Hierodule -> RE: Is there a difference between being a submissive and a slave (12/14/2009 5:34:12 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: shinylight7 A slave is a servant who has consented to being treated lowly. A slave is weak. Not in my relationship. My Master doesn't "get off" on treating people lowly so he doesn't do it. Also I called myself his "sexual servant" once and he slapped me. To him that implies hired help. Obviously, not all Masters/Mistresses feel the same way. Its different for everyone. I have said this before: When I first started reading posts here I thought, geez louise, I'm not a slave! So I told my Master. And he said don't tell me what you are. What matters is what I want and how willing you are to give it to me. I own you, you are my slave. I think this goes back to the "rumcake" thing in the sense that every relationship is defined by its participants. If I were to draw any kind of distinction at all between the two, I would say that slave implies an ownership dynamic and sub implies a more romantic, or casual, dynamic. But even that is limiting if I am talking about relationships that I am not a part of.
|
|
|
|