Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Bankers ?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Bankers ? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 9:59:32 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
Seeing as it is becoming common knowledge that the bankers are the ones pulling the strings in this world, and they seek to go from strength to strengh by influence, can the little people fight back against them, or at least protect themselves from bankers influence and control ?

I am talking what we as individuals can do aside from make plaintive noises at our political representatives to be lost in the conspiratoral silence of governmental control.

What would it take for bankers to start noticing the little people are on to them and not going to let them have their way?

Paid in cash, conduct business in cash, squirrel cash away under the floorboards perhaps ?

Could it be credit transfer is favourable because it allows governmental and there taxation access to one's earnings ?


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 10:14:34 AM   
DCWoody


Posts: 1401
Joined: 10/27/2006
Status: offline
Ah yes, 'the bankers'. They're all 8 feet tall, and have green eyes.

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 10:23:42 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Seeing as it is becoming common knowledge that the bankers are the ones pulling the strings in this world, and they seek to go from strength to strengh by influence, can the little people fight back against them, or at least protect themselves from bankers influence and control ?

I am talking what we as individuals can do aside from make plaintive noises at our political representatives to be lost in the conspiratoral silence of governmental control.

What would it take for bankers to start noticing the little people are on to them and not going to let them have their way?

Paid in cash, conduct business in cash, squirrel cash away under the floorboards perhaps ?

Could it be credit transfer is favourable because it allows governmental and there taxation access to one's earnings ?




Aneirin, ask Obama about "The Bankers". They went to the head of the line to grab all that TARP money didn't they?
And over the weekend we findout that The Monhegan Sun Casino in Conneticut got $52 Million in "stimulous funds" when they made $1 Billion dollars last year thank you very much Sen. Christopher Dodd!
As I've said here before, this whole charade has nothing to do with "stimulating the economy" and *everything* to do with keeping wealthy people wealthy!
The banks, any bank shouldn't be exzempt from the bankruptcy laws.
Obama is throwing good money after bad and the banks will make the same misstakes

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 10:33:29 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
Yes, I know, and it is much the same here and I would hazard a guess at the world over, but what I was asking is what we as individuals can do to limit or remove their influence on us as individuals. Somehow I really don't think the politicians are much use here, so forget calling on them they are just as much in the gravy train as the bankers.

_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 10:48:51 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
vote with your feet.

anyone that feeds the beast, enables that beast.

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 10:52:43 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Yes, I know, and it is much the same here and I would hazard a guess at the world over, but what I was asking is what we as individuals can do to limit or remove their influence on us as individuals. Somehow I really don't think the politicians are much use here, so forget calling on them they are just as much in the gravy train as the bankers.


Aneirin, yes, one thing we *can* do is to vote out all incumbents in office!
And yes, use as much cash as possable.
And if you're on a jury on a bank robbery case vote "NOT GUILTY!"

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 6/21/2010 10:53:38 AM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 12:23:10 PM   
Fellow


Posts: 1486
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
No, there is not much "small people" can do at this point to change the system. To influence the system by voting one way or another is pure illusion; it will not change anything in near future. Popular financial commentator Max Kaiser made a comment that the free market capitalism is finished and that we have entered the period of financial terrorism and economic wars. As you mention, on personal level everybody can (and should) take  measures to protect themselves. It means avoiding debt, keeping their savings in real hard assets. If everybody would try do it, the system would be finished. It is not the case, of course. Most people do not make changes to their behavior, most often they react when it is too late.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 12:27:54 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Short of tracking down a few bank CEOs, torturing their children to death in front of them and then beheading the wankers and nailing their heads to the doors of their bank's head office?
Nish.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 5:27:42 PM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
At least one guy fought back ;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/975012.stm

and eventually won despite threats from the law.


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 5:30:04 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Switch to a credit union.

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 8:33:19 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250



Aneirin, ask Obama about "The Bankers". They went to the head of the line to grab all that TARP money didn't they?
And over the weekend we findout that The Monhegan Sun Casino in Conneticut got $52 Million in "stimulous funds" when they made $1 Billion dollars last year thank you very much Sen. Christopher Dodd!
As I've said here before, this whole charade has nothing to do with "stimulating the economy" and *everything* to do with keeping wealthy people wealthy!
The banks, any bank shouldn't be exzempt from the bankruptcy laws.
Obama is throwing good money after bad and the banks will make the same misstakes


Ah, TARP was a Bush Administration construction, Popeye. Remember, the sky was falling?

The banks aren't making mistakes. They have devised securitized instruments that are so mathematically complex to be beyond understanding. I am referring to RMBS, CDOs, synthetic CDOs that have no real mortgages or loans as foundation, and a $45 Trillion dollar unregulated market in default swaps. I try not to believe in conspiracy theory but I keep reading about this shadow banking system that is leveraged beyond belief. I would not be so confident the house of cards has finished collapsing. Sheesh.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 8:37:17 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

No, there is not much "small people" can do at this point to change the system. To influence the system by voting one way or another is pure illusion; it will not change anything in near future. Popular financial commentator Max Kaiser made a comment that the free market capitalism is finished and that we have entered the period of financial terrorism and economic wars. As you mention, on personal level everybody can (and should) takeĀ  measures to protect themselves. It means avoiding debt, keeping their savings in real hard assets. If everybody would try do it, the system would be finished. It is not the case, of course. Most people do not make changes to their behavior, most often they react when it is too late.


I worry as you do but yanno "most people" are living pay check to pay check to unemployment check. But I agree, the financial system is a monster which could devour us.


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Bankers ? - 6/21/2010 9:23:06 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML



Ah, TARP was a Bush Administration construction, Popeye. Remember, the sky was falling?



Short memory eh?

Let me remind you.

House vote:

--------------Yeas Nays
Democratic 172 --63
Republican 91 ---108
Independent
TOTALS 263 171


Senate vote:

--------------Yeas Nays
Democratic 40 --9
Republican 33 ---15
Independent 1---1
TOTALS 74 25

The bill was written in Democrat controlled committees in both houses using advisors that are now senior in Blowboy's staff. Not even close to a Bush construction.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 6/21/2010 9:41:34 PM >

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Bankers ? - 6/22/2010 2:21:11 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

Well if it's any consolation I'll be sticking it up their ass for alot more than a load of manure.

T

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Bankers ? - 6/22/2010 5:10:55 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Seeing as it is becoming common knowledge that the bankers are the ones pulling the strings in this world, and they seek to go from strength to strengh by influence, can the little people fight back against them, or at least protect themselves from bankers influence and control ?

I am talking what we as individuals can do aside from make plaintive noises at our political representatives to be lost in the conspiratoral silence of governmental control.

What would it take for bankers to start noticing the little people are on to them and not going to let them have their way?

Paid in cash, conduct business in cash, squirrel cash away under the floorboards perhaps ?

Could it be credit transfer is favourable because it allows governmental and there taxation access to one's earnings ?



I think all your ideas have merit and are parts of what we all can do to limit the exposure to banks. Our greed led us into their hands and our lack of it will lead us out of them. We need to be happy with 2% growth on our money and not always look for 10%. We should look at home ownership as something that will last and not something to be flipped for a profit within months. We need to pay with cash, barter, do anything to keep away from using credit. I think it will lead to quieter lives but we will all be better off for the actions.

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Bankers ? - 6/22/2010 6:19:58 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
That is how I look at property ownership, it is owned, and therefore mine, something I have managed to get in this life for my own security and comfort. I buy vehicles, they last me ten years or more, as other machines I own, I look after them and treat them as if they will last a life time given the correct care and maintenance. My own home I would like, to feed my need for security, a home where I can return to which is mine to live in.

I despise the buy, throw money at it and sell for profit mentality when it comes to houses, as what it does is move the house prices higher and further away from the poor and I despise the fact that homes are a commodity to make quick profit on.

To me, a house is a home and there security.

I have personally vowed never to get a mortgage and enslave myself to the banks and their whims, it is why I rent accomodation, for I will purchase my own home someday, when the time is right and it will be paid for by what I have, like I said elsewhere,  a trailer will do and that hopefully on my own piece of land bought and paid for by me.


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Bankers ? - 6/22/2010 7:01:36 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
DYB, your pic displays attitude but your post displays a brain.

I think the problem here is that we need to go much further than just using cash. Most can agree that money in the bank is one of the worst things to have. You get 2%, they have the shell of the FDIC etc. to bail them out when they use your capital for high risk investments. In that way they can reap the profits of success and be isolated at least somewhat from the consequences of failure. Nice work if you can get it, but it is nothing but gambling really. They are in a position to do it, why aren't we ?

A couple of friends of mine almost started a new bank a while ago. Their initial capitalisation would've been about two million, which was enough. I don't know exactly why they didn't but the one would be partner was the absolute best lawyer I have ever met. They ended up sticking the money in real estate and rode the bubble up for some time.

But to just keep the money in a private place is not the best solution. One guy had many thousands of dollars in quarters, he said go ahead and take it. It weighed a fucking ton at least. Fireproof as well. These were not stupid people.

But big stockpiles of money are not the best answer, because it's value is influenced unduly. It's better to have tangible assets. Anyone with money now should be buying houses in this market. Left and right, as many as they can afford. What is surprising to me is that there is not an explosion in the rental market, with all these foreclosures I expected one. But it's true that in certain areas of the country a house payment would be cheaper than rent. It's just that now fewer people have the requisite credit rating.

Unfortunately the way I see it, forget land contract. That is by definition renting to lose. If I sell you a house I want all my money now. That's what makes it worth it to sell a house, rather than monthly payments. Then you take that money and get rid of it, put it into something useful. Otherwise you might as well rent the joint out. That lump sum is purchasing power, it's just a matter of what to purchase. If you can flip a couple of houses great, but that is more easily said than done in this market. Right now it is a buyer's market such as we have never seen. You have to be able to afford to sit on the property for some time, years actually. And in the end, your gains might just be enough to offset inflation. So it's really lose or break even. But it is still better to break even.

But we are getting into a time in history when basic necessities are going to come into play - their availability and price. We got a house for sale. You can have it for sixty grand or so. We paid seventy five and stuck about ten into it. But right now the purchasing power outweighs the other factors. Those other factors of course include liabilities, even though noone lives there we have taxes, insurance and utilities.

What would we do with the money ? Well perhaps another house but only if we can pretty much steal it. Other options include land out in the stix, deisel generators, solar panels, all kinds of other things. Water - perhaps dig wells on the other properties. Big tanks of propane, and the parts to rejet the furnaces. Then some absorption based refrigerators or freezers. Older car and plenty of spare parts. Non perishable foods. Mineral supplements. All that, it's all worth more than money and you don't have to take my word for it.

Just think of inflation, which is actually deflation of the currency if you look at it from the other side. The prices of all these things will go up, of that there is no doubt. But once you have the goods, you have the value. Locked in. It is crucial to understand this. The value of things does not change, it is actually the value of the money that changes.

Getting out of the banks is easy, getting out of money is not. First of all no matter what there will be a certain overhead which requies FRNs. Utility bills, propery taxes, plates for your car(s), many other things. You can barter for damnear anything else, but there are those certain things.

But if we only feed the beast enough to survive, rather than to thrive, I think we will do alot better. There are just some things. For example you are now reading my highly whatevered post on a website. What happens if your monitor takes a shit right now ? Do you get offline until someone wants to trade you a working monitor for a bunch of junk you have ? No, you have to dig up about a hundred bucks and feed the monster. No choice. But most of this wasted money is your choice.

You can now buy a generator that can feed your house for 5-8 years without fuel. The life is finite. Once you start it you get that much time, and it'll run your electric furnace, stoves and AC, and even charge your electric cars. But it cost upwards of a million dollars, your electric bill would never be that high. It comes out to about ten grand a month.

Getting off the grid has been a high priority for those who would recuse themselves from the money game. But as in alot of things, it is simply not practical.

The politicians and PTB are not the only ones who would like to maintain the status quo. It is also us. We The People. None of us want to go back to herding sheep, wearing mocassins and wielding a staff. We want our Cadillac, internet and cable. We want our phones and who knows, ipods ? We want these things otherwise we wouldn't have spent the money on them.

In the end we can win, but it is going to take some sacrifice to do it.

T

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Bankers ? - 6/22/2010 10:58:13 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

DYB, your pic displays attitude but your post displays a brain.

I think the problem here is that we need to go much further than just using cash. Most can agree that money in the bank is one of the worst things to have. You get 2%, they have the shell of the FDIC etc. to bail them out when they use your capital for high risk investments. In that way they can reap the profits of success and be isolated at least somewhat from the consequences of failure. Nice work if you can get it, but it is nothing but gambling really. They are in a position to do it, why aren't we ?

A couple of friends of mine almost started a new bank a while ago. Their initial capitalisation would've been about two million, which was enough. I don't know exactly why they didn't but the one would be partner was the absolute best lawyer I have ever met. They ended up sticking the money in real estate and rode the bubble up for some time.

But to just keep the money in a private place is not the best solution. One guy had many thousands of dollars in quarters, he said go ahead and take it. It weighed a fucking ton at least. Fireproof as well. These were not stupid people.

But big stockpiles of money are not the best answer, because it's value is influenced unduly. It's better to have tangible assets. Anyone with money now should be buying houses in this market. Left and right, as many as they can afford. What is surprising to me is that there is not an explosion in the rental market, with all these foreclosures I expected one. But it's true that in certain areas of the country a house payment would be cheaper than rent. It's just that now fewer people have the requisite credit rating.

Unfortunately the way I see it, forget land contract. That is by definition renting to lose. If I sell you a house I want all my money now. That's what makes it worth it to sell a house, rather than monthly payments. Then you take that money and get rid of it, put it into something useful. Otherwise you might as well rent the joint out. That lump sum is purchasing power, it's just a matter of what to purchase. If you can flip a couple of houses great, but that is more easily said than done in this market. Right now it is a buyer's market such as we have never seen. You have to be able to afford to sit on the property for some time, years actually. And in the end, your gains might just be enough to offset inflation. So it's really lose or break even. But it is still better to break even.

But we are getting into a time in history when basic necessities are going to come into play - their availability and price. We got a house for sale. You can have it for sixty grand or so. We paid seventy five and stuck about ten into it. But right now the purchasing power outweighs the other factors. Those other factors of course include liabilities, even though noone lives there we have taxes, insurance and utilities.

What would we do with the money ? Well perhaps another house but only if we can pretty much steal it. Other options include land out in the stix, deisel generators, solar panels, all kinds of other things. Water - perhaps dig wells on the other properties. Big tanks of propane, and the parts to rejet the furnaces. Then some absorption based refrigerators or freezers. Older car and plenty of spare parts. Non perishable foods. Mineral supplements. All that, it's all worth more than money and you don't have to take my word for it.

Just think of inflation, which is actually deflation of the currency if you look at it from the other side. The prices of all these things will go up, of that there is no doubt. But once you have the goods, you have the value. Locked in. It is crucial to understand this. The value of things does not change, it is actually the value of the money that changes.

Getting out of the banks is easy, getting out of money is not. First of all no matter what there will be a certain overhead which requies FRNs. Utility bills, propery taxes, plates for your car(s), many other things. You can barter for damnear anything else, but there are those certain things.

But if we only feed the beast enough to survive, rather than to thrive, I think we will do alot better. There are just some things. For example you are now reading my highly whatevered post on a website. What happens if your monitor takes a shit right now ? Do you get offline until someone wants to trade you a working monitor for a bunch of junk you have ? No, you have to dig up about a hundred bucks and feed the monster. No choice. But most of this wasted money is your choice.

You can now buy a generator that can feed your house for 5-8 years without fuel. The life is finite. Once you start it you get that much time, and it'll run your electric furnace, stoves and AC, and even charge your electric cars. But it cost upwards of a million dollars, your electric bill would never be that high. It comes out to about ten grand a month.

Getting off the grid has been a high priority for those who would recuse themselves from the money game. But as in alot of things, it is simply not practical.

The politicians and PTB are not the only ones who would like to maintain the status quo. It is also us. We The People. None of us want to go back to herding sheep, wearing mocassins and wielding a staff. We want our Cadillac, internet and cable. We want our phones and who knows, ipods ? We want these things otherwise we wouldn't have spent the money on them.

In the end we can win, but it is going to take some sacrifice to do it.

T


I agree with most of what you said. I guess I think it would be a great day when everyone walked into any and every store for and just used cash, no credit. Somehow, at that point we would have won the power back. The financial establishment would be throwing credit scores out of the window and themselves along with them just to get people to borrow.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Bankers ? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.205