PeonForHer -> RE: The natural power that women have over men... (5/17/2010 1:39:40 PM)
|
Well, Lady E, that was thought-provoking! Here are a few, first off: quote:
The belief in some supernatural female power over men is one I find identified primarily with men who are fearful and in a deep seated way ashamed of their natural sexuality as this contrasts with the cultural ideal of what it is "to be a man". That would make more sense to me, personally, if I'd become less inclined to see 'female power over men' the more I'd come to embrace my own sub-feelings. The opposite's been the case, though. True, the idea of woman-as-Goddess - as some kind of 'fact about the universe' (demonstrable, even, by science) I've increasingly realised to be drivel. On the other hand, I've come to revel in those Goddess feelings that (many) subs love. They don't make sense, they're not remotely logical, and I'm fully aware that they come from me rather than her - but they're hellishly good feelings to have. This makes me think that, for some of those who do want to make an 'objective fact' out of female powers over men, the explanation could be a lot more straightforward: they have this strong feeling that seems to come from women (or a particular woman) and they'd like it to be more than just their personal feeling - to make it more 'real'. quote:
It is perfectly natural for a man to wish to please and to give to his mate his entire being, just as it is equally natural for a woman to wish to do likewise. That 'naturalness' of the desire for a man to wish to give his entire being to a woman would no doubt sound good to the ears of a sub-male - but would it sound good to those of a dominant male or female? If not, do femdoms and maledoms have desires that are 'unnatural'? You can't be saying this, surely? quote:
The cultural ideal of "man" is not sympathetic to this natural inclination, professing instead the alleged virtues of independence and emotional petrification whilst all the time these actually serve only to deter and destroy the chances of a healthy relationship. I'm not sure that it's so easy to distinguish between what's 'natural' and what's 'cultural ideal'. Some people like being independent, for instance, and I don't think there's any final way of saying whether that's down to nature or to nurture. (It's very difficult to do that in any context, of course.) Secondly, 'emotional petrification' seems something of a caricature. Others - particularly other women - often say men are far too emotionally volatile - and in all the wrong ways. Too aggressive, for instance. quote:
In summary, many men are daft, some women will exploit this - neither condition portrays either in the best light nor supports a healthy relationship. I'll ram this point home because I think the ramming's important: it's not just men who are daft to turn women into Goddesses, women themselves are daft if they believe it too much. As I tried to show, and La T's post (in part) did likewise, above, so much grief can come to women from that.
|
|
|
|