RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or necessary?

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or necessary?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or necessary?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or n... - 6/25/2009 11:42:36 AM

CaptainSex

Posts: 34
Joined: 5/15/2008
Status: offline

The crackers own the majority of institutions, yet feel persecuted? Please! While I am a nationalist (Canadian!) I do however appreciate the fact that people choose my country to work and live in. BNP are no different from the Nazi party.

(in reply to Crush)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or n... - 6/25/2009 12:38:42 PM

rulemylife

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

Sure, you can have an "X-only" party. Just expect there to be some outcry against it.

Bald-headed men, unite! If you aren't genetically bald (less than 5000 hairs) then we don't want you in the crew! No shavers. No depilliators. Only naturally bald men.

Segregation is segregation. Society may frown on it, but it is still going to happen in large and in small ways.

(LEFTIES UNITE FOR A BETTER PAIR OF SCISSORS!)

There may be some merit to that if there was ever widespread discrimination against bald men.

What you are arguing against are organizations started to combat segregation and trying to now say they are segregationists.

(in reply to Crush)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or n... - 6/25/2009 3:15:39 PM

Jack45

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline

quote:

The fact is that the Democratic party is made up of lots of different people, and we’re all minorities in our party. That’s the way it’s been for a long, long time. We’re the party of opportunity. So the demographic trends favor the Democrats.

If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican Party.

National Public Radio on Friday, August 15, 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee

The Freudian slip! Dean is saying the GOP can have white male America.
The inexplicable immigration laws that are destined to make Whites a minority in their own land within 20 years were never voted upon by the American people, they were never asked if they wanted to be replaced. I don't think they will go away without a fight. Do you?

(in reply to LadyEllen)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: is a "whites only" party acceptable? or n... - 6/25/2009 4:09:50 PM

Crush

Posts: 1031
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crush

Sure, you can have an "X-only" party. Just expect there to be some outcry against it.

Bald-headed men, unite! If you aren't genetically bald (less than 5000 hairs) then we don't want you in the crew! No shavers. No depilliators. Only naturally bald men.

Segregation is segregation. Society may frown on it, but it is still going to happen in large and in small ways.

(LEFTIES UNITE FOR A BETTER PAIR OF SCISSORS!)

There may be some merit to that if there was ever widespread discrimination against bald men.

What you are arguing against are organizations started to combat segregation and trying to now say they are segregationists.

ex: NAACP for your point.

Bald men do get discriminated against, but sometimes discriminated for. After all, we know that it is an increase in testosterone that causes most baldness.... (Yeah, I know...not the same testosterone....)

There is significant cultural discrimination against Lefties...we just deal with it. What a concept.

ed to add: I don't really care if people want to segregate themselves or not. It is when they cross the "fist to face" line that matters. Or to quote Gump: "Stupid is as Stupid Does."

< Message edited by Crush -- 6/25/2009 4:11:20 PM >

_____________________________

"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination." -- Mark Twain

(in reply to rulemylife)

Profile

Post #: 24