RE: Men in my panties.

RE: Men in my panties. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

PeonForHer -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 4:15:19 PM)
Rochsub can send his pic in first. It was his idea. I know that this might be a wild stab in the dark . . . but I wonder if, by some small chance, Otters might have a pic of himself, too?

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 4:24:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer Rochsub can send his pic in first. It was his idea. I know that this might be a wild stab in the dark . . . but I wonder if, by some small chance, Otters might have a pic of himself, too? Speaking of which, Rochsub never did get in on that pit-shot competition... hinthinthinthint

laurell3 -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 4:28:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009 quote: ORIGINAL: SirsJewel Cannot say seeing a man in panties would turn me on That's because you've never seen me in panties. [:D] Pics or it didn't happen...need my email address? [8D]

BKSir -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 4:32:32 PM)
Okay, that's just a no. You had your thread. Mod cleanup aisle 3 please?

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:14:31 PM)
By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker.

Elisabella -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:17:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus Is it humiliating to be a woman? I don't think so. So, why is it "humiliating" to wear women's underwear? That's just misogyny, in my book. It's not humiliating for a woman to be a woman, just like it's not humiliating for a dog to be a dog, but puppy play is humiliating too. The point is not that being a woman is a bad thing but rather that you're being forced to imitate something that you're not.

BKSir -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:23:03 PM)
EDIT: Please ignore this post. Next one please. Move along, nothing to see here.

BKSir -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:25:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker. Thank you Miss Alpha for both. [:)] I actually was! That's awesome! Is it okay to hug admins here? I hope so. HUG I'm now officially creepy! Edit because not only am I creepy, I don't know how to click the right button. Now, back to your regularly scheduled thread. I like the way you described that Elisabella. Pretty much what I was thinking in my head, but wasn't sure how to say.

OttersSwim -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:29:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer Rochsub can send his pic in first. It was his idea. I know that this might be a wild stab in the dark . . . but I wonder if, by some small chance, Otters might have a pic of himself, too? In panties? ...oh no no...I would never go in for that sort of thing P...[;)]

submissivemale22 -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:31:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker. This is absurd. Why am i being selectively persecuted by the moderators on this forum? Nothing in my content is incongruent with the stated rules of this forum. This is an adult forum and as such there should be increased latitude extended to users- not less. ps- for your edification, the proper term (provided you are female) is "administratrix", not "administrator."

BKSir -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:32:36 PM)
Where do I sign up to sit on the judging panel for this? Uh... not that I would want to, I'm just... curious. Yeah, that's it. [sm=angel.gif]

PeonForHer -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:32:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus Is it humiliating to be a woman? I don't think so. So, why is it "humiliating" to wear women's underwear? That's just misogyny, in my book. It's not humiliating for a woman to be a woman, just like it's not humiliating for a dog to be a dog, but puppy play is humiliating too. The point is not that being a woman is a bad thing but rather that you're being forced to imitate something that you're not. Hmmm. I do think there might be something in that. I have dangly bits; women don't. Therefore, if I'm dressed as a woman there's the suggestion that my dangly bits are redundant. I've been symbolically emasculated - that's the key thing for the buzz - and maybe being 'feminised' in the process is only incidental.

Jeffff -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:37:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: submissivemale22 quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker. This is absurd. Why am i being selectively persecuted by the moderators on this forum? Nothing in my content is incongruent with the stated rules of this forum. This is an adult forum and as such there should be increased latitude extended to users- not less. ps- for your edification, the proper term (provided you are female) is "administratrix", not "administrator." LOL... I am soooo gonna miss you Try in in caps!

LadyPact -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:37:48 PM)
OK. BK got a request, I have one, too! MP is home. Somebody please reinstate the thread that was pulled. I know he would laugh his ass off. The world should have more comedy, not less of it.

laurell3 -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:43:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: submissivemale22 quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker. This is absurd. Why am i being selectively persecuted by the moderators on this forum? Nothing in my content is incongruent with the stated rules of this forum. This is an adult forum and as such there should be increased latitude extended to users- not less. ps- for your edification, the proper term (provided you are female) is "administratrix", not "administrator." You're not getting singled out, we all get moderated when we make statements wholesale discounting anyone else's kink. It's in the rules for the forum. Read it before you assume conspiracy.

submissivemale22 -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:47:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 quote: ORIGINAL: submissivemale22 quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker. This is absurd. Why am i being selectively persecuted by the moderators on this forum? Nothing in my content is incongruent with the stated rules of this forum. This is an adult forum and as such there should be increased latitude extended to users- not less. ps- for your edification, the proper term (provided you are female) is "administratrix", not "administrator." You're not getting singled out, we all get moderated when we make statements wholesale discounting anyone else's kink. It's in the rules for the forum. Read it before you assume conspiracy. and yet those ridiculing the poor goreans posted with impunity.

laurell3 -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:49:00 PM)
That's an idiotic defense....it's like saying everyone else speeds officer...grow up...there are rules to everything in life, it's not a conspiracy you have to follow them.

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:54:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: submissivemale22 quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha By the way BK, you are welcome...lol I saw your request before the other. Let me know if you were not sincere and in fact to not want that moniker. This is absurd. Why am i being selectively persecuted by the moderators on this forum? Nothing in my content is incongruent with the stated rules of this forum. This is an adult forum and as such there should be increased latitude extended to users- not less. ps- for your edification, the proper term (provided you are female) is "administratrix", not "administrator." You are not being selectively persecuted. We have better things to do than to pick on you. You were given an answer not once, but twice by one of My moderators, with little links you could click, One would think that someone with the awesome education you claim to have could have understood them. If you have any trouble with any of the terms, I will be happy to help you decipher any concepts or rules you have particular trouble understanding. I am female, and appreciate your grammatical help. As a "girl", your game has somehow failed and I would suggest if you have any other questions you either email Me or Support (hint, take your cursor, hover it over this link http://www.collarme.com/personals/support.htm and click your left button once). If you continue this matter on the boards as you appear to desire to do, you will lose all chances at being the aspiring attention whore that you appear to be, because you will be under moderation). Any questions?

submissivemale22 -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:54:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 That's an idiotic defense....it's like saying everyone else speeds officer...grow up...there are rules to everything in life, it's not a conspiracy you have to follow them. seriously? look again at the specific claim i was refuting and i suspect you would not call it idiotic.

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: Men in my panties. (6/23/2010 5:56:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact OK. BK got a request, I have one, too! MP is home. Somebody please reinstate the thread that was pulled. I know he would laugh his ass off. The world should have more comedy, not less of it. I will send it to you privately, will that work?

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

5.712891E-02