Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:08:51 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Passed the Oklahoma bar, have you?  There were co-workers in the place he was defending, and there is no way to say he believed the danger to be over to them.  Remember, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.


Yes, I truly love NRA propaganda slogans but they are of little use in court as Dirty Harry the pharmacist is about to find out.

The laws in Oklahoma are similar to everywhere else, with the noted exception of Oklahoma being one of the handful
of states that have extended castle laws to a person's vehicle and place of business. 

Despite that broad definition he was still arrested.  So one has to believe that there were reasonable grounds for the arrest.



one reasonable ground (or unreasonable one) is that a riot would have ensued had they not arrested him.

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:10:52 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Would the law not allow him to return and make sure his co-workers were safe ?


Which is another thing interesting here that everyone seems to be focusing on.

Were his co-workers paralyzed by fear and unable to move? 

Is there any reason why they needed the protection of the pharmacist when they could have walked out the door just as he did?



< Message edited by rulemylife -- 5/31/2009 4:12:02 PM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:13:47 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Would the law not allow him to return and make sure his co-workers were safe ?


Which is another thing interesting here that everyone seems to be focusing on.

Were his co-workers paralyzed by fear and unable to move? 

Is there any reason why they needed the protection of the pharmacist when they could have walked out the door just as he did?




you would hear gunshots in your place or employment and run out there thinking it was safe to walk out the door?  id be headin to a good hiding place to shit my pants i think......since i aint allowed to carry a gun to work.

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:15:00 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Exactly RML, but the point is we can only guess. All the facts should come out in court ( Not that thats a given )

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:25:14 PM   
Crush


Posts: 1031
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

Actually, you don't know that he won't be firing back under his arm.  You know he is armed.   Therefore, shooting him in the back is reasonable and defensible. 

Source:  FBI Citizen's Academy. 



Well, you provided a source but not a link, but I can tell you without even seeing it that a private citizen does not have the options available to trained law enforcement personnel.



Actually, it was at one of these Citizens Academies that I attended that I heard it from an FBI agent who was part of the Academy..  And he stated that we had the same legal rights as law enforcement officers, and in some cases, even more, since we aren't required to identify ourselves or  follow a force continuum, like many police and other law enforcement officers are required to follow.

There is no link, nor is one needed, since I am the source regarding the Academy that I attended.



_____________________________

"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination." -- Mark Twain

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:31:44 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

you would hear gunshots in your place or employment and run out there thinking it was safe to walk out the door?  id be headin to a good hiding place to shit my pants i think......since i aint allowed to carry a gun to work.


Well. this is really starting to drift away into a lot of speculation.

The only thing it really comes down to is whether the injured robber could reasonably have been thought to be a threat and whether the response was proportional to that threat.

Based on the limited facts it would appear to be no to both questions.

Especially considering that the state has strong laws in favor of self-defense and the district attorney is fully supporting the police charges against the pharmacist.



(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:35:30 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Well. this is really starting to drift away into a lot of speculation.

The only thing it really comes down to is whether the injured robber could reasonably have been thought to be a threat and whether the response was proportional to that threat.

Based on the limited facts it would appear to be no to both questions.



How can you be sure, since you admit we have only limited facts ?  I may agree with you if we had CCTV showing the guy on the floor wasn`t a danger. Since we don`t, I have to keep an open mind.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:37:10 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

Actually, it was at one of these Citizens Academies that I attended that I heard it from an FBI agent who was part of the Academy..  And he stated that we had the same legal rights as law enforcement officers, and in some cases, even more, since we aren't required to identify ourselves or  follow a force continuum, like many police and other law enforcement officers are required to follow.

There is no link, nor is one needed, since I am the source regarding the Academy that I attended.




He was wrong.

You need only look to the pharmacist's arrest as proof of that.

(in reply to Crush)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:40:31 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

How can you be sure, since you admit we have only limited facts ?  I may agree with you if we had CCTV showing the guy on the floor wasn`t a danger. Since we don`t, I have to keep an open mind.


I can't be, but you edited my comments to leave out the primary sentence in my argument:

Especially considering that the state has strong laws in favor of self-defense and the district attorney is fully supporting the police charges against the pharmacist.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:53:36 PM   
Crush


Posts: 1031
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

Actually, it was at one of these Citizens Academies that I attended that I heard it from an FBI agent who was part of the Academy..  And he stated that we had the same legal rights as law enforcement officers, and in some cases, even more, since we aren't required to identify ourselves or  follow a force continuum, like many police and other law enforcement officers are required to follow.

There is no link, nor is one needed, since I am the source regarding the Academy that I attended.




He was wrong.

You need only look to the pharmacist's arrest as proof of that.



*sigh*   The FBI agent wasn't wrong.  Nor were the other agents and supervisors in the room.  Nor the lawyer that was there.. 

The pharmacist isn't convicted.  People who are arrested are, ya know, actually innocent a lot of the time.  And they still get arrested.  It isn't the cop's call...it is the DA's call to pursue any charges.

But then,  I remember now to never expect a reasonable discussion with you.  Just a rethumping of your own prejudices and fixations.

Buh Bye once more.

Ed:  Note to Mod XI.  I promise to not reply to rule anymore ;)


< Message edited by Crush -- 5/31/2009 4:55:18 PM >


_____________________________

"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination." -- Mark Twain

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:53:57 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I realise I edited your comment RML. Would the police and DA be duty bound to let a court decide the case, even if they felt the pharmacist wasnt guilty ?

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 4:58:17 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
      Well lemme see here, RML.  District Attorneys tend to be elected officials, and this is a high profile case, with heavy racial overtones.  I'd say we need to wait and see how the DA actually proceeds with the case, to judge how fully supportive of it he is...

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 5:09:49 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
The short answer is no.

That is the job of the prosecutor, to determine if there are legal grounds to go to trial.  If there aren't he not only wastes taxpayer's money but subjects himself to not only ridicule but legal sanction.  Remember the Duke University rape case?

But again we are getting back into this whole "feelings" thing.  What the police or district attorney feel is not a relevant legal issue. 

The only relevant issue is whether a law has been broken and if there is reasonable evidence to prove that and take a case to trial.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 5:17:40 PM   
WyldHrt


Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

He was wrong.
You need only look to the pharmacist's arrest as proof of that.

Ummm... say what? Since when does an arrest constitute proof of anything? I can tell you that anyone expressing such a sentiment during voir dire for jury selection would be tossed out on their ass for having prejudged the defendant. 


_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 6:24:10 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
I never said not arrested, I said as a defense. Also, it has happened here in Atlanta. I searched for a while and could not find the news story. It occured Aug 15, 1993 in Atlanta, GA. The DA charged the man, he made bail, and was aquitted by a jury. It was determined that he was in fact defending the lives of others, by stopping the fleeing dangerous felon.

I will keep looking for the news story in an archive search engine I know of. As I said, the law is not absolute and is interpretable.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Shooting a fleeing suspect in the back, no matter what crime he is believed to have committed would not fall under the umbrella of justifiable homicide.




_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 6:36:57 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kazzaslave

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi



Maybe he wanted to make sure the kid never robbed someone again and thought if he goes to court he will get off on a light sentence.


Greetings thishereboi,

That is not for the pharmacist to decide and is not justification for shooting skimaskguy 5 more times in the stomach. This is where vigilante justice comes into play and that's against the law.

she wishes you well,

kazza

edited to fix quote



Hey kazza

Dont get me wrong, I don't think he was right. I was just speculating on why he might have done it. In fact as I said previously, I have trouble believing he thought he was in such danger that he had to pop 5 more rounds into the kid. As you pointed out in your last post, he didn't look back when he went to get the gun and if he thought the kid was about to jump up, that doesn't make sense. I am also not sure where the other two employees were as I didn't see them in the video.


calli

< Message edited by thishereboi -- 5/31/2009 6:38:38 PM >


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 6:40:56 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
" Justifiable homicide can also involve one person killing another for the purpose of self defense. If a person reasonably believes that s/he is in imminent danger of losing their life or suffering great bodily injury at the hands of another person, any self defense that results in death may be considered justifiable homicide. Usually for self defense to be considered justifiable homicide, there is a general duty to retreat if it is possible to do so (with the exception of the state of Louisiana where there is no duty to retreat). A duty to retreat may not be necessary if the justifiable homicide took place in the defendant's home or place of business. "

http://www.criminal-law-lawyer-source.com/terms/justifiable.html

" In some cases, before using force that is likely to cause death or serious bodily harm to the aggressor, a person who is under attack should attempt to retreat or escape, but only if an exit is reasonably possible. Courts have held, however, that a person is not required to flee from his own home, the fenced ground surrounding the home, his place of business, or his automobile. "

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/self-defense

Also here is a link to oppose your unsupported claim that a private citizen cannot kill a fleeing felon, as at least one state supports it:

"Kentucky law holds that a person witnessing a felony must take affirmative steps to prevent it, if possible. (See Gill v. Commonwealth, 235 KY 351 (1930.)
Indeed, Kentucky citizens are permitted to kill fleeing felons while making a citizen's arrest (Kentucky Criminal Code § 37; S 43, §44.) "

http://www.constitution.org/grossack/arrest.htm

If you read the Kentucky law, a private citizen is under obligation of law to stop a felony if they are able to do so.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 6:42:17 PM   
janiebelle


Posts: 332
Joined: 4/29/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

        And you are basing that on what exactly, RML?  We don't know just how injured he was to begin with.  We don't know what caliber gun was being employed (a .45, five shots would likely be overkill, a .25, five might have been just right).  We don't know the magazine capacity.  The time compression on the tape makes it tricky to tell, but he might have simply emptied the sceond gun as fast as he could pull the trigger.  (That would also blow Rule's 'hired killer' hypothesis out of the water, since a professional killer wouldn't waste ammo like that  )

IIRC, the first shot was a .380, which is basically an underpowered 9mm.
I wouldn't count on a head shot from anything other than point blank to be a sure show stopper.
The second gun, a Taurus Judge revolver, would be a far superior weapon in terms of stopping power.  I can therefore see the rationale behind swapping guns.  The strategy follows the gunfighter's axiom about using a pistol to get to your primary weapon. 
Having two guns in no way indicates premeditation.  If it did, I would be five times as "premeditating" as this pharmacist with what lies about this house.  You cannot choose your battlefield, but you can prepare.  I keep a loaded weapon in every room of my house.  Yes, every room, they make stainless guns for steamy bathrooms because nude CQB is not a sound tactical decision.
j

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 6:45:26 PM   
beargonewild


Posts: 22716
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
.....
Shooting a fleeing suspect in the back, no matter what crime he is believed to have committed would not fall under the umbrella of justifiable homicide.


Actually, you don't know that he won't be firing back under his arm.  You know he is armed.   Therefore, shooting him in the back is reasonable and defensible. 

Source:  FBI Citizen's Academy. 



One question: Does that apply to the average citizen or only to FBI agents and FBI trainees?


_____________________________

Do Not Rile da Chosen Bear

Promiscuous boy you already know
That I’m all yours what you waiting for?

Resident MANWHORE ~1000 Bear pts~

10 NZ points
Whips~n~Cuffs

(in reply to Crush)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder - 5/31/2009 6:46:07 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
.380 make excellent hold out weapons, and you are correct they should not be the primary, but a .40 cal can ;). I suppose I walked around for almost 7 years premeditating murder and never knew it.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to janiebelle)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pharmacist shoots robber - charged with murder Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.869