Lockit -> RE: Taking a Male Slave for prolonged naked and restrained walkabout (4/12/2010 9:41:19 AM)
|
LOL... I was trying so hard to be open minded about this. I really was. But... Let's put a couple fact's together. You want a woman who is based in reality and your well written profile is a bit far out there. Case in point, you want her mostly in an el' natural state so that you and men can enjoy her beautiful body. You present as someone that is wealthy, which you could be, but she is basically to be supported by you and all that fancy stuff and even offer up marriage if she will commit to being obedient or she will get none of your wealth, which says to my mind... no I am not a lawyer, but it isn't rocket science that there would be pre-nup. Which means you set the stage for this marriage of your convenience which you are protected in and I do wonder what your lil princess slave will have as protection if she doesn't work out. I do hope you provide for her when the fantasy wears off and you wish to rid yourself of her. A woman not employed can be harmed by a situation like this through social security and a number of other things. As a lawyer, I guess you would know that. Then your first post on your new profile... and I have seen your picture around here before and for all I know you could have written to me, because I have seen your picture... anyway... your first post is on the mistress board, telling a lil story that could or could not be true, about a man with his bits bound on a walk in a wealthy neighborhood. Okay, your being a dominant with a picture and a name I recognize from around here, new profile, new post... that isn't in a male dominant frame of mind... well it's just questionable and you give cause for reasonable doubt. Therefore Mr. Man of the legal system, I have to stick with reasonable doubt and call Bull Shit.
|
|
|
|