HPV Vaccine - WTF? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety



Message


Chaingang -> HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/10/2006 12:31:40 PM)

"An HPV Vaccine -- At Last!"
Published in Journal Watch Women's Health January 8, 2003
http://womens-health.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2003/108/1

...

So fully 3 years later I ask: what is the status of this vaccine? Anyone know? A preventative against something as common as this seems like a good idea on its face.

Back in college days the suggestion was that 50% of the women on campus had HPV Type 16.




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/10/2006 12:44:21 PM)

If I recall correctly, tests were extremely positive for the vaccine being effective, but that it was getting a lot of bad press by groups suggesting it would encourage extra marital and young adult sex. I'm sure there's articles and updates out there.




Chaingang -> RE: HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/10/2006 1:00:22 PM)

Hmmm, looks like there is more than one type of HPV that goes for the cervix. So this would be limited protection at best. But even so...

I guess bullshit morality trumps good health in the U.S.




tasha_tart -> RE: HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/10/2006 3:20:18 PM)


It appears that the pharmaceutical manufacturers are moving ahead:




windchymes -> RE: HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/10/2006 7:32:10 PM)

I'm sure Merck is in high gear to generate revenue, due to the millions they've lost and stand to lose in the Vioxx trials.




ModeratorOne -> RE: HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/10/2006 10:28:52 PM)

quote:

By 2005, reports of successful vaccine trials had already surfaced. Merck reported a successful preliminary trial of an HPV-16 vaccine for women in 2002. A 2004 report from Merck revealed that a vaccine showed promise in preventing up to 90 percent of four strains of the virus. In late 2004, an international clinical trial conducted by Dartmouth Medical School and the Norris Cotton Cancer Center reported a combination HPV-16/HPV-18 vaccine trial in women that was successful against persistent infection of HPV after 27 months. But even bigger news came in October of 2005, when Merck announced that a large clinical trial of a vaccine called Gardasil showed that women who received three vaccinations over a six-month period were 100 percent free of cervical cancer or precancerous lesions caused by HPV-16 and HPV-18. In women who were vaccinated only once during the six-month period, the vaccine was 97 percent effective. Merck also found the vaccine effective against HPV-6 and HPV-11. In order to become available to the public, Gardasil first needs approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. While this will take time, especially given the current political climate, Merck hopes to make the vaccine available by late 2006. http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/3701.html





proudsub -> RE: HPV Vaccine - WTF? (3/11/2006 5:41:16 PM)

quote:

In late 2004, an international clinical trial conducted by Dartmouth Medical School and the Norris Cotton Cancer Center reported a combination HPV-16/HPV-18 vaccine trial in women that was successful against persistent infection of HPV after 27 months. But even bigger news came in October of 2005, when Merck announced that a large clinical trial of a vaccine called Gardasil showed that women who received three vaccinations over a six-month period were 100 percent free of cervical cancer or precancerous lesions caused by HPV-16 and HPV-18. In women who were vaccinated only once during the six-month period, the vaccine was 97 percent effective. Merck also found the vaccine effective against HPV-6 and HPV-11.


If i am reading that right it sounds like the trials were done on women already infected with HPV and the vaccinations were a cure for many. Am i interpreting it right?




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875