Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Virus transmission via aerosolization as a result of Cell Popping, Cautery Branding?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> Virus transmission via aerosolization as a result of Cell Popping, Cautery Branding? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Virus transmission via aerosolization as a result of Ce... - 5/25/2010 9:50:24 AM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
Very interesting discussions regarding the possibility of a means of transmission of some viruses resulting from Cell Popping and/or Cautery branding.

http://fetlife.com/groups/310/group_posts/578710

http://fetlife.com/groups/17890/group_posts/644715

< Message edited by mistoferin -- 5/25/2010 9:55:04 AM >


_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Virus transmission via aerosolization as a result o... - 5/30/2010 5:44:10 PM   
Mishna


Posts: 70
Joined: 11/1/2008
Status: offline
That's really interesting. Thanks for posting that. I have friends who are really into cell popping. I'm going to pass this along to them. 

(in reply to mistoferin)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Virus transmission via aerosolization as a result o... - 6/10/2010 6:47:15 AM   
allthatjaz


Posts: 2878
Joined: 8/20/2008
Status: offline
I remember that article but it seems it has vanished from the web.  The doctors in question, both regularly removed genital warts by electric cauterization method. They went on to develop HPV in their sinuses. Investigation showed that aerosolized tissue could have been the culprit.

Surgeons take precautions against 'surgical smoke' caused by laser and electorcautery procedures. Surgical smoke, sometimes known as plume or aerosol can contain a high temperature vapour that can be inhaled.
Studies have included melanoma mice that when cauterized, the aerosol plume was collected and analysis showed intact melanoma cells.

Workshops should provide each individual with a surgical mask and the brander should double up as he is the one most at risk being in such close proximatey of the skin being vaporized. There also needs to be a HUBA filter in very close proximatey of the brander and brandee. Dyson vacoom cleaners are noisy buggers but they have HUBA filters as well as long hoses that can be held close to the tissue combustion.

The good news is, the aerosol effect is very localized and so long as sensible precautions are carried out, there is little risk. The bad news is, there are lots of people doing this willynilly totally oblivious to things like the 'aerosol effect'.

We should also be aware that scalpels can create a low temperature aerosol and this has a higher chance of carrying viable infections.




_____________________________

S&M (Steve and Maria) persona libre de convencionalismos


Fan of edgeplay.co.uk

(in reply to Mishna)
Profile   Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Health and Safety >> Virus transmission via aerosolization as a result of Cell Popping, Cautery Branding? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063