wondering why anyone would want to since it is as much fun getting there as it is in arriving. You state something as a fact, yet you offer no evidence, you also don’t offer anything in the way of medical credentials so that we may infer that you know what your talking about. I guess it's my turn for a good laugh (maybe we should start a comedy routine). Why is that that the person offering an opposing opinion needs to have medical credetials and a thesis research paper yet those that offer the initial theory are able to state whatever they want? So we can only assume you are simply speaking from your experience (obviously somewhat more limited than others on this board), rather than a formal psychological study of some sort. Please don't take it personally. Your words indicate some aggression. I didn't mean to insult anyone. Just my own opinion at this point. Though I doubt I will spend anytime "researching" this just to prove a point. But I would be happy to read the study you are basing your opinion on. And yes I have heard about the conditioning of physical response (who hasn't) but that study only proves that dogs can be trained to drool when a bell is rung. It is useful to use as a basis for theory in other areas. But it is just that, another theory. And until a study is conducted to prove orgasm on command with physical stimulation then I'll stick to my opinion. But, contrary to your statements, there is a large body of evidence and documentation that a Pavlovian response to a given stimulus can be induced in humans. Are you saying that the body of evidence is incorrect and that there is no such thing as a Pavlovian response? No not at all. My comment above explains my position a little. To further illustrate let me offer this. Yes some physical responses can be trained but it is limited. I can't train someone to bleed on command just because I put them through training similar to Pavlo's experiment. Or are you saying that it is impossible for a woman to be so conditioned that her Pavlovian response to a given stimulus is an orgasm? Yes That is my position. Now I will say there is some grey area to the amount of physical stimulus needed. And as I said before, the mental requirements are more important. But if there is truly no physical stimulus involved at all and no mental stimulus other than a verbal command(s) then a woman will not orgasm. As for a woman faking - I am quite sure it happens - that part of your post sounds like you are speaking from experience. My ego doesn't need that particular stroke, never has. If you have a problem with them "faking it" maybe your making too big a deal out of it. If she doesn't cum, she doesn't cum - not a big deal one way or the other. *laugh* I know that *I* cum and I enjoy it. Terry As I said before, I was just offering my opinion and not trying to "convert" anyone. I thought that was what message boards were all about. But if I offer an opinion and then get insulted about my sexual experiences then I guess the BDSM community just isn't as open-minded as it pretends to be. Oh, and I am glad to hear that you cum and enjoy it. After all, isn't that what this is all about? John
|