Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Imagine there's no stock market...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Imagine there's no stock market... Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 4:52:40 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
-- gold and silver are both mentioned in the constitution, and in the Bible.

FRNs are not.

I want to thank my elders for teaching me that silver/gold is wealth-.  

Be sure to get gold before the devaluation.   3 to 1.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 321
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 5:01:01 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Central Banker's Dream - (n) the unlimited expansion of fiat currency and credit without the disastrous effects of price inflation or a loss of confidence in the paper currency itself. Why would the government want to suppress the price of gold and silver?
Gold and silver are real money. Gold and silver are competitors to paper fiat currencies the world over. Gold and silver values tend to inversely reflect the public's confidence in paper currency./sniphttp://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/05.10/explosion.html

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 322
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 5:17:05 PM   
Dubbelganger


Posts: 200
Joined: 4/9/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

No need to get testy. I was just suggesting some possible flaws in the way people think and talk about investments.

ETA I didn't say business was fictional. I said the value of a stock might be fictional.
Me, I always learned that Assets - Liabilities = Owner's Equity, OE being the net asset value of the company including retained earnings and receivables.

Now if there are 100 million shares of common stock outstanding, which are selling at $USD10 a share, that gives a market capitalization of $USD 1 billion. Yes?

But if the value of all assets - liabilities is only $100 million, then the stock is overvalued by a factor of 10, at that point in time, and without consideration of future earnings.

It's the future earning stream which gives the stock its additional value. If the market cap of a stock is wildly out of line with the earnings stream, given a particular set of economic conditions (x%GDP growth, y% unemployment, z% market share, aa% growth in market share, no new displacing tech innovations, and so on), then the price of a stock can indeed be "fictional". or irrational. I remember the gyrations my ex-wife went through trying to justify a P/E of 350 or so for eBay back in 98 when she was working on her Masters in Global E-Commerce.

Graham and Dodd are still relevant.

I do tend to agree that the stock markets function as a conduit for wealth from the investing classes to the ownership class.


< Message edited by Dubbelganger -- 6/7/2010 5:18:10 PM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 323
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 5:24:35 PM   
NewOCDaddy


Posts: 134
Joined: 1/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

It is pretty sad the some retirees must return to work- now that the stock market did not work out.






Over regulation of the private pension system is to thank for that

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 324
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 5:26:15 PM   
Dubbelganger


Posts: 200
Joined: 4/9/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Then again, it isnt good for the long side in gold, silver, oil or any other medium of exchange either. A bad economy is a bad economy regardless of the fiat currency you use...and gold/silver are no less "fiat" than paper. I.e. nothing has intrinsic value, only what people are willing to trade for it at any given time.
Bingo! That's what the Gold Bugs just cannot grasp: gold has no intrinsic value. It is only worth what people are willing to trade for it.

If, for instance, after the oil economy collapse, I am sitting on a hoard of painkillers and antibiotics, then there's no amount of gold I will want for my goodies. If someone comes along with, say, a stash of nails, or ammo, or other things which are of immediate use to me, then I will likely trade. But I will not give up my goods for gold, in the hopes that someone will come along with nails who is willing to trade for that gold. I simply won't take the risk.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 325
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 6:05:45 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubbelganger


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Then again, it isnt good for the long side in gold, silver, oil or any other medium of exchange either. A bad economy is a bad economy regardless of the fiat currency you use...and gold/silver are no less "fiat" than paper. I.e. nothing has intrinsic value, only what people are willing to trade for it at any given time.
Bingo! That's what the Gold Bugs just cannot grasp: gold has no intrinsic value. It is only worth what people are willing to trade for it.

If, for instance, after the oil economy collapse, I am sitting on a hoard of painkillers and antibiotics, then there's no amount of gold I will want for my goodies. If someone comes along with, say, a stash of nails, or ammo, or other things which are of immediate use to me, then I will likely trade. But I will not give up my goods for gold, in the hopes that someone will come along with nails who is willing to trade for that gold. I simply won't take the risk.



So this is what I am talking about.   You have things to barter.  Not paper pain killers, and paper nails.   So you are more prepared then people who are in stocks or paper money.

Plus you did this BEFORE the devaluation.

(in reply to Dubbelganger)
Profile   Post #: 326
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 6:14:12 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
U.S. Stocks Drop as S&P 500 Posts Worst Two Days in 14 Months http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNDdz9Nyy7cU&pos=2


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 327
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 7:29:53 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
<nm--waste of time>

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 6/7/2010 7:35:14 PM >

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 328
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 8:35:14 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubbelganger

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

No need to get testy. I was just suggesting some possible flaws in the way people think and talk about investments.

ETA I didn't say business was fictional. I said the value of a stock might be fictional.
Me, I always learned that Assets - Liabilities = Owner's Equity, OE being the net asset value of the company including retained earnings and receivables.

Now if there are 100 million shares of common stock outstanding, which are selling at $USD10 a share, that gives a market capitalization of $USD 1 billion. Yes?

But if the value of all assets - liabilities is only $100 million, then the stock is overvalued by a factor of 10, at that point in time, and without consideration of future earnings.

It's the future earning stream which gives the stock its additional value. If the market cap of a stock is wildly out of line with the earnings stream, given a particular set of economic conditions (x%GDP growth, y% unemployment, z% market share, aa% growth in market share, no new displacing tech innovations, and so on), then the price of a stock can indeed be "fictional". or irrational. I remember the gyrations my ex-wife went through trying to justify a P/E of 350 or so for eBay back in 98 when she was working on her Masters in Global E-Commerce.

Graham and Dodd are still relevant.

I do tend to agree that the stock markets function as a conduit for wealth from the investing classes to the ownership class.



Expectation of future earnings stream are estimates upon which a stock trades and is discounted in the present. Those expectatons are estimates based upon the conditions you suggested plus possible fabrication and/or short-sightedness of the CFO. I recall owning stock in a premium mortgage company as the subprime mortgage crisis was developing and listening to assurances that all our holdings were triple A rated. Well, it was all a crock as we learned. I sat through several earnings calls of different companies where the managers made rosey projections while we were going over the edge of the cliff. My point is that next year's earnings are often misguided, to be charitable, and so for all intents and purposes should be taken with a grain of salt. Or they are fabrications.

Another important point to note is that a stock's "value" is also driven by the popularity of the sector as well as the bullish/bearish condition of the Market in general. Sector rotation has been very common these past twenty years. Especially now with trading so popular in ETFs. Speculators and large Funds latch onto a Sector for whatever reason, often only because it is in bullish mode, that is because others are buying in that sector. So, they pile into the ETFs where it gets awfully crowded. The inevitable happens. they all try to get out the door at the same time. The current phrase is "the risk trade is being taken off." As a result your friends Graham and Dodd get stomped on. Intrinsic value is quite ephemeral if it really exists at all. There are just too many other forces that drive events in the Market I think.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Dubbelganger)
Profile   Post #: 329
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 8:45:13 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Central Banker's Dream - (n) the unlimited expansion of fiat currency and credit without the disastrous effects of price inflation or a loss of confidence in the paper currency itself. Why would the government want to suppress the price of gold and silver?
Gold and silver are real money. Gold and silver are competitors to paper fiat currencies the world over. Gold and silver values tend to inversely reflect the public's confidence in paper currency./sniphttp://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/05.10/explosion.html



On the other hand, the dollar was the currency of safe harbor during the recent Euro crisis, not gold. Also, gold was the reserve currency during the crash of '29 and the Depression of '31 as well as the bank panic of '31 and 1913 or whenever JP Morgan had to save the world. Gold reserves have never prevented bank panics.

Owning physical gold will do you little good in an apocolyptic world scenario. It only provides delusional confidence in the present time.

There is no such thing as "real money," imo.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 330
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 8:57:12 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Central Banker's Dream - (n) the unlimited expansion of fiat currency and credit without the disastrous effects of price inflation or a loss of confidence in the paper currency itself. Why would the government want to suppress the price of gold and silver?
Gold and silver are real money. Gold and silver are competitors to paper fiat currencies the world over. Gold and silver values tend to inversely reflect the public's confidence in paper currency./sniphttp://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/05.10/explosion.html



On the other hand, the dollar was the currency of safe harbor during the recent Euro crisis, not gold. Also, gold was the reserve currency during the crash of '29 and the Depression of '31 as well as the bank panic of '31 and 1913 or whenever JP Morgan had to save the world. Gold reserves have never prevented bank panics.

Owning physical gold will do you little good in an apocolyptic world scenario. It only provides delusional confidence in the present time.

There is no such thing as "real money," imo.


It is true that gold alone wont be enough.

You also need god.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 331
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 9:55:59 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
I have read the first page of responses tee, and decided to jump in before the flames started.

I have been a proponent of abolishing the stock market. I have good reason. You see, what a half decent investor will tell you is that stock prices do not fluctuate as much from the performance of the company, but what it's expected performance will be. What's more they are talking about the perfomnce of the stock in the first place, as this is their primary interest. They don't care if all the compamy's assets burn to the ground as long as the value and the dividends stay up. And this is only a half decent investor, a good one, if you can get them to talk, will tell you to follow the big money, just like at the racetrack. If I were willing, you could give me a million bucks and I will use about a hundred grand of it to educate myself more about the subject, and with the rest have maybe half a chance of parlaying that up. Most people don't even know these basic principles.

What's more, it is always a gamble of course. Just like in a high stakes poker game where those with more assets can buy the pot, those with the big money can manipulate the stock's performance much more easily than even the performance of the best run company. They could buy a shitload of stock, it will come available, they can do it fast enough that the company cannot use all that money all at once, so they will be stuck just collecting interest on it. They will have to lower dividends. Before the commoners can unload the stock, they sell, thereby flooding the market. Whether these practices are moral or not is not the point, they are perfectly legal.

Now if you personally know someone at a company and find that the stock is going to split or something, or that research has just hammered the bottom line, or whatever, if you make a windfall profit off of it you have better never even been in a car with anyone from that company even getting a speeding ticket. Even though the SEC looked the other way in 2001, they will not do that for you. There were some strange transactions right around the time then, don't hear much about that anymore do you ? Never been disproven, just swept under the rug. That is what money and power can do for you.

Now, there was a day way back when, when it worked more normally. Indeed if there was never a stock market things would be different. The way I see it the economy would differ greatly, it would be smaller in scale, but alot more stable. Businesses would diversify and grow on their own profits, and if outside investors were brought in, they would be right there at the board meetings. Right in their face so to speak. In reality all the things we wouldn't have, we wouldn't have needed.

But now we have so much vested interest in this mess there is only one solution, which is a near total collapse of the economy. You (and I) cannot really fathom what it would be like. I think the world would be alot better off. Many may disagree, but I think quite a few will change their tune after the real crash, which is still to come. But we are so deep in the hole now that really, just forstalling the inevitable doesn't matter anymore, even though that's pretty much what they did. If they can do it once more, kudos, because I don't think it is going to be all that easy.

What's more, many people with real money are holding quite a bit of gold and foreign currency, in fact fortunes can be made just doing that today, and have. Thus those so enabled are isolated from the failure of the US economy to some extent. Remember the object of any business venture, regardless of it's nature is to gain more than you lose. What would you do ? I would try to keep my ass afloat, no matter what.

Pulling out is no option. Pull out slow you lose, pull out fast you lose. Even if the bigwigs pull out, even the same day, there will be a scramble for something other than USDs, which is going to cost some people some money. But after having enjoyed la dolche vita for fifty years, and some sort of hedge, they don't care.

Some of the bigwigs are simply addicted to money. They grow more hungry every time they eat, like any addict. But there is another kind of bigwigs who are planning, very very intelligent, who think multi-generationally. They are think in terms of how much advantage they can leave their progeny. Both of these types run the stock market as effectively as players in a poker game who can dictate what cards everyone gets, just by instructing the dealer. The stock market is the perfect medium for this type of shit. And it is shit and it should have never been concieved.

What would have happened without it ? Maybe Henry Ford wouldn't have been able to pay the astronimical wage of a whole dollar a day right as fast as he did. Maybe there would be no General Motors, no ATT, no AIG (!), no alot of other things. Maybe our computers would still be running 8080 microprocessors, or even old TTL. But we would never miss it if we never had it. Maybe there would be no television networks, or modern media. Perhaps we would be somewhat isolated from the rest of the world, except fot those who can fly around and all that, but then there might not be supersonic transports, maybe not even huge airliners. Trade would be limited so we would have to be somewhat self sufficient, and there would be little in the way of resources or impetus to invade the rest of the world.

The more I think about it, the more appealing it gets. But to do it you would have to go back to the 1700s and write a Law into the Constitution. No other way because it would otherwise be an infringment. Then you have to figure out just how to word the Law. Then other countries might look down on us, like those who find Sharian Law repulsive. Perhaps then we would be under attack from other countries because their commercial interests would be negatively affected and the US would be seen as in need of a regime change. And then without the stock market, we would not likely have such a strong military and therefore be quite vulnerable to a real takeover by a foreign power.

How does that grab ya ?

T

(in reply to subtee)
Profile   Post #: 332
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/7/2010 11:54:16 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or



I have been a proponent of abolishing the stock market. I have good reason.
T



Ie you have good reason to destroy the ability to aggregate capital. Brilliant. It would be more than 1700s law that would be changed in that parallel world, we wouldnt be posting on the internet, we'd be getting ready to re-shoe the horses and plow the lower 40.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 333
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 12:20:10 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
That's probably right will. Absolutely. And the problem with that is ?

Think about it. Is a government comprised of people who don't understand why you can't take a bus from DC to Hawaii belong in charge of a government with the ability to destroy the world ? Do people who can't walk and chew gum, or successfully eat a potato chip belong in charge of nuclear weapons, and be able to go through the world and make sure only their friends are the only other ones with such weapons ? (which were invented here by the way)

Again, the advantages we enjoy now, no matter how impressive, the fact is if we never had them we would never miss them.

And if in fact we didn't breed greed with all that scrip, would science have been so slow ? The guy who invented the transistor worked for Bell labs. What if he was in his basement and invented the thing ?

I have thought this out to some extent, and there is one remaining fact no matter what the other ramifications. If we never had it we would never miss it. And what's more, for quite a few decades the US led and fed the technological revolution. In other words, if we didn't have it, very few if any others would. I don't know how much of a disadvantage we would suffer. We were the impetus for the cold war every bit as much as the USSR. They forced us to develop, we forced them to develop. What if that had never happened. What if the bomb was never invented. Even if WW2 still happened, Germany would've lost eventually anyway because of certain logistical conditions. Japan might not have been in it though, which would change the face of the world's economy. Even in hindsight it is hard to reverse predict, but can you really assert that things would not be so good ? In fact do you consider things good now ?

That's my point. I know what the stock market did, as well as the bond market and all that. It propelled us into this time. You think it's all good ? The piper will have to be paid, and the money with which to pay him is heading towards valuelessness. Is that good ? Will our military might save us, when we won't be able to afford to feed our soldiers and mercenaries ?

T

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 334
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 12:36:20 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

That's probably right will. Absolutely. And the problem with that is ?

Think about it. Is a government comprised of people who don't understand why you can't take a bus from DC to Hawaii belong in charge of a government with the ability to destroy the world ? Do people who can't walk and chew gum, or successfully eat a potato chip belong in charge of nuclear weapons, and be able to go through the world and make sure only their friends are the only other ones with such weapons ? (which were invented here by the way)

Again, the advantages we enjoy now, no matter how impressive, the fact is if we never had them we would never miss them.

And if in fact we didn't breed greed with all that scrip, would science have been so slow ? The guy who invented the transistor worked for Bell labs. What if he was in his basement and invented the thing ?

I have thought this out to some extent, and there is one remaining fact no matter what the other ramifications. If we never had it we would never miss it. And what's more, for quite a few decades the US led and fed the technological revolution. In other words, if we didn't have it, very few if any others would. I don't know how much of a disadvantage we would suffer. We were the impetus for the cold war every bit as much as the USSR. They forced us to develop, we forced them to develop. What if that had never happened. What if the bomb was never invented. Even if WW2 still happened, Germany would've lost eventually anyway because of certain logistical conditions. Japan might not have been in it though, which would change the face of the world's economy. Even in hindsight it is hard to reverse predict, but can you really assert that things would not be so good ? In fact do you consider things good now ?

That's my point. I know what the stock market did, as well as the bond market and all that. It propelled us into this time. You think it's all good ? The piper will have to be paid, and the money with which to pay him is heading towards valuelessness. Is that good ? Will our military might save us, when we won't be able to afford to feed our soldiers and mercenaries ?

T


All good? No. But a helluva lot better then the Luddite world you seem to find acceptable.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 335
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 1:41:06 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
So you believe that money leads to innovation. That creation is impelled by profit.

I can accept that, especially now. But without these factors in play, I think it would not be so. But I said I think. We can't experience that timeline so therefore this whole subject is opinion. How bad do you think it would be ?

T

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 336
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 2:14:31 AM   
Dubbelganger


Posts: 200
Joined: 4/9/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dubbelganger

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

No need to get testy. I was just suggesting some possible flaws in the way people think and talk about investments.

ETA I didn't say business was fictional. I said the value of a stock might be fictional.
Me, I always learned that Assets - Liabilities = Owner's Equity, OE being the net asset value of the company including retained earnings and receivables.

Now if there are 100 million shares of common stock outstanding, which are selling at $USD10 a share, that gives a market capitalization of $USD 1 billion. Yes?

But if the value of all assets - liabilities is only $100 million, then the stock is overvalued by a factor of 10, at that point in time, and without consideration of future earnings.

It's the future earning stream which gives the stock its additional value. If the market cap of a stock is wildly out of line with the earnings stream, given a particular set of economic conditions (x%GDP growth, y% unemployment, z% market share, aa% growth in market share, no new displacing tech innovations, and so on), then the price of a stock can indeed be "fictional". or irrational. I remember the gyrations my ex-wife went through trying to justify a P/E of 350 or so for eBay back in 98 when she was working on her Masters in Global E-Commerce.

Graham and Dodd are still relevant.

I do tend to agree that the stock markets function as a conduit for wealth from the investing classes to the ownership class.



Expectation of future earnings stream are estimates upon which a stock trades and is discounted in the present. Those expectatons are estimates based upon the conditions you suggested plus possible fabrication and/or short-sightedness of the CFO. I recall owning stock in a premium mortgage company as the subprime mortgage crisis was developing and listening to assurances that all our holdings were triple A rated. Well, it was all a crock as we learned. I sat through several earnings calls of different companies where the managers made rosey projections while we were going over the edge of the cliff. My point is that next year's earnings are often misguided, to be charitable, and so for all intents and purposes should be taken with a grain of salt. Or they are fabrications.

Another important point to note is that a stock's "value" is also driven by the popularity of the sector as well as the bullish/bearish condition of the Market in general. Sector rotation has been very common these past twenty years. Especially now with trading so popular in ETFs. Speculators and large Funds latch onto a Sector for whatever reason, often only because it is in bullish mode, that is because others are buying in that sector. So, they pile into the ETFs where it gets awfully crowded. The inevitable happens. they all try to get out the door at the same time. The current phrase is "the risk trade is being taken off." As a result your friends Graham and Dodd get stomped on. Intrinsic value is quite ephemeral if it really exists at all. There are just too many other forces that drive events in the Market I think.
I don't disagree with anything you are saying, VML. I'm sure you are aware as I am of the popularity of "Technical Analysis", wherein the future price of a stock is predicted based on not only what a particular stock has done in the past, but also what a particular sector has been, and is, doing.

I regard "Technical Analysis" in the same way that I regard Astrology. I mentioned Graham and Dodd because it is my opinion that, in the final analysis, the only rational way to value a company is by its fundamentals, irregardless of market fashions such as the popularity of a particular sector.

I scared myself out of day-trading about 13 or 14 years ago with a heart-flipping day of fun with Centennial Technologies. After that, I decided that I'd hold with companies with good fundamentals, and good growth prospects. I made a chunk on Cisco, and put that money into residential real estate, which I got mostly out of in 2006. I paid for my house, paid off all my debt, and don't have to work. I figure I did something right. No, I don't have a lot of cash flow, but the thing is: I don't have to work. I spent some time studying investing, had a few college classes on Financial Analysis, Managerial Accounting, and the like, and found an investment strategy which worked for my (more or less) risk-adverse personality.

The very same discussions I see here, on CM, today, I've seen time and time again over the years. I've seen the same gold-bug bullshit PaHUnk is hooked on, pushed every time there's a hiccup in economic growth. "Oh, but this time it's different!" they always say.

Actually, this time, I think some of the "theys" are right, but not for the reasons they think. Not only do I think we are seeing the collapse of liquidity worldwide, but I also think we are seeing the end of the "Oil Age", the era of exceedingly cheap energy which has fueled the growth of the modern world economy. But thst is a whole other topic.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 337
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 2:20:24 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

So you believe that money leads to innovation. That creation is impelled by profit.

I can accept that, especially now. But without these factors in play, I think it would not be so. But I said I think. We can't experience that timeline so therefore this whole subject is opinion. How bad do you think it would be ?

T


It is indisputable that creation is catalyzed by profit. There are dozens if not hundreds of social experiments throughout history that prove it.

How bad would it be? If mankind wasnt wiped out by disease life expectancy in the low 50s at best and an agrarian society.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 338
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 6:36:00 AM   
subtee


Posts: 5133
Joined: 7/26/2007
Status: offline
Thank you for posting, Term.

Silverback Hunky and his Goldmember are on my naughty list.

_____________________________

Don't believe everything you think...

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 339
RE: Imagine there's no stock market... - 6/8/2010 7:03:00 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Term,

I have the land and a good start on an agrarian existence. I would not want to be forced to live only that. People who romanticize it have never farmed a day in their lives. It is very hard work for very little return and with a host of risks. I only do it because (1) I enjoy working outside (2) I have the land anyway and like working with the trees and (3) fresh fruits and vegetables shot up 30% with the price of oil a few years back, adding incentive. Further, in the case of orchards, the "fruits of my labors" multiply over time. Veggie production starts from scratch each year.

Without a stock market, only the already wealthy would be able to invest in land or business ventures. It's why we had serfs and tenants for thousands of years. Only the rich would have the opportunities to participate in anything else. But today, I don't have to be rich to invest in businesses, bonds, and thus build my own capital. And I did.

The examples people are picking are extremes. Because intangibles are capitalized, people deny tangible assets. So make choices involving more tangible assets. People warn of extreme risks. So pick companies or funds in more stable, established businesses. Hot properties are manipulated at times, so the whole market is a house of cards--bullshit. Stay away from the volatile stocks.

Or stay away from the market entirely if you prefer. Mainly, when people rag on this incessantly, they are making excuses about why they "can't" save, not about the market, and need something other than themselves to blame. So the rich are keeping them down. That's it. Mystery solved.

There are also widespread and dearly held misconceptions about the economy, especially globally, and wanting to shut down international cooperation, ignoring our very healthy export market (nearly a trillion dollars of a $14 trillion economy) and the benefits we gain through other countries' comparative advantage in various goods (over a trillion dollars)--if we stopped this, we'd move from 3-5% growth now to -2-4% recession, and then you'd see unemployment really soar (yes, we could produce those imports, but not as effficiently) and inflation hit hard, the only weapon against it higher interest rates, further slowing the economy. We are holding too much debt. But we're also very strong fundamentally, and will continue to be.

But we can also invest in foreign stocks if you prefer (I have a small percentage in a global stock fund). More factors at play, but these all are opportunities, not the forces of evil out to destroy our way of life--which, by measure after measure, is much, much better than it was historically. We just have more time to bitch.



< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 6/8/2010 7:06:49 AM >

(in reply to subtee)
Profile   Post #: 340
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Imagine there's no stock market... Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.504