RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

MasterJack53 -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 12:32:43 PM)

I recently called CBS and spoke with a representative of Kati Currics news show. I was calling because for several shows she had aired inflamatory, and in my opiniopn, unnecessary racial stories that to me only open wounds previously closed. The gentleman I spoke with discussed racial profiling and such with me. I got the impression from his manner of speaking and his voice he was Black. It ended up with me telling him Kati was a racist and if it happend anymore I would stop watching her show. Im sure that sent a ripple all the way up CBS' ass. haha Needless to say, I do see more pro democrat stories on her nightly news. Just my thoughts. Master Jack a conservative by nature not political affiliation.



MasterJack53 -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 12:35:21 PM)

excellent point!! well said!! WUFF WUFF!!



luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 12:35:59 PM)

Yet there is no evidence that the record says what he claimed...thats the point.

And no MNOT, the entire military is not purged everytime there is an election in the USA. Are you really that stupid to think only republicans are in th Millitary when there is a republican president. Really? That fucking dumb?


I do understand now that you have no clue what a citation is for. More of the left wing equivilancy game I suppose. You have a citation of an allegation. Not a citation of evidence.

And if you haven't figured that out by now, you ain't going to.



mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 1:42:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

And no MNOT, the entire military is not purged everytime there is an election in the USA. Are you really that stupid to think only republicans are in th Millitary when there is a republican president. Really? That fucking dumb?

No, you are the fucking idiot here, learn to read and comprehend at a 6th grade level you fuckstick. Never said that or anything like that.


I do understand now that you have no clue what a citation is for. More of the left wing equivilancy game I suppose. You have a citation of an allegation. Not a citation of evidence.

Fuck you troll, you haven't proffered a citation of anything, ever....you dont have citations for any the shit drooling out of your mouth.


And if you haven't figured that out by now, you ain't going to.

Yeah, and if everyone doesnt know you are a sockpuppet with about 15 profiles coming out here and gladhanding yourself, then they aint going to.




tazzygirl -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 1:51:32 PM)

oh we know Master Ron... lol... its funny actually, in a pathetic kind of way.



mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 1:55:45 PM)

Well, you gotta admit, the kid is a goddamn hoot and a half.....I am almost passing out from no air laughing half the time I read and post with him.

Ron



tazzygirl -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 1:59:44 PM)

LOL... he is easily wound up



mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 2:02:21 PM)

Tazz,

well, I figure him and his profiles are from somewhere around boston, really he got a dry sense of humor like his sigline.....

all his sockpuppets got a sig something like .....

I was posting on sockpuppet13 but it got fucked up...

(ya think?)

Ron



luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 2:33:41 PM)

Mnot. I can't really argue with "Fuck you troll" Neat trick to make it look I was saying that.


I guess I am done with this thread.

It is funny you think I am an army of some sort. And Tazzy buys into your delusions.



mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 2:35:40 PM)

why cant you argue with that? you dont have to proffer citations, and only rip apart others proffered to you, ignore them, say they say what they dont say, it is what you do, right? I mean thats your schtick out here.



luckydawg -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 2:46:15 PM)

yawn, nope.
See you are using the stupid liberal equivilancy tactic again. And its dumb. All cites are not equall. every Jackass in the world knows that.

What do want a cite for?


I did indeed cite the actuall apology. Actually I simply had to refer to it, since Sanity had previously posted it. I guess you missed it while screaming "sockpuppet". I gave a list of significant differences in the apologies, and you insult, and derail.

And are accusing me of having an army of profiles, thats the funny part. The mods see the Ips and know thats not true at all. But since your obsessed with me, whatever. Have your delusions. I guess all the homosexuall and shit eating insults are projections from in your mind. That ain't my thing, but I guess its yours. I honestly would think that on a kink site using Homophobic insults like you do would be banned, but mod 11 is ok with it.

I got the flu so I am online for a few days. The level of discussion created by Mod 11 is really pretty worthless, so I rarely come in any more. I live in Alaska, and have never pretended otherwise.



servantforuse -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (10/29/2009 7:38:30 PM)

How could Kati Couric possibly have more pro democratic stories that she has now? Her bias towards republicans is blatant and it shows up in the ratings.



Sanity -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (11/1/2009 4:41:13 PM)

Rep. King exposed the fact that its perfectly alright to be divisive, trashy and three, four, five kinds of vulgar and still have a financial interest in an NFL football team so long as you lean left politically. 


quote:

Youtube - King Questions Goodell on Limbaugh Comments

In an October 28, 2009 House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Steve King questions NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on comments he made regarding Rush Limbaugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdCimSglD3c&feature=player_embedded



mnottertail -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (11/1/2009 4:42:45 PM)

good for him, but I see that Don King only runs prizefights.



kdsub -> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime (11/1/2009 8:53:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Rep. King exposed the fact that its perfectly alright to be divisive, trashy and three, four, five kinds of vulgar and still have a financial interest in an NFL football team so long as you lean left politically. 


quote:

Youtube - King Questions Goodell on Limbaugh Comments

In an October 28, 2009 House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Steve King questions NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on comments he made regarding Rush Limbaugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdCimSglD3c&feature=player_embedded



I see you have directed this at me...Why...what does it have to do with this thread?

Butch



Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125