Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Up until about a year ago I lived alone. It was nice, I could do what I want (including some quite dangerous selfbondage) at any time day or night almost. I could crank up the tunes at 4AM, burn one whenever I pleased, basically whatever I want. I was never lonely. The phone rang enough, people stopped over and it was like a balance between my public time and my private time. Sure I hit the net, here included, but there was never a problem. Given this I would like to open up a discussion which pretty much boils down to the difference between being alone and being lonely, or feeling isolated. Now my personal opinion has been shaped, and I believe a few certain things. First of all noone, even your Parents owe you any entertainment. I've read where the author describes that in childhood if they went up to their Parents and said "I am bored" they would get smacked upside the head. In other words, if you need to be amused, do it, don't bother me with it. These were obviously not stupid people being authors and such. But what is the real difference ? The lack of company happens all the time. It may be Wednesday night and everyone has to go to work the next day, but if noone comes to see you on Friday it is a problem. Why ? I am not talking about scheduling difficulties here, I mean the spirit of the,,,,,,,,,,,, damifino. There are times you are alone, not on the phone or the net, not expecting anyone at all and you just do your thing and everything is cool. Then there are other times it bothers you, that you fell dejected, rejected, inspected and forgected (poetic license invoked, @03/11/10 00:43 hours). Of course I have my opinion on this, go figure, but I thought it might make a good topic for discussion. And up for contention is also that I might be full of shit. If I am alone I have computers and musical instruments. I can do something, is that a substitute ? Surely I am not superior because I gave some guy fifty bucks for a guitar. But that isn't all of it. Even without the computer I can do something. Long ago I would design electronic circuitry, just because I wanted to. Yesterday I started writing a song, with a pen and paper. What is the difference, what causes this interdependence ? I am seeking to understand here. Of course the net is part of my life now, so it happened, but really I wasn't on it so much years ago. They dragged me kicking and screaming into this. I have dragged my feet all the way, Windows 3.11 FWG failed me in 1998, at which time I got Windows 95. And XP was out for at least two years befor I got 98. All I wanted was what I wanted. Now I don't even answer my own phone, I got someone else to do it. I do not lack people or attention. But there was a time in my life when I would not see or talk to another human being for like two days, and it didn't bother me a bit. Can anyone wrap their mind around this ? I mean I was not antisocial nor asocial, I just didn't care that I was alone and I found something to do. I am not referring to present company, but it seems like that is very difficult for some people. Would someone like to expound on this ? Because, looking at this section of the forum right there is Social isolation ........ whatever about cancer. I think it is true of many different diseases. And everything actually. Your well being is partly controlled by your mind, I will not argue against that. But is your perception of simply being alone translated into isolation ? I don't see why. Being alone, and I mean really alone can be a good time for introspection and deep thought. A time without interruptions and who knows what. A time to chill your jets, to really cop some relaxation. Why do so many not like it, or even go so far as to avoid it, to shun it and to make sure it never happens ? It DOES affect one's well being, but that is still based on perception. Why percieve it that way ? What say you ? T
|