gift4mistress
Posts: 165
Joined: 6/30/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Begs the question, and adds a perfectionist fallacy. All of these things need attention, of course. Personally--I argued we couldn't afford Iraq and Afghanistan, but we're stuck now. But even with economic woes at home, it's not realistic to pretend the rest of the world doesn't affect matters within our borders--especially economically. I agree that Iraq was a very stupid move on behalf of George Bush. And yes, to some extent we are stuck in those two countries. Which is exactly my point. We don't have the resources or money to distribute 850 billion of our own money to get rid of poverty. Thus, you are arguing the same point I am, no? Iraq, Afghanistan, health care reform, economic recession, war on drugs, war on terrorism, and the list goes on. We are spending large sums of money that we don't have in order to instill what? Getting rid of poverty throughout the world? I also would like to point out that Terrorism is in my opinion, a small problem compared to all the other problems we are having.
< Message edited by gift4mistress -- 8/9/2009 9:53:06 AM >
|