RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/14/2010 1:41:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Follow the thread back. I too recall seeing the poll, though I don't recall the specifics,  what the percentages were. But advocating the bombing of civilians, isn't that supposed to be a bad thing? Or are Muslims exempt from such moral judgment because it only applies to Westerners for some unknowable reason.

So you saw the poll truckinslave saw too, but you can't provide a source for it either.
And if the American military is exempt from moral censure for bombing civilians, I don't see why Hamas and the Pakistani psychopaths in Afghanistan shouldn't be able to expect the same courtesy.




Apocalypso -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/14/2010 1:52:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
[Were those 72% being honest, or were they appropriately worried that if they said they were true to the teachings of Mohammad they would then become pariahs.


It was a completely anonymous poll, so that can't be the case.

quote:

It is alright for Muslims to lie to nonbelievers to further the cause of Islam, after all.


No it isn't.   Taqiyya only permits a Muslim to lie to protect themselves from imminent danger.  Nowhere does it say it's permissable to lie to "further the cause of Islam".


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

28% of your Muslims, if I remember the poll correctly, expressed sympathy/agreement with your own subway bombers.

I have talked to those I know. Which has nothing to do with the aspirations of hegemony held by Imams the world over.




So that means 72% didnt.





truckinslave -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/14/2010 7:14:02 PM)

It means 72% didn't admit to it.




thornhappy -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/14/2010 7:16:36 PM)

Sounds like you believe all wish to carry out jihad.




popeye1250 -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/14/2010 7:58:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Arbitration panels are nothing new in the UK, as well as civil courts working alongside criminal courts. There was much made of this at the time the article was published, 18 months ago. Criminal courts have not been superceded by Sharia courts. Muslims are subject to the same laws as anyone else.

As for Muslims taking over the world, Cheney and Bush did a great job scaring you didnt they.



Polite, you keep thinking that! Then someday they'll come for you.




Politesub53 -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 1:33:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Polite, you keep thinking that! Then someday they'll come for you.


I dont know what world some of you live in. I doubt if any poster actually in the UK would agree with your anti Muslim comment Popeye. All it seems to me is an uninformed comment, based on ignorance.




truckinslave -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 4:52:02 AM)

Do the projections. Read the history.

Your culture, your very nation, are slipping away, and to a violent end if history is a guide (and if it isn't, what is?).

Your grand-daughters will wear burkhas. But it doesn't matter, because you know a couple of the progenitors of their rulers, and they're just really swell.




Politesub53 -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 5:02:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Do the projections. Read the history.

Your culture, your very nation, are slipping away, and to a violent end if history is a guide (and if it isn't, what is?).

Your grand-daughters will wear burkhas. But it doesn't matter, because you know a couple of the progenitors of their rulers, and they're just really swell.


Yourself and Popeye are grossly delusional. Most Brits are more worried about the EU than Muslims.

Edited for spelling




truckinslave -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 5:37:08 AM)

From the telegrah and one from the Daily Mail




Moonhead -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 8:20:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Do the projections. Read the history.

Your culture, your very nation, are slipping away, and to a violent end if history is a guide (and if it isn't, what is?).

Your grand-daughters will wear burkhas. But it doesn't matter, because you know a couple of the progenitors of their rulers, and they're just really swell.


Yourself and Popeye are grossly delusional. Most Brits are more worried about the EU than Muslims.

Edited for spelling

Whereas they should be worried about the fact that whichever fuckwit the Americans elect spends the next four years dictating our foreign policy and dragging us into wars that don't even approach serving any of our interests. At least we get to vote for MEPs...




kdsub -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 8:45:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Follow the thread back. I too recall seeing the poll, though I don't recall the specifics,  what the percentages were. But advocating the bombing of civilians, isn't that supposed to be a bad thing? Or are Muslims exempt from such moral judgment because it only applies to Westerners for some unknowable reason.

So you saw the poll truckinslave saw too, but you can't provide a source for it either.
And if the American military is exempt from moral censure for bombing civilians, I don't see why Hamas and the Pakistani psychopaths in Afghanistan shouldn't be able to expect the same courtesy.


Here is something...It still only talks about polls but does not show them.




Aneirin -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 9:06:36 AM)

Well, if Islam is sliding into Britain by immigration and more so others joining the religion, at least it might be better in that the majority of followers of Islam actually adhere to the Qur'anic codes of conduct, not just use them when it suits them like some other religions, or say a few prayers after the failing, a case of yeah, I know I did wrong, I knew before I did it, but I am ok now in the eyes of my god, I have bunged it a few prayers.

Instead of all this fear and hate mongering, do the dhimmis actually understand about Islam.




truckinslave -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 11:08:38 AM)

I understand enough to suspect you would not do well under sharia.




Sanity -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 12:10:08 PM)


What you're claiming isn't accurate, at least not according to Wiki:

quote:

Al-Tabari's (d. 923) famous tafsir (exegesis of the Koran) is a standard and authoritative reference work in the entire Muslim world. Regarding 3:28, he writes: "If you [Muslims] are under their [infidels'] authority, fearing for yourselves, behave loyally to them, with your tongue, while harboring inner animosity for them. … Allah has forbidden believers from being friendly or on intimate terms with the infidels in place of believers — except when infidels are above them [in authority]. In such a scenario, let them act friendly towards them." Regarding 3:28, Ibn Kathir (d. 1373, second in authority only to Tabari) writes, "Whoever at any time or place fears their [infidels'] evil may protect himself through outward show." As proof of this, he quotes Muhammad's close companion, Abu Darda, who said, "Let us smile to the face of some people [non-Muslims] while our hearts curse them"; another companion, al-Hassan, said, "Doing taqiyya is acceptable till the Day of Judgment [i.e., in perpetuity]. Source: "War and Peace - and Deceit - in Islam" by Raymond Ibrahim /Pajamas Media February 12, 2009


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya


According to this, Muslims in Britain have almost a duty to lie to the pollsters asking such probing questions about their faith.




NorthernGent -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 12:26:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Do the projections. Read the history.

Your culture, your very nation, are slipping away, and to a violent end if history is a guide (and if it isn't, what is?).

Your grand-daughters will wear burkhas. But it doesn't matter, because you know a couple of the progenitors of their rulers, and they're just really swell.



The flaw in your logic being that in the event we are there for the taking in terms of having our heads turned and rushing down the mosque.....then we really don't have much in the way of culture to protect.




LadyEllen -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 1:14:42 PM)

What is it with some people?

For one, with no evidence whatever to support it apart from raving wild eyed xenophobia, they claim that I'm at imminent risk from my neighbours, who are here not to raise a family and deliver me my Friday night takeaway, but as part of some plot to convert or kill me, which they convene presumably of a Friday afternoon at their not so secret HQ round the corner.

For two, with no experience whatever of Muslims, they ascribe every kind of evil to the lot of them on the strength of what a few nutters whom they disown and are ashamed of have done and said, equally ignoring that of all the people who live round me the Muslims are the only lot who dont cause trouble day and night.

For three, for some utterly unknown reason they believe that should any of their prophecies have the slightest chance of coming true and an attempt be made to forcibly convert the UK (or Europe for that matter) to Islam, that we would simply roll over and submit, ignoring that all in all we're the most vicious bastards on the planet, obstinate, proud and resistant. If Hitler couldnt do it, do they really think this lot have the slightest chance should they be so disposed?

And now, with no knowledge of the English civil law system they pronounce that sharia law threatens to overcome us because a bunch of Muslims are using a UK Act of Parliament to convene arbitration procedures between them according to their customs, under the law of England and thence the EU.

Mind you, I'm pretty well convinced that some people will only be happy when we have Nuremberg laws imposed, varying only in the objects of their ire and the particular symbol sewn on clothing.

E




Moonhead -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 1:20:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

What is it with some people?

For one, with no evidence whatever to support it apart from raving wild eyed xenophobia, they claim that I'm at imminent risk from my neighbours, who are here not to raise a family and deliver me my Friday night takeaway, but as part of some plot to convert or kill me, which they convene presumably of a Friday afternoon at their not so secret HQ round the corner.

For two, with no experience whatever of Muslims, they ascribe every kind of evil to the lot of them on the strength of what a few nutters whom they disown and are ashamed of have done and said, equally ignoring that of all the people who live round me the Muslims are the only lot who dont cause trouble day and night.

For three, for some utterly unknown reason they believe that should any of their prophecies have the slightest chance of coming true and an attempt be made to forcibly convert the UK (or Europe for that matter) to Islam, that we would simply roll over and submit, ignoring that all in all we're the most vicious bastards on the planet, obstinate, proud and resistant. If Hitler couldnt do it, do they really think this lot have the slightest chance should they be so disposed?

And now, with no knowledge of the English civil law system they pronounce that sharia law threatens to overcome us because a bunch of Muslims are using a UK Act of Parliament to convene arbitration procedures between them according to their customs, under the law of England and thence the EU.

Mind you, I'm pretty well convinced that some people will only be happy when we have Nuremberg laws imposed, varying only in the objects of their ire and the particular symbol sewn on clothing.

E

I hope that this is because the only UK papers these people have ever read are the Mail and the Telegraph. That's the most optimistic possibility, anyway.
You're dead right that the arson attacks on mosques after the 2005 bombings seems to have escaped their notice, though: "Paki bashing" came back into fashion after that one for six months as well, iirc. There hadn't been much of that shit for a good decade by then.




Aneirin -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 1:21:06 PM)

For decades, we have had our culture destroyed, not by immigrants you understand, but our own lot in the name of political correctness, we can't fly our flag with pride in case it offends someone, and in some places we can't live as we wish just in case we offend an immigrant, these are our own people that stop and re educate us, to save offending the incomers. For example the Mecca betting business received flack for it's name, a name it has had for decades, another problem was a person who collected porcelain pigs and had them in her window, the council official told her to move them in case a Moslem walked past and was offended.

Our culture, if indeed we actually had one has been eroded by our own people to save the sensibilities of others, as a result what we have now, is more foreign than what you might think, as it was, a few years back the national british favourite food was curry. On nights out, an evening after a few jars would not be complete without a kebab, where does that food originate I wonder, called a shwarma elsewhere.

Oh, and regards I might not do well living under Sharia law, well I have lived under Sharia law before, and had no problems with it. It is all about respect, if rules exist, respect them, simple.





Moonhead -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 1:30:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

For decades, we have had our culture destroyed, not by immigrants you understand, but our own lot in the name of political correctness, we can't fly our flag with pride in case it offends someone

So you don't see St George Cross' hanging from car windows whenever there's a football tournament, then?
quote:

and in some places we can't live as we wish just in case we offend an immigrant, these are our own people that stop and re educate us, to save offending the incomers. For example the Mecca betting business received flack for it's name, a name it has had for decades, another problem was a person who collected porcelain pigs and had them in her window, the council official told her to move them in case a Moslem walked past and was offended.

Perhaps you could provide a citation for these cases? A Mail story that provides no names or locations doesn't count.

quote:

Our culture, if indeed we actually had one has been eroded by our own people to save the sensibilities of others, as a result what we have now, is more foreign than what you might think, as it was, a few years back the national british favourite food was curry. On nights out, an evening after a few jars would not be complete without a kebab, where does that food originate I wonder, called a shwarma elsewhere.

Chicken tikka masala, specifically, I believe. And the fact that we're still able to go out and get knee walking pissed does suggest that the terrible cultural threat posed by the jihadists might be a teensy bit exaggerated in the first place.
Still, maybe you'd like to stamp out Morris dancing (imported from central Africa, by Moors) as well while you're about that one. The big problem with cultural imperailism mostly comes from the other side of the atlantic. Historically immigrants have enriched the culture rather than harming it. The Uganda asians who were sent over here when Idi Amin got all afrocentric are the only reason the NHS is still going, to pick one obvious example. That was like the country winning the lottery.




LadyEllen -> RE: MUSLIM COURTS HAVE HEARD 100 CASES IN BRITAIN (3/15/2010 1:36:47 PM)

Just as a side note - chicken tikka masala is a British dish, created in Britain for the uncouth Brits who wanted sauce with their tikka that some chef had spent years learning how to master. Also, its one of the most disgusting dishes to be found on a menu although ubiquitous.

Aneirin makes a reasonable point, though I feel the issues he identifies are mainly personal indoctrination resulting from British reserve combined with the failed (yet ongoing) multi-cultural model we pursue.

E




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875