Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 11:54:40 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

People enjoy them, ergo they should be there.

The only ones who seem to be complaining is the man, on behalf of a handful of religious extremists (which would include the Earth First! types).

I never thought I'd see the day that Liberals were arguing vehemently against Bohemian nature lovers on the behalf of some religious fundamentalists.

Its such a strange world sometimes...


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda
This is mind-boggling, even for you. You acknowledge that they are not supposed to be there, but can not comprehend why something that  is not supposed to be there has to be removed?

Do you even read what you write?



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 11:56:19 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
1. Why are the religious concerns even relevant?  ~~ isnt even relevant

and

2. Why destroy them now? What reason could there possibly be. ~~ no permits... no inspections... the Forestry service has a duty to ensure public safety.


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:00:21 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
in that article, here is more what happened:

indians said, thats religious ground, we want it gone (cause they seen it and complained) and hey they are people too, they just got a reason you don't like.

USFS: becoming aware of it.... hey, he didn't get a permit to do this, (as is required by law) hold a hearing (as is required by law) and get an environmental impact statement (as is required by law), therefore it has to come down (as is required by law), but some folks like it, and it ain't a bad idea, so if he gets the permit and does the rest (as required by law) we could see it being built.

that is about all there is, there is no larger issue here. It is not just a good idea, it is the law.


constitutional conservative

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:00:38 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Hey tazzygirl,

Should a permit be required in order to step out of your car while driving through Forest Service land? (In some national forests it is.)

And should a permit be required for a few kids to rearrange a few rocks in a stream so they can have a little bit deeper pool to play in (not in a national park or a designated wilderness area, just some ordinary river somewhere)?


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

1. Why are the religious concerns even relevant?  ~~ isnt even relevant

and

2. Why destroy them now? What reason could there possibly be. ~~ no permits... no inspections... the Forestry service has a duty to ensure public safety.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:03:03 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

But mnottertail,

Aren't we all children of the Earth mother?

Isn't it all sacred ground and water?

Isn't everything sacred?

Especially sex, and drugs, and rock and roll?




quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

in that article, here is more what happened:

indians said, thats religious ground, we want it gone (cause they seen it and complained) and hey they are people too, they just got a reason you don't like.

USFS: becoming aware of it.... hey, he didn't get a permit to do this, (as is required by law) hold a hearing (as is required by law) and get an environmental impact statement (as is required by law), therefore it has to come down (as is required by law), but some folks like it, and it ain't a bad idea, so if he gets the permit and does the rest (as required by law) we could see it being built.

that is about all there is, there is no larger issue here. It is not just a good idea, it is the law.


constitutional conservative


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:05:39 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and the religious argument was not the reason that they say it has to come down, the burden of proof will be on the tribe.

The bitch is what made them aware of it.

and fuck a bunch of earth mothers, K? Nothing to do with what it is.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:05:46 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


People enjoy them, ergo they should be there.



What a childish argument. I'm sure some people would enjoy a go-cart track there, too. Most people wouldn't, but some would probably consider it an "improvement." Does that  mean if someone sneaks in and builds one in the middle of the night, there's no reason to close it down? If someone builds a motocross course in the Badlands, do we just leave it there because some people enjoy it? The structures are not supposed to be there, they were built illegally, done deal.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:08:11 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Your argument is worse. "Is not supposed to be there" sounds... well, worse. "Just because" or "Because I said" isn't an argument at all. The fact that people enjoy them is an argument. And again, you're building strawmen, no one is arguing for a go cart track or a motocross in a national park...




quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

What a childish argument. I'm sure some people would enjoy a go-cart track there, too. Most people wouldn't, but some would probably consider it an "improvement." Does that  mean if someone sneaks in and builds one in the middle of the night, there's no reason to close it down? If someone builds a motocross course in the Badlands, do we just leave it there because some people enjoy it? The structures are not supposed to be there, they were built illegally, done deal.



< Message edited by Sanity -- 10/23/2009 12:09:46 PM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:09:17 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
no, his argument is not 'because' his argument is 'because it is the law', same as mine.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:10:29 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

"The law" doesn' require their removal, mnottertail.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

no, his argument is not 'because' his argument is 'because it is the law', same as mine.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:11:27 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
what planet are you from? the law requires their removal.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:14:19 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

The law doesn't require their removal, religious fundamentalists require their removal, and the Federal Government is at their beck and call.

And you're in favor of that?

Because people could be havin' wild sex orgies in them pools?

There are all kinds of structures on Federal lands that have never been approved by anyone and which no one insists have to go. Which law are you referring to. Sure, everything requires a permit now. Scratchin' your ass? Get a permit first. But the laws don't require that anything has to be destroyed.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

what planet are you from? the law requires their removal.


< Message edited by Sanity -- 10/23/2009 12:21:39 PM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:20:13 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No, federal law requires removal and restoration, and CAN (not SHALL) include taking anything that was used in the commission of crime, that is his vehicle, anything in it, his checkbook including cash if it is found that he paid with check for the mortar, tools and costs of reclamation.

R

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:23:10 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

In a wilderness area maybe, or in a national park. But otherwise, nah. You're wading in it pretty deep.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, federal law requires removal and restoration, and CAN (not SHALL) include taking anything that was used in the commission of crime, that is his vehicle, anything in it, his checkbook including cash if it is found that he paid with check for the mortar, tools and costs of reclamation.

R


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:30:45 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
back in the old neighborhood- a neighbor went thru a waiver to build a over sized garage.

it was quite the exception to what was allowed.

Anyhow- now 20 years later- when I was looking at tax assessments- the county does not acknowledge the improvement.  If they ever DO - then 20 years of under assessments could surface. 

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:37:49 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The law doesn't require their removal, religious fundamentalists require their removal, and the Federal Government is at their beck and call.

And you're in favor of that?

Because people could be havin' wild sex orgies in them pools?



Ah, tinfoiling and cherry picking......this from your own original link which you have clipped to change the viewpoint of what ACTUALLY OCCURRED.


These pools were built without a permit by one man.

"He was very cooperative. He was a well intentioned individual. But what he did was a violation of the U.S. Forest Service," said John Erickson, District Ranger.

That man paid a fine and did community service as punishment.

Now a year after they were built, the Forest Service says the cement tubs need to be destroyed.

"People don't realize it's illegal to construct those structures that he built there," said Erickson.

Erickson is not the only who feels the tubs need to go. A spokesman for the Shoshone-Paiute Indian tribe says the hot springs are sacred, and are being misused with alcohol, drugs and sex.

"Hot springs are a place where people go for healing and prayer, ceremonies," said Ted Howard, Shoshone-Paiute cultural resource director.

Many we spoke with agree the hot springs are sacred, but they think the tubs should be kept the way they are. They commend the man who built them.

"He had to pay community service as if this wasn't the biggest community service this guy could have done. They guy should have some kind of monument and to be recognized down here," said Toby Simpson.

"When you heard these pools maybe leaving maybe gone what did you think about that?" asked NewsChannel 7.

"It almost made me cry," said Brandt Seefeldt.

Now Brandt Seefeldt and Mary Hildreth are gathering support to keep the pools intact. They say the public should have a say on what happens to them.

"The conversation should be now. And the ideas to improve something that already exists is -- A, more cost effective, and B, more logical than ripping it down and maybe starting a new," said Seefeldt.

"What people are essentially asking me to do is ignore management of the forest and meeting our regulations," said Erickson.

After the tubs are destroyed, the Forest Service says that might be the time to have that discussion on what can be done to develop this area.

The tubs will be destroyed in the near future.

Those who want the tubs to stay are trying to get legal help.

----------------------
It is not uncommon for people to use tarps and rocks to make impromptu pools near hot springs in Idaho's forests. But a man - who officials with the U.S. Attorney's office refuse to identify - used mortar and rocks to make a series of permanent pools on the riverbank. It was done without permission from the Boise National Forest or the Shoshone-Paiute Tribe, which would have had to be consulted for the work to be approved.

"We have highly developed structures that were made illegally," Boise National Forest spokesman Dave Olson said. "District Ranger (John Erickson) felt that (it) was unauthorized, illegal use of the land. (Representatives of) the Shoshone-Paiute also became aware of this work and became concerned about it."

Boise National Forest officials say the man who built the pools eventually paid a fine and served community service.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:42:12 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

XI has asked me very politely in the past to not post articles in their entirety due to copyright laws...

And so "cherry pick" I must.

Its odd that you would try to condemn me for it though, especially since I clearly posted all the pertinent links for you to freely click on.





< Message edited by Sanity -- 10/23/2009 12:44:40 PM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:45:48 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I understand, but in your cherry picking and your subject, you have changed the entire viewpoint of what happened, this was not a result of indian religious fundamentalists, this was about the LAW in NATIONAL FORESTS, IN NATIONAL WATERS.

So, gertie and bertie are pissed off, so fuckin what? what about the other 300 mill or so people who own that?

Ron

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/23/2009 12:46:46 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:46:01 PM   
ModeratorEleven


Posts: 2007
Joined: 8/14/2005
Status: offline
I didn't ask you to selectively choose excerpts to attempt to support your own position and ignore those that blow it out of the water.  If you're going to troll, at least be honest about your motives.

XI



_____________________________

This mod goes to eleven.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds - 10/23/2009 12:48:40 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Which parts would you like to see posted that I omitted?

What in either of those articles changes anything.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to ModeratorEleven)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Native American Spirituality & The Feds Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.107