RE: Feminism (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


Elisabella -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 7:16:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Elisabella, first of all, you can keep your degrading "honey" snipes to yourself. I've not stooped to childish name calling like others I am simply making a point that you do not agree with.


I call my friends honey. And my mom. Usually in the sense of "oh my god did they just say that?" and then I proceed to point out why what they said is ridiculous. It's chiding, not degrading.

I suppose another way to say it would be "are you fucking serious? Do you really believe this?" but to me that would be degrading.

quote:

Secondly, I read your reply to me as somewhat of a "I want to take what I like about feminism and use it, but the part that makes it harder for me personally, I want to disregard."


Well that's what I've been saying all along. The legal bits that say men and women have the same opportunities I'll keep, the social bits that say men and women should act the same I'll get rid of.

I see it as like, ok men and women have the same opportunities. How many women plumbers are there? Not a lot right? But there are some. So the legal bits are like, for the few women who do want to be plumbers, they're legally able. But for most women who don't, there shouldn't be a social expectation that says that the genders should be represented equally.

quote:

Well too bad. You cannot have the right to things like maternity leave and give the father the same rights. Fair is fair. And descrimination is descrimination. Whether you like it or not.


Maternity leave is for the body to recuperate after childbirth or a c-section, as well as to allow the mother to breast-feed the newborn. I really don't see why fathers would need to do either.

quote:

Yes, social expectations are evolving but neither you nor I can determine exactly how. It is unfortunate I know, I would like to be the QueenBitchoftheUniverse but I am quite aware that it's not likely to happen.


Well yeah, but not ruling the universe doesn't mean you can't be an activist.

quote:

Just because a man is physcially larger in size does NOT make him a superiour human. In fact, within the laws of our society, the very biological facts that make them bigger and stronger, may indeed at times make them inferiour human beings. The prisons are full of men that were overly endowed with testosterone.


That's exactly what I've been saying all along. Like, to the tee.

quote:

Forgive me if I cry foul on your expectation of women and babies. I am not sure what society you live in and what the expectations there are, but the society I live in find it completely acceptable for a woman to stay home and raise her children. It is very possible for her to return to work in whatever capacity she chooses, at any point. Of course there are financial sacrifices, so far no one is paying people to stay home and parent......unless you count the government welfare system.


Maybe it's just where I was raised then - there was a general expectation of staying home for a year or three and then going back to work. And that's only if children are involved, the society I grew up in (middle class) thought "housewife" was a dirty word.

quote:

I personally do not see a "standard" especially the standard you seem so violently against. Perhaps where you live there are huge differences in the way women must fit into tidy little boxes.


Probably.

quote:

The day changing a tire or assembling a bookcase is so difficult I need a person of another gender to do it........I will be too old and decrepit to wipe my own ass. Either gender will be able to do it for me and I probably shouldn't be driving anyway.


Its not about whether it's too difficult to do, it's the gesture. And I know this is going to sound so cliche but there is a serious risk of breaking a nail.

It's fine if you want to do it yourself, I just don't see why there should be the expectation that you can. Kinda like with men and laundry. It's not terribly hard to put laundry in and wash it and dry it and hang it up or fold it. But it's not a guy thing to do.

quote:

However, where I live, being a woman means having choices. In fact, I see women as having more choices than men.


True. I'd say not all of them are good choices though - the number of unwed mothers in high school - but that's a whole new topic.

quote:

So yes Elisabella, you really can dramatize the downfall of family and society as we know it and blame feminism but, based upon the examples I see DAILY, I will say bullshit.


I don't just blame feminism, I blame a large bit of it on the sexual revolution of the 60s and the feminization of men in the 90's...as well as untempered capitalism and technological progress without introspection and social growth...but yeah the "women can do every single thing in the world as well as a man can and that's why we have to lower the requirements for firefighters so women can pass the test and prove they're just as good" sort of thinking is part of the error.

I mean, look at what you've been posting. You posted a paragraph that pretty much summed up exactly what I've been saying, and yet you still think that pointing out superiority or inferiority in certain areas is linked to being "a better human" which is ridiculous to me. That, specifically, is an effect of recent feminist thought that thinks "equal" is a synonym for "identical" when speaking about humans.

quote:


And I will not sink to childish name calling and sniping to do so. THAT would make me look like an inferiour human being and I strive for otherwise.


Fair enough, if you'd like me to be more blunt with my incredulity I will do so. To be honest I feel that expressing it the way I did is more polite than directly calling someone out.




eihwaz -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 7:50:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama
Because that is what they are supposed to be, socially speaking, and it is the meaning of the iconography of the football field.  Cheerleaders are a very special and sacralized kind of symbolic slut, the sort of slut that rewards valor and victory.  Thematically and iconographically ...

Sort of like a concomitant to football as symbolic ground warfare.  That makes sense.

BTW (and perhaps not quite to the immediate point, but still relevant) Jean Kilbourne has done some great work on the image of women in advertising.




Lucienne -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 8:14:42 PM)

Shakti, re: Andalusite, I think you're reaching to create enemies.




Lucienne -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 8:18:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Maternity leave is for the body to recuperate after childbirth or a c-section, as well as to allow the mother to breast-feed the newborn. I really don't see why fathers would need to do either.


Weren't you the person earlier in the thread displeased that it's difficult to find women passionate about mothering? Do you think that mothering is more important than fathering?  Do you not see why a new parent would want to spend as much time as possible with their newborn?




Elisabella -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 8:40:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Maternity leave is for the body to recuperate after childbirth or a c-section, as well as to allow the mother to breast-feed the newborn. I really don't see why fathers would need to do either.


Weren't you the person earlier in the thread displeased that it's difficult to find women passionate about mothering? Do you think that mothering is more important than fathering?  Do you not see why a new parent would want to spend as much time as possible with their newborn?



I'd imagine that for a newborn, the mother-child bond is more important, mainly due to the breast-feeding link that more or less embodies the nurturing spirit.. But I can't say if it's a fact.




Lucienne -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 8:46:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Maternity leave is for the body to recuperate after childbirth or a c-section, as well as to allow the mother to breast-feed the newborn. I really don't see why fathers would need to do either.


Weren't you the person earlier in the thread displeased that it's difficult to find women passionate about mothering? Do you think that mothering is more important than fathering?  Do you not see why a new parent would want to spend as much time as possible with their newborn?



I'd imagine that for a newborn, the mother-child bond is more important, mainly due to the breast-feeding link that more or less embodies the nurturing spirit.. But I can't say if it's a fact.


I wasn't talking about it from the newborn's perspective. Is there some reason you are devaluing the desire of new fathers to spend more time with their children via family leave?




Elisabella -> RE: Feminism (10/23/2009 9:06:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Maternity leave is for the body to recuperate after childbirth or a c-section, as well as to allow the mother to breast-feed the newborn. I really don't see why fathers would need to do either.


Weren't you the person earlier in the thread displeased that it's difficult to find women passionate about mothering? Do you think that mothering is more important than fathering?  Do you not see why a new parent would want to spend as much time as possible with their newborn?



I'd imagine that for a newborn, the mother-child bond is more important, mainly due to the breast-feeding link that more or less embodies the nurturing spirit.. But I can't say if it's a fact.


I wasn't talking about it from the newborn's perspective. Is there some reason you are devaluing the desire of new fathers to spend more time with their children via family leave?



Well aside from the fact that the mother's body literally has to recuperate from pregnancy, which makes it a form of medical leave, and the fact that her body is producing milk for the baby, I think that the mother is the primary caretaker of the child. At least in most relationships.

In some countries (Australia, Canada, USA) there are the same minimums for maternity and paternity leave, which I guess is fair, but I still don't see an actual need for paternity leave. It would be nice, sure, but for women it's pretty much a necessity due to how pregnancy affects our bodies.




LaTigresse -> RE: Feminism (10/24/2009 6:35:06 AM)

Using fast reply.....

Here is a link to an interesting article I just read.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/opinion/24lipman.html?pagewanted=1&th&adxnnl=1&emc=th&adxnnlx=1256389283-Szm%20AGceQwJQk5/nuR3W3Q




Lucienne -> RE: Feminism (10/24/2009 6:59:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

In some countries (Australia, Canada, USA) there are the same minimums for maternity and paternity leave, which I guess is fair, but I still don't see an actual need for paternity leave. It would be nice, sure, but for women it's pretty much a necessity due to how pregnancy affects our bodies.


A society that truly values child-rearing would recognize that it is something both men and women are interested in. Paternity leave isn't just something that "is nice," it is something that allows fathers to spend time performing the valuable tasks of child-rearing.

And maternity leave is rarely a physical necessity for the woman. A few sick days, sure. But weeks? No. This is evidenced by how frequently financial necessity will have a woman back in the work force long before she would like. Maternity leave is something we've created as a (frequently grudging) recognition of the value of child-rearing. Extending parental leave to fathers is further recognition of that value.

You talk about respecting traditional areas of women's labor, but it seems to be only a token respect with words, not backed up by any action.




ShaktiSama -> RE: Feminism (10/24/2009 5:41:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

Shakti, re: Andalusite, I think you're reaching to create enemies.


I don't regard Andalusite as an enemy.  Just don't see any point in beating my head against certain walls.




Elisabella -> RE: Feminism (10/24/2009 6:47:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

In some countries (Australia, Canada, USA) there are the same minimums for maternity and paternity leave, which I guess is fair, but I still don't see an actual need for paternity leave. It would be nice, sure, but for women it's pretty much a necessity due to how pregnancy affects our bodies.


A society that truly values child-rearing would recognize that it is something both men and women are interested in. Paternity leave isn't just something that "is nice," it is something that allows fathers to spend time performing the valuable tasks of child-rearing.

And maternity leave is rarely a physical necessity for the woman. A few sick days, sure. But weeks? No. This is evidenced by how frequently financial necessity will have a woman back in the work force long before she would like. Maternity leave is something we've created as a (frequently grudging) recognition of the value of child-rearing. Extending parental leave to fathers is further recognition of that value.

You talk about respecting traditional areas of women's labor, but it seems to be only a token respect with words, not backed up by any action.



Weeks of parental leave are often unpaid. Usually it's 5-10 days of paid maternity leave, then the option to take an unpaid vacation.

I said before that having equal access to parental leave is fair, and I really have nothing against it. But I'd freak out if I had a baby and the father thought it was more important to stay home and change diapers than to go to work and make sure we have, you know, food for the baby.

I'm not just talking about respecting traditional areas of women's labour, but talking about respecting the balance of the division of labour. Two parents staying home with the kid is just as ridiculous as two parents out working full time. I suppose a family could have the father take parental leave while the mother goes out to work, because we as a society are no longer so completely dependent on nature that we have to follow the patterns she set for us, but I have no qualms with saying I, personally, have no respect for men who take the female role in a heterosexual relationship, or women who take the masculine role.

That last paragraph is just a matter of personal belief, so please no posts saying how I want to "force" the world to be a certain way. Laughing at someone is not the same as legally prohibiting their way of life.




Lucienne -> RE: Feminism (10/24/2009 7:22:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Weeks of parental leave are often unpaid. Usually it's 5-10 days of paid maternity leave, then the option to take an unpaid vacation.

I said before that having equal access to parental leave is fair, and I really have nothing against it. But I'd freak out if I had a baby and the father thought it was more important to stay home and change diapers than to go to work and make sure we have, you know, food for the baby.

I'm not just talking about respecting traditional areas of women's labour, but talking about respecting the balance of the division of labour. Two parents staying home with the kid is just as ridiculous as two parents out working full time. I suppose a family could have the father take parental leave while the mother goes out to work, because we as a society are no longer so completely dependent on nature that we have to follow the patterns she set for us, but I have no qualms with saying I, personally, have no respect for men who take the female role in a heterosexual relationship, or women who take the masculine role.

That last paragraph is just a matter of personal belief, so please no posts saying how I want to "force" the world to be a certain way. Laughing at someone is not the same as legally prohibiting their way of life.


"Force" is your issue, not mine. And I'm OK with you having "no respect" for men who dare to care about nurturing their children, or, as you style it men who "take the female role in a heterosexual relationship." Personally, I don't think that the desire to nurture your children is gender based. And I will do everything I can to get the surrounding culture to agree with me. And... I will win. So, enjoy your laughs while you can.




MistressMinna -> RE: Feminism (10/24/2009 7:22:27 PM)

I tuned out on the whole feminist issue years ago when I was politically active, debating through the League of Women Voters and was called a "traitor to my gender" for my opposing a piece of legislation they endorsed. (My opposition was based on sound reasoning. It was a poorly crafted bill, had no financial controls, left all the money controlled by appointees with no oversight, etc.) I simply tired of being told what to think based on my gender. I believe we are all quite capable of thinking on our own, thank you.

Now football is a whole other issue. The vocal "feminist" minority should adore it...
what's not to like about buff men in tight pants pummeling each other for your entertainment?

I generally hate sports but on the rare occasion I stop and watch something, it is almost always extreme fighting...especially since half the fighters are now wearing those tight knee length pants instead of boxers...
once again... what's not to like about two buff dudes wrestling and smacking each other about for your entertainment?

I have noticed there seem to be no female referees. I wonder if I can get in under an affirmation action quota.

- MM




Elisabella -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 4:06:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Weeks of parental leave are often unpaid. Usually it's 5-10 days of paid maternity leave, then the option to take an unpaid vacation.

I said before that having equal access to parental leave is fair, and I really have nothing against it. But I'd freak out if I had a baby and the father thought it was more important to stay home and change diapers than to go to work and make sure we have, you know, food for the baby.

I'm not just talking about respecting traditional areas of women's labour, but talking about respecting the balance of the division of labour. Two parents staying home with the kid is just as ridiculous as two parents out working full time. I suppose a family could have the father take parental leave while the mother goes out to work, because we as a society are no longer so completely dependent on nature that we have to follow the patterns she set for us, but I have no qualms with saying I, personally, have no respect for men who take the female role in a heterosexual relationship, or women who take the masculine role.

That last paragraph is just a matter of personal belief, so please no posts saying how I want to "force" the world to be a certain way. Laughing at someone is not the same as legally prohibiting their way of life.


"Force" is your issue, not mine. And I'm OK with you having "no respect" for men who dare to care about nurturing their children, or, as you style it men who "take the female role in a heterosexual relationship." Personally, I don't think that the desire to nurture your children is gender based. And I will do everything I can to get the surrounding culture to agree with me. And... I will win. So, enjoy your laughs while you can.



Everything you can?

I run an anti-feminist website and even I know I'm not *that* committed.

What is it you're doing by way of activism?




Louve00 -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 4:39:13 AM)

Pardon me for pushing my nose into this conversation.  I haven't read every post on this thread, but have read this last page, where the debate pursues about maternity and paternity leave.  While I do believe a maternity leave is to give the woman's body a chance to heal, it is also a time of bonding with her new babe.  I think that was the whole purpose behind a man taking a paternity leave.  Was to help a new mother adjust to her baby, to bond with his baby, along with his wife/partner, to be a part of the family unit as it forms.  There may not be any physical reason for him to take a leave.  I think it is most as the supporter, provider, and pillar, he is expected to be for his new family.  If he's afforded that by virtue of his job, why shouldn't he be involved with the initial establishment of the "new family".




Elisabella -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 4:52:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

Pardon me for pushing my nose into this conversation.  I haven't read every post on this thread, but have read this last page, where the debate pursues about maternity and paternity leave.  While I do believe a maternity leave is to give the woman's body a chance to heal, it is also a time of bonding with her new babe.  I think that was the whole purpose behind a man taking a paternity leave.  Was to help a new mother adjust to her baby, to bond with his baby, along with his wife/partner, to be a part of the family unit as it forms.  There may not be any physical reason for him to take a leave.  I think it is most as the supporter, provider, and pillar, he is expected to be for his new family.  If he's afforded that by virtue of his job, why shouldn't he be involved with the initial establishment of the "new family".


Oh definitely he should take a couple days of paid leave.

In the US there is no paid parental leave, just a federally mandated guarantee of 12 weeks (for either parent) of unpaid leave without worrying about losing your job.

To me at least, if a man wants to be a father, he should be the provider. But like I've said for the whole thread I think gender roles are there for a reason.

Obviously later (even 6 months later) there will be a strong need for a father as a male role model but at the newborn stage its pretty much just a warmth food and attention thing which I feel the mother can provide adequately.

Personally I think fathers who take a fair bit of unpaid paternity leave are just as selfish as mothers who return to work right away when there's no pressing financial need to.




LaTigresse -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 6:09:06 AM)

Yes there is paid paternal leave. It simply depends upon the company the man works for.

I have utmost respect for a man that wishes to take a week off to be home with his new child and the mother of his child. To help her with the baby and any additional children they may have. To get up in the middle of the night when she needs to sleep.

My son did not get paid paternity leave, he took vacation days. He is one of the best fathers I know. He changed diapers, fed, and took care of sick babies. He supported the mother of his children. Allowing her time to persue her dream of becoming a nurse.

Not much different than many other men I know. Men that have fabulous relationships with their children and yet, are men. Not one of them is a house husband. Just part of a working partnership.

One thing you learn as you get older (hopefully) the world is not made up of black and white when it comes to people and relationships. If you base your opinions and expectations of people upon some fairy tale expectations, you will be sorely disappointed.




nanshakh -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 7:02:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
...the newborn stage its pretty much just a warmth food and attention thing which I feel the mother can provide adequately

Personally I think fathers who take a fair bit of unpaid paternity leave are just as selfish as mothers who return to work right away when there's no pressing financial need to.


Obviously you've never had children and have no idea what you are talking about.

"Personally I think..." [8|] - Whatever you are, male of female, why don't you experience the whole thing and stop being so imbued with your principles?





OrionTheWolf -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 3:56:04 PM)

Thousands of years of nature seems to have honed certain skills in each gender. Now with the modern age, it seems that they do not have to be as defined. As a man who raised two kids for 10 years of their pre-adult lives as a single parents, being a member of a couple of single Dad email lists, and reading several books on it, I must say that there is in fact certain emotional, and nurturing aspects that do not come so easily to most males.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Personally, I don't think that the desire to nurture your children is gender based.




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Feminism (10/25/2009 4:17:30 PM)

quote:

at the newborn stage its pretty much just a warmth food and attention thing which I feel the mother can provide adequately.


....and pretty much zero sleep. At least with the father home, mom has a chance to get some sleep while he cares for the baby.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875