CalifChick -> RE: "Schrodinger’s Rapist" and meeting people online (1/18/2010 10:36:39 AM)
|
I thought I had mentioned this back when this thread was new, but I guess I didn't. About 20 years ago, six of us (3 couples) got together for dinner and board games. This particular night we played the game "Scruples, The Game of Moral Dilemmas". Basically you are given a scenario and decide how you would react. Your choices are "yes", "no", and "depends". The other players decide if you're telling the truth or bluffing. The biggest "discussion" was on one question (and it was heated enough that I remember it after 20 years), and the question was (paraphrased), "You see someone walking down the street with a duffel bag, headed towards a strip mall with a laundromat. You just came from there and know they are closed. Do you stop and tell them?" All the men said "yes" and all the women said "it depends". The men were flabbergasted at our reasoning. 1, we don't know they have laundry in the bag. 2, it doesn't say if we're on foot or in a car. 3, it doesn't say if it's a man, a woman, someone who looks unsavory. and so on... there wasn't enough information for the women to give a definitive answer. That's when we told the men that we are always on guard... sometimes on high alert, sometimes on low alert, but always assessing situations for our own safety. And that's when the heated discussion took place. Because they didn't do it (and this was small-town Louisiana), they couldn't believe that WE did it. Cali
|
|
|
|