WolvenFury
Posts: 28
Joined: 2/19/2008 Status: offline
|
Your link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12131664 (Original Source from which the summation of the study was retrieved) As to the relevance of the material in question, I point to the original question which was inferring a possible connection to breast cancer from physical trauma. My statement pointed out a correlative plausibility applicable to this specific question, if you care to reread it, in relation to "physical trauma". Specificity was not implied as to the specific method of delivery, merely the question of whether or not "physical trauma" correlated to breast cancer. I answered that question. The source itself was published in Lancet, May 1994 edition. In relation to your comment pertaining to hypochrondriasis, there was no relevant basis in utilizing the term other than to insult and degrade, as the term by definition (Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypochondriasis) states, correctly, that it is a psychiatric construct used to describe "...an excessive preoccupation with one's health, usually focusing on some particular symptom, as cardiac or gastric problems" or " excessive worry or talk about one's health", which does not match to your usage of the term and only to the context of the overall subject matter in an abstract, dismissive manner. In my opinion, I believe you are simply attempting to "cover your ass", to interject a cultural colloqiualism into this sideshow "debate". As to my professor, I am quite sure he or any other sufficiently qualified academic would agree with my use of the study to reinforce my stated fact that it is indeed a statistical probability that physical trauma can be linked to breast cancer and that due to the vague, non-specific nature of the question I was indeed correct in answering the question exactly as worded. In reference to the personal attack, which I copy below... "Whether you "tested out" and are in Med School or not doesn't change the pragmatic facts. I'll concede, as you represent, you "could have occurred to allow me this achievement". I maintain my doubt that they did. It is of no consequence, or relevance, one way or the other." ...I will respond by saying first that, to clarify since I believe you may have misunderstood my original statement, I did not "test out" of school, merely past certain grades and out of certain courses which has compounded with my marks and a combination of AP credit for college courses and actual college courses taken in the latter two years of my high school career under dual enrollment, and that second that whatever doubts you may have about it, that the achievement is indeed a valid mention as you called my credibility into question and the level of education I have received is directly supportive of said credibility.
_____________________________
Leo, RPT/CPT and Medical Student
|