RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 9:34:20 AM)

Greetings Arpig,
                       Sometimes the topic is not important, but the exchange. It is interesting to express your own opinion while learning what others think about things. One of the best ways of doing this is with debate. It is also a way of opening yourself to the ideas of others and coming to understand different opinions, therefore expanding your acceptance and tolerance of what is different.

estah




Arpig -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 9:38:50 AM)

Fair enough estah. I have made my opinion of this asinine idea clear enough already, and I really don't give a rat's ass where the idea comes from, nor who should get credit for it, so I will wish you all a happy debate.

No throwing sand!!




estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 9:41:43 AM)

Sand throwing is too easy, and why throw sand when you can ahhh....I think I will keep that idea to myself. *winks*

estah




awmslave -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 10:54:48 AM)

I think she made a mistake: she wanted to say 6 billion. Why make big deal out of it?  Although, news media making fool out of her makes lot of sense as she is a Republican.




Arpig -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:00:03 AM)

quote:

I think she made a mistake: she wanted to say 6 billion.


I doubt it was a mistake for the following reasons:

1) She said it twice.
2) 6000 is the number most often put forth for the age of the earth by Young Earth Creationists
3) The world is much older than 6 billion years, it makes no sense for her to have grabbed the number 6 billion out of the air for her speech. Nobody, scientist or creationist, claims the world is 6 billion years old.




DomKen -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:01:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: estah

Greetings DomKen,

                              The idea of YEC gots its name later but the original concept is older the Ussher and after it saw a deline in the 18th century the revival that it has experienced since the start of the 20th century is thanks to the rise in Fundamentalist Christianity...which mainly takes evidence from the works of Seventh Day Adventists such as White, Price and Morris.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Earth_creationism
http://www.conservapedia.com/Young_earth_creationism
http://www.nwcreation.net/ageyoung.html
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Young_earth_creationism
On this a a large majority of YEC sites do not accredit any person with their belief but base it on evidence found in the bible. There is a few references to Ussher (as well as a number of other people) but he is never directly or even indirectly accredited with the concept (which existed even in the time of Bebe, who was born in 672/673 and died in 735). Considering that the idea of YEC existed before the time of Ussher it is hard to give a man credit for something the was around before his birth. Although I do admit that the timeline of Ussher was in the KJV of the bible, you also need to note this a bible used only by the Anglican church, and a large majority of Anglicans do not believe in YEC . The timeline is used in the version of the bible due to the fact that Ussher was in high standing with King James. You also need to note it was only included in the annotated editions of the KJV.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology


I never claimed the idea that YEC comes from only Ussher's chronology. Please don't erect strawmen.

The Ussher chronology is by far the most frequently used chronology used by YEC's to determine the age of the Earth. Which is all I've ever said.




DomKen -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:04:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

I think she made a mistake: she wanted to say 6 billion.


I doubt it was a mistake for the following reasons:

1) She said it twice.
2) 6000 is the number most often put forth for the age of the earth by Young Earth Creationists
3) The world is much older than 6 billion years, it makes no sense for her to have grabbed the number 6 billion out of the air for her speech. Nobody, scientist or creationist, claims the world is 6 billion years old.


The Earth isn't older than 6 billion years. It's actually about 4.5 billion. The universe is much older at roughly 14 billion.




Lucylastic -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:06:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

I think she made a mistake: she wanted to say 6 billion.


I doubt it was a mistake for the following reasons:

1) She said it twice.
2) 6000 is the number most often put forth for the age of the earth by Young Earth Creationists
3) The world is much older than 6 billion years, it makes no sense for her to have grabbed the number 6 billion out of the air for her speech. Nobody, scientist or creationist, claims the world is 6 billion years old.


Well they have 2 syllabubs each...so easy to get them mixed up:)
Lucy
trying to be helpful




estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:15:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: estah

The 6000 years as the age of the earth comes from the Jewish belief, atleast from their timeline from the making of the Earth until today. It is not something calculated by a bishop or even started by the christian. Have a look at the Hebrew calender and you would be able to find this out. The age said by the Jews was calculated even before the Christian belief existed. I do acknowledge that you changed your opinion later, but you did claim that the idea of the Earth being 6000 years old was based on the Ussher timeline.

estah

No. It really is based on the work of Ussher.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology




This states otherwise, but if you took the time to read a number of the major and even minor fundamentalist christian websites, or even a deeper study into the YEC movement you will find very few references to Ussher.

estah




Arpig -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:19:25 AM)

quote:

The Earth isn't older than 6 billion years. It's actually about 4.5 billion. The universe is much older at roughly 14 billion.

I stand corrected. Thanks DK.




DomKen -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:28:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: estah

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: estah

The 6000 years as the age of the earth comes from the Jewish belief, atleast from their timeline from the making of the Earth until today. It is not something calculated by a bishop or even started by the christian. Have a look at the Hebrew calender and you would be able to find this out. The age said by the Jews was calculated even before the Christian belief existed. I do acknowledge that you changed your opinion later, but you did claim that the idea of the Earth being 6000 years old was based on the Ussher timeline.

estah

No. It really is based on the work of Ussher.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology




This states otherwise, but if you took the time to read a number of the major and even minor fundamentalist christian websites, or even a deeper study into the YEC movement you will find very few references to Ussher.

estah

Please don't make assumptions about things you don't know anything about.

I have already posted multiple links to prominent YEC groups, AiG and CSE, using Ussher as their basis. I can easily post more.

I've been actively opposing these people for more than 20 years and while few use Ussher's name frequently the claims for a 6000 year old Earth, specifically a begining in 4004 B.C., are the norm.

If you really want to argue this I recommend sending a letter to Hovind, Ham or Gish. Although Hovind might be your best bet since he's the onlyone actually where they all belong.




awmslave -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:29:33 AM)

quote:

The world is much older than 6 billion years,


She was talking about the Earth. The age of the Earth is considered by scientists today ~4.5 billion. 




estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:32:15 AM)

DomKen I am going what I have read on a number of websites for the various groups and my personal interaction with various members of these and other groups. Some of who I do call friend.

Just because people believe something different to us does not make them wrong and us right, the only being who has the right to judge such a thing is HaShem (God, Allah or however you wish to call the divine being).




estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:38:22 AM)

DomKen are you referring to the American group called YCE?

estah




Arpig -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:40:03 AM)

quote:

Just because people believe something different to us does not make them wrong and us right

Sorry estah, but I must disagree. Some things simply are wrong, no matter how fervently one may believe them. The Flat Earth for example. I know this to be incorrect because I have personally circumnavigated the globe. It doesn't matter how deeply the flat earthers believe in a flat earth, it is demonstrably a globe. the same goes for the young earth creationists' claim of the world being only 6000 or so years old. It is demonstrably wrong, on the basis of the various methods of radioactive decay dating.

To awmslave

Yes I was wrong, I had the 14 billion age in my head. However I don't think that changes any of my points, I think she said exactly what she meant to say.




estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:43:58 AM)

Arpig normally I would agree but when it comes to faith, I do not think it is for anyone to tell another they are wrong or to judge them, regardless of how crazy their ideas seem to us.

estah




slavekal -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:45:37 AM)

It is correct to tell someone they are wrong when they are wrong.  If your faith tells you that triangles have five sides, then your faith is wrong. 




estah -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 11:47:46 AM)

If you are brought up believing that 3 is 5 then a triangle having 5 sides is not incorrect. *Winks*

Ok ok I could not resist that one.

estah




DomKen -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 12:04:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: estah

DomKen are you referring to the American group called YCE?

estah


Never heard of YCE. CSE is Creation Science Evangelism. Kent Hovinds group.

quote:

DomKen I am going what I have read on a number of websites for the various groups and my personal interaction with various members of these and other groups. Some of who I do call friend.

Just because people believe something different to us does not make them wrong and us right, the only being who has the right to judge such a thing is HaShem (God, Allah or however you wish to call the divine being).

I couldn't care less what your friends say. I've been dealing with these people for a very long time. I've already shown AiG and CSE push Ussher.

And they are wrong. Evolution occurs, the earth is 4.5 billion years old, the universe is about 14 billion years old. A world wide flood never happened.




Arpig -> RE: Proof The World Is 6,000 Years Old - End Game (7/14/2009 12:05:41 PM)

Well estah, I basically agree with what slavekal said, wrong is wrong. I do not begrudge anyone the right to believe whatever nonesense they want to when it comes to their religion, but I am under no obligation to agree with them, nor to accept their beliefs when they are obviously wrong. This is especially true when they are trying to have these erroneous beliefs taught in schools.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875