Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: 102 minutes that changed America


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 102 minutes that changed America Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 102 minutes that changed America - 9/10/2009 1:03:39 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I believe that extraordinary rendition is another topic, what I was referring to was the enhanced interrogation techniques employed by the CIA at Club GTMO. Even counting Arpig's highly questionable contribution though, together with the people sent off through extraordinary rendition by Bill Clinton and G.W. my point stands rather well I think, which is essentially that we're not torturing everyone who we find wearing a turban. There were basically a few very high value people at the top who were questioned that way.

Obama's doing an extensive internal audit and he's not finding what you and Arpig seem to be claiming at all, is he. And he has every resource available to him to find the truth.



Im not sure how you can claim you only meant Gitmo, torture is torture no matter where it is carried out. The previous administration new that when authorising renditions.

Im also unsure how you know what President Obama has or hasnt been told. I havent seen anything in the public domain about this, at least not in the news.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: 102 minutes that changed America - 9/10/2009 4:49:43 AM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
Please ignore my previous post (#80) it was posted to the wrong thread, and I didn't catch it in time to delete it....Hey Mod 11, if you see this could you please delete post#80...thanks.

_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: 102 minutes that changed America - 9/10/2009 8:26:55 AM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Arpig, you switched terms from post 75 to 79 It went from "absolute nobodies" being interogated to "relative nobodies".

It's hard to have a serious talk with someone who switches terms in mid debate, and pretends he hasn't.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: 102 minutes that changed America - 9/10/2009 10:36:41 AM   
Arpig


Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
quote:

Arpig, you switched terms from post 75 to 79 It went from "absolute nobodies" being interogated to "relative nobodies".

It's hard to have a serious talk with someone who switches terms in mid debate, and pretends he hasn't.
You are right, I did switch terms,nothing deliberate, I was just making my point and didn't go back to see just which terms I had used...I didn't think anybody would care, seeing as it didn't detract from the point I was making, but I guess that was wrong, some of you do care. I never claimed or pretended to have not switched terms, I wasn't even aware I had...I wasn't quoting myself I was reiterating my point and used slightly different wording to say essentially the same thing. And just to be clear, so there's no worry about what terms are being used...I stand by first term: "absolute nobodies" happy now?

Now if you could address the substance of my post rather than the wording, we could move this discussion along

_____________________________

Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!


Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?

CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: 102 minutes that changed America - 9/10/2009 1:08:11 PM   
TurboJugend


Posts: 481
Joined: 6/15/2009
Status: offline
I am watching the movie now ( recorded from History Channel HD). It is 2 hours in total.
Gives a bit of a different view then I saw before.....but to be honest ..content wise as a viewer ( at minute 28)......it is almost all the same...

For history/documentation....it is very important....

< Message edited by TurboJugend -- 9/10/2009 1:10:13 PM >


_____________________________

Justme696 on the otherside
- D stands for Damian....not dude

(in reply to Arpig)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: 102 minutes that changed America - 9/10/2009 3:26:49 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

What I find most striking about the film if I'm being honest is the total inability to fight fire, despite their best efforts, in a high-rise building or to evacuate people. I'm not sure if the WTC towers had a sprinkler system but I expect it would have all most certainly been water based which would have only spread the fuel around further. No one expected a fire load of jet fuel but future systems should use foam like is used when a plane crash lands at an airport. If those fires had been brought under control sooner those towers almost certainly wouldn't have collapsed at all and this is where most people probably died, not from the initial impacts.

Neither system would've helped in this case, since the distribution systems for the sprinklers (and would've been the same for foam) were broken by the impact.

quote:

SL4V3M4YB3

You know you see those heavy lifting helicopters lifting tanks, they should have some on standby containing foam tanks that could be flown adjacent to a high-rise building then a high pressure jet of foam could be directed into the fire from the outside. The outside perimeter is where the fire is being fuelled by the most oxygen. You could even spray some kind of viscous coating on the outside to remove the external source of oxygen.



The coating can not span a structural opening; while the foam may help when the fire's close to the exterior, it would be of little use when it's in the overhead or central structure.

quote:

SL4V3M4YB3
In any case these buildings were designed long ago and I expect modern design philosophy would cope better under such a situation.

They were designed for a 737, IIRC.  No one can read the future.

quote:

SL4V3M4YB3
edited to add: I suppose the towers could have collapsed eventually due to the wind forces alone but I'm a strong believer in equilibrium of forces meaning if a structure is proven to stand up for a period of time as it is and the external forces applied to it remain more or less the same it will stand much longer. The only significant thing affected the structure in my view was the heat from the fire and if the fire had been at the very top of the buildings rather than a few floors down that obviously also would have helped the situation.

If the fire heats the trusses to the point of sagging, and the floor fails, then wind has nothing to do with the failure.

NIST has an 8-part investigation of the cause of collapse of WTC 1 and 2, and also has an analysis of the collapse of WTC 7.  You can find the start of the reports here.

thornhappy

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 86
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 102 minutes that changed America Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063