darchChylde
Posts: 5279
Joined: 9/28/2006 From: Warm Springs, GA but i live in San Francisco. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LotusSong quote:
ORIGINAL: NightTigress quote:
A woman can satisfy upto 5 men (3 holes, 2 hands-no waiting) at one time..when a guy can service 5 women equally at one time.. then poly might be a valid option :) you are forgetting about the times the girls play with eachother, the guy does not need to do all the work The fact remains.. women are the superior sexual machine. I never could figure out why somebody would take on more than he could handle.. but then.. that's a whole 'nother thread. Sorry to disagree, LotusSong... but as far as anatomy itself is concerned, women are not a sexual machine at all. Being (as per the physical necessities of the act of sex itself) passive, the man is the only "sexual machine" involved in male/female copulation while the woman merely provides a particular combination of lubrication, friction and pressure. In essence, a receptor with a lovely set of accessories. I'm sure that you would like to say that there is more to sex than the specific act of copulation, but that is what would blow your argument out of the water; as it is entirely possible for a man to ejaculate several times in a session and in between those times of copulation he can continually stimulate the woman both digitally and/or orally so that she may keep having her own repeated orgasmic satisfaction whilst his penis is simultaneously being primed for another engagement. Physiologically, men are the workhorse in the arrangement whilst the woman selfishly is built to experience a far superior amount of orgasms of a variety incomprehensible to the man. All of the above doesn't even begin to touch on the emotional and social benefits of polyamorous relationships, unless you are of the opinion that sex is the only reason for a relationship or you for some reason believe that the only form of poly is for everybody involved to have sex together every time. In fact, in many poly relationships, threesomes and moresomes never even come into play in the bedroom. note: Playing the Devil's advocate here, i would far prefer to have sex with a woman than a man; i believe that women are sexually superior... My real complaint was in your term "sexual machine" and the statement that poly is not a valid option. We shall now return to your regularly scheduled funniness, sorry to segue into the serious.
< Message edited by darchChylde -- 7/5/2009 10:33:00 PM >
_____________________________
I'm the man your mother warned you about... if only to keep me to herself. I'm a male dominant switch whose experienced as a poly sub to a dominant woman . Where the fuck do I post? Proud Owner and Protector of chyldeschylde.
|