Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Civilisation ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Civilisation ? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 6:46:11 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Pygmy life expectancy adn child mortality rates.

This one is of the Aka, which as you pointed out is the same as Mtubi, just like Jones and Smiths...

"About 30,000 Aka live in the tropical forests of northern Congo and southern Central African Republic. Most Aka live in remote areas of the tropical forest where the population density is less than one person per square mile. Aka women average six live births during their lifetime. One-fifth of Aka children do not live to their first birthday, and close to half die before they reach age fifteen. Infectious and parasitic diseases (from the clean drinking water) are the most common causes of death. Due to the high child mortality (death) rate, average life expectancy at birth is only thirty-two years of age. However, if a young person lives to age fifteen, he or she will probably live to age fifty-five or older.


Yet the field data says that the age is higher


http://www.africaguide.com/culture/tribes/pygmies.htm
This was the source of my first number. On looking around more, I find that is kind of low.


They appear to be a tourist company...do you find the opinions of a tourist agency to be as compelling as the field work of scientists?

In fact current scientific thinking is that the condition of being a pygmy (they are not just found in africa) is an evolutionary result of extremely low life expectancy.

I am not sure that has anything to do with the discussion but the data do not support that contention. Which is referenced in the sites below.
Both of the below cites concern the work of the same person. Dr. Miglianos work is still an hypothisis and will be peer reviewed I am sure. If you know of any please link me to them. I find her work interesting.


http://www.pnas.org/content/104/51/20216.full

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-pygmies-evolved-to-be-shorter


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 6:49:15 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
The topic does not say "Civiliszation. Civilisation for the USA".

It says "Civilisation?". And then Anerin postsd an article about Green Anarchy, and asks if people think it is an attractive viable future for Mankind .


What does eating meat and the relative use of solar power in its production have to do with that?

Are you in need of mental help?

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to pyroaquatic)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 6:52:11 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic

Why would you assume this?

That I have no metal to boil my water. I have metal.

Adapt or Die.

Edited to add: Babbling. Accuse me of babbling!?



they are talking about the congo, not your kitchen


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to pyroaquatic)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 6:53:50 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Then provide some field Data T, you so far have presented exactly zero....

Nor have you provided any evidence of them not being poor. your claim
Nor any evidence that they live long healthy lives on par with the west. your claim
Nor any evidence that they have a sustainable independant unchanging culture. your claim




_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 6:58:28 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

"Clean Water is A Challenge for Congo's Rural Poor
Clean water is essential to life! The high child mortality rates in Congo is directly related to drinking water from unimproved and unsafe sources. Clean water save lives!

Generally, children under five years old die from severe or chronic diarrhea caused by poor water quality."

http://www.endingextremepoverty.org/2009/03/clean-water-is-a-challenge-for-congos-rural-poor.html

"Despite ongoing clashes in the east of the country, a study published earlier this year asserted that less than one percent of all deaths in the DRC were directly attributable to violence. "The majority of deaths have been due to infectious diseases, malnutrition and neonatal- and pregnancy-related conditions," stated the report, 'Mortality in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An ongoing crisis', produced by the IRC and the Burnet Institute - a medical research and public health organisation based in Melbourne.

All too often, the infectious diseases in question take hold because water supplies are contaminated.

"Mainly the causes (of diseases in the DRC) are water quality, whether or not the water has to be boiled, the hygiene is not clean around the house, and such," says Steven Lauwerier, deputy representative in the DRC for the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). "

http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42109



How many children in the UK die from lack of safe drinking water every year?


The idea that living naturally in the forest gives you safe clean drinnking water is nonsense.

If I had to drink from a random river, I would take the UK over Congo anyday (and the USA over either).





Neither of the two articles you posted say a word about the mbuti...they instead speak of the people in the CAR.
The data in question indicates that the mbuti draw their water from the daily rain. That the incursions into their lands have degraded their environment is not in dispute.

Your own statements about the ultimate lifespans of the mbuti indicates that it is ten to twelve years higher than the surrounding non-hgs, while the coresponding scientific data indicates closer to twenty years.

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:06:38 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Then why are you afraid to post any of this "data" you have.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2102rank.html

average life span in Congo is 54. Mbuti life span is 32. How do you see that as 10 to 12 years higher?

Ultimate lifespan? what does that even mean?

Absolutly no data you have introduced indicates they get thier water from the Daily rain. And they have a dry seaon, where they get no rain for a few months.


Quit pretending you introduced data, and do so.

Teach me something, don't just be a lying troll.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:07:56 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Then provide some field Data T, you so far have presented exactly zero....

Nor have you provided any evidence of them not being poor. your claim
Nor any evidence that they live long healthy lives on par with the west. your claim
Nor any evidence that they have a sustainable independant unchanging culture. your claim






The Forest People by Colin Turnbull.
It is all in there. It is a small book with large type and lots of pictures. Fully footnoted.
Other sources have been cited in the past few pages: Bahuchet for more field work and Laizos for a critique of Turnbull's field notes

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:10:39 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
So you have no data to introduce, at all. Just pretend that you have a special book with facts that disagree with every other source out there (hey thats what you did with you Cocaine is not addictive nonsense also). I have posted several sources.


And have highlighted you lying.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:27:55 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Then why are you afraid to post any of this "data" you have.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2102rank.html

average life span in Congo is 54. Mbuti life span is 32. How do you see that as 10 to 12 years higher?

The Ituri Forest,where the Mbuti live is in the DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) Not RoC (Republic of the Congo) Two different countries. The lifespan of people in the DRC is 46 years. Your statement that the mbuti life expectancy at birth was 32 and that half died by the age of 15 which means that the rest would have a life expectancy of 64 which is in line with the reported data from Turnbull.
This was explaned to you in post #35.



Ultimate lifespan? what does that even mean?

Ultimate lifespan would be that average age that those who survive purberty would live to.

Absolutly no data you have introduced indicates they get thier water from the Daily rain. And they have a dry seaon, where they get no rain for a few months.

It is kinda necessary to actually read the book before you can say it's wrong or even what it says.



Teach me something, don't just be a lying troll.
Do yor feel that these insults help to make your your point?



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 5/5/2010 7:29:43 PM >

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:35:55 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

So you have no data to introduce, at all. Just pretend that you have a special book with facts that disagree with every other source out there

Actually the sources I cited are the difinitive work on the subject.
If you choose not to consult it that is not my affair.



(hey thats what you did with you Cocaine is not addictive nonsense also). I have posted several sources.

Please try to stay on topic. If you want to discuss Cocaine just start a thread and I will be glad to discuss it with you.


And have highlighted you lying.
Something at which you have been singularly unsuccessful.


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:37:57 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
It was pointed out after post 32 your math was faulty.

some no Mtubi Congolese die by age 15 also. So you are trying to compare an adjusted rate for Mtubi to an unadjusted rate for the population in general.

More nonsense from you, in an attempt to defend a clearly incorrect point.

Lets look at your post 13.

"They live long healthy lives that are equal or greater than most industrialized societies.
No one is rich no one is poor. No one is hungry."


Complete and utter bullshit. Not even close to reality.



_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/5/2010 7:39:01 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
You didn't cite anything T, do you even know what that word means?

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 7:58:29 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:


Pyro, how could nomads boil water with no metal?


Actually pyro it is not difficult. People have been weaving watertight baskets for thousands of years.
Simply put water in the basket and put hot rocks from the fire in the basket full of water...voila...
boiling water.
One might even say "So simple even a cave man could do it" according to progressive ins.

(in reply to pyroaquatic)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 8:00:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
to say nothing of fired clay pots.

from dust thou came, and unto dust thou shalt return, boiling a little water upon the way.

Yh Wh, your buddy.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 8:14:52 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
If they have fire and make clay pots, wouldn't that make them a tool using society?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 10:06:01 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
There is alotta tools in society, I just can't enumerate them all.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 12:38:30 PM   
pyroaquatic


Posts: 1535
Joined: 12/4/2006
From: Pyroaquatica
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

The topic does not say "Civiliszation. Civilisation for the USA".

It says "Civilisation?". And then Anerin postsd an article about Green Anarchy, and asks if people think it is an attractive viable future for Mankind.

Anarchy is not supposed to have a set purpose. I would like to say that the american government has some twinges of anarchy in and of themselves.

What does eating meat and the relative use of solar power in its production have to do with that?

You must be incredibly daft. The sun powers every thing on this planet. At the same time the sun is killing us by vibrating our molecules into precancer, and then effentially cancer.

That is the Sun. Plants Need Sun.
In the wild the energy could go to flower, then a bug, then a snake, then a possum, and finally to the human consumer. That is lost energy.

Of course with COWS it has three stages of energy transference.
That is lost energy.

Of course there are some biproducts of cows that is both bane and bountiful but still... It does not offset a ' energy:use' ratio.

Are you in need of mental help?

Oh yes, brush off the insane person. His opinions, theories, insight, observational skills, ability to eat books, does not mean a damn thing.

This CIVILIZATION sorely lacks civil people. I have seen some dark places. You don't know me, you don't know my past, and you surely have no intention of actually displaying READING and COMPREHENSION skills.

Just your ability to fling feces and mud with your back legs. I am ignoring you so I do not have to face your troll. The one you hide in your back pocket. See you never again and good luck with whatever your goal in life is.


Well, a mylar sheet can focus sunlight but you have to get the parabola correct.

I had a crystal clear spot fresnel lens that could focus the suns energy into a spot the size of a half dollar. It gets up to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit and melts glass, steel, cook eggs, even pasta!

A mirror would come in handy in bouncing the concentrated beam. I have a very small pan that I use with my small fresnel lens. It boils water and does not take forever.

For entertaining myself I play the harmonica, sing, beatbox... no electrical equipment.

In fact I do not use powered tools. I use hand tools. Less moving parts to break.

Oh and about that tool thing:

The first tool mankind learned to manipulate is himself. The second tool mankind learned of is the ability to manipulate other people.




< Message edited by pyroaquatic -- 5/6/2010 1:03:58 PM >


_____________________________

You are what your deep, driving desire is.
As your desire is, so is your will.
As your will is, so is your deed.
As your deed is, so is your destiny.
-Brihadaranyaka Upanishad IV.4.5

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 2:15:19 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

to say nothing of fired clay pots.

from dust thou came, and unto dust thou shalt return, boiling a little water upon the way.

Yh Wh, your buddy.




The mbuti do not make pots they smoke pot.
The only crop they grow is not a food crop but pot which only the women cultivate...seems the girlz have the magic touch when it comes to the medicinal herb.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 2:16:39 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I am feeling a little neanderthal right now, then.  I am hep.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Civilisation ? - 5/6/2010 2:27:50 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If they have fire and make clay pots, wouldn't that make them a tool using society?


That would make them tool makers because they would have had to construct a kiln to fire the pot.
Pre-stone age people use and make tools it is just that the Mbuti, for what ever reason, decided not to make stone tools.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 5/6/2010 3:21:45 PM >

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Civilisation ? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.234