Lucienne
Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GYPSYMAMBO THIS comes from a question posed in another thread.. that with the last 5000 years of patriarchal chaos and diabolization of relationship..body..spirit....and general fukkedupness... HOW COULD THEY BE? HOW DID THEY DEVELOP/? IF THEY ARE IF your "man"/mate/sub is submissive...was he when you met? and how did you enhance this? GM If you want to talk about cultural norms, it's foolish to ignore the longstanding belief that men are essentially beasts and one of the roles of marriage as an institution is to get men to "submit" to the civilizing influence of their wives. In modern times, see "Honey Do" lists. On a more individual level, yes, of course men can be submissive. Personally, I tend to make them, if not more submissive, more comfortable with their submissive sides, through sheer force of personality. It's not something I've tried to do. It actually drove me crazy for years. But for me, part of maturing as a human being has involved accepting the fact that suppressing my dominant side is unhealthy and it never fooled most people anyway. As a switch, I know that for me submission doesn't involve weakness as much as trust. And I see no reason to believe that men are incapable of having equal urges to feel that sense of trust and safety in their partner. If anything, cultural training makes them even more eager to feel that sense of reliance when they're constantly pushed to be so strong and independent.
|