KnightofMists -> RE: How to aquire Power and Control akin to Ownership without Slavery (2/7/2006 4:04:16 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JohnWarren quote:
ORIGINAL: SubjectProperty Well the Lawyers,Psychiatrists,Social workers,involved in the case of the women who is notw a lifelong owned slave by vertue of her adult guardianship,clearly have not been disbarred nor will they be. Was that "not" or "now"? But the practical matter remains how one can know that a lawyer won't be disbarred in the future. Obviously, psychiarists and social workers can only lose their license. Now, while the requirements of an "Adult Guardianship" or "Guardian ad litem" varies from state to state. Most of the ones about which I'm aware require affirmation that the person be disabled in some form in such a way that the state needs to appoint someone to protect him or her against neglect, exploitation, or abuse. In the case of someone seeking the situation in the way you are putting forth, I strongly believe that a certain degree of falsification and fabrication would be necessary to obtain the required order leading to a situation were accessories in the matter would, indeed, be subject to licensure review. This would be particularly if the "slave" decided to leave the relationship and took action to get his or her rights back. It's a nice fantasy, but it certainly opens up a huge potential downside. Well I would add this bite of thought as well If indeed it is true that a adult as gained Adult Guardianship over a competent adult in mind... just for the sake of lifestyle perferrences. Are they really legally owned? This guardain ship is as you say at the least as been gained by falsification and frabrications. Or at worse.. the professionals in the case willing ignor the basic laws that govern the applications of Adult Guardianship. So, just because the Guardianship is obtained... it could only be obtained thru false pretenses, making the guardianship null and void.... Even if it is never found out by legal authorities, in principle it not legal and therefore, a claim of ownership based on legal claims would be false
|
|
|
|