Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 4:16:03 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Moon,

You must remember we have some posters here who are jammed so far right, they think the middle is the left.


A good point, well made.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 4:22:35 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

I didnt say "identical", I said "as far left". Still waiting for your examples of the differences.


"Every bit as far left" seems to mean the same as identical to me. You have a habit of making stupid comments then going off track when challenged. I find it strange that two English guys had to educate you on McCarthy.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 4:25:52 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

in response to whether she wrote a memo that led to distortions in the reporting of a scientific study on partial birth abortion.

Why did she try to duck repeated questioning about whether she wrote it?
Is she really so slow on her feet that she thought "Its in my handwriting" would end the issue?

This is only one of several evasive answers, particularly damning because she criticized prior nominees for being vacuous in their answers.

Obv this doesnt change the fact that she will be nominated. What it does do is make it clear that she was nominated because she is a far left idealogue that fits Obama's vision and need for an activist judge. The only saving grace for the most ridiculous nomination since Harriet Miers is that she is replacing another liberal. Hopefully Obama never gets a chance to change the balance of the Court.


I agree...We need corporations buying elections.

Poor wilbur.

_____________________________



(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 4:27:08 PM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
OMG DomKen and I agree on something quick duck and cover we're a full two years ahead of the Mayan schedule. LOL

Wait I'll set the world right again and post something he'll disagree with by way of solution.
Shrink the size of the government and you could eliminate several of those appointments. LOL

Shrink or not the idea that some of these jobs are presidential appointments makes them frighteningly partisan both directions

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 4:28:31 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
there are no republicans out here on CM...Oh no!!! Only centrists and the financially responsible. Idiots.

_____________________________



(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 4:43:02 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer

OMG DomKen and I agree on something quick duck and cover we're a full two years ahead of the Mayan schedule. LOL

Wait I'll set the world right again and post something he'll disagree with by way of solution.
Shrink the size of the government and you could eliminate several of those appointments. LOL

Shrink or not the idea that some of these jobs are presidential appointments makes them frighteningly partisan both directions

You could. I've always thought the Office of National Drug Control Policy (The so called Drug Czar) was completely redundant and existed strictly for political reasons.

I've long been in favor of shrinking the government. The problem is I want to shrink the stuff that costs us money not the stuff conservatives want to cut.

For instance The US Army and USAF could be drastically reduced in size and equipment acquisition and unit organization could be oriented to small units capable of independent operations with emphasis on urban settings. We have absolutely no need for 9000+ Abrams tanks. As a amtter of fact the USAF should be merged back into the US Army. The reduction in overhead and redundacy would produce many billions in savings.

The Department of Homeland Security could be completely eliminated and the constituent parts returned to the departments from whence they came. Some FBI/CIA/NSA/etc. joint operations center could achieve the departments goals without adding an entire cabinent department.

Now that stuff would save a whole lot of money but it doesn't make the libertarians and cons hearts flutter like slashing things like EPA does. The difference is my suggestion does us no harm while eliminating EPA, FDA or DoEnergy would reduce oversight of industries that have proven they cannot be trusted.

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 5:54:17 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


. They are using archaic rules to hold up other appointments... such as the head of homeland security....


Yeah, much worse than the Democrats changing traditional rules to block Bush's appointments.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 5:55:43 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead



Apart from the one about nationalism I posted



Didnt see it. what about "nationalism"?


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 5:58:45 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Both sides have taken to holding up appointments as a means to gum up the ability of the other side to make things happen on their agendas.


Democrats usually pussied out from obstructing...

If you look at how the use of the filibuster has escalated since Obama took office, it is shameful


ORLY. Do you know the definition of a a filibuster? Do you know how many there were in 2009?

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 5:59:06 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


. They are using archaic rules to hold up other appointments... such as the head of homeland security....


Yeah, much worse than the Democrats changing traditional rules to block Bush's appointments.


1) do two wrongs make a right?

2) Were there ever high level appointments like Director of Homeland Security that democrats blocked...this has been for MONTHS. This is a national security issue, and the people's business

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/01/gop_reportedly_holding_up_home.html

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:01:10 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Both sides have taken to holding up appointments as a means to gum up the ability of the other side to make things happen on their agendas.


Democrats usually pussied out from obstructing...

If you look at how the use of the filibuster has escalated since Obama took office, it is shameful


ORLY. Do you know the definition of a a filibuster? Do you know how many there were in 2009?


Here you are oh dense one


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/record-breaking-senate-conservatives-use-filibuster-for-62nd-time-in-this-session-of-congress-58789162.html


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:02:17 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

I didnt say "identical", I said "as far left". Still waiting for your examples of the differences.


"Every bit as far left" seems to mean the same as identical to me. You haveĀ a habit of making stupid comments then going off track when challenged. I find it strange that two English guys had to educate you on McCarthy.


They were wrong about McCarthy, so no education there.

As far as them seeming identical to you, you apparently have trouble with English, not me. A simple example should suffice. If Chomsky has x far left positions and x centrist positions, and Obama has exactly the opposite positions, then Obama is every bit as far left, yet not one position is identical.

Did you graduate middle school?

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:04:22 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

I'm not going to take my time to look up what you post if you can't be bothered to add a link to your own thread, nor am I going to take your word for what was said without the actual comments.



I posted a link in my 1st post.The 2nd post of the thread.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:18:40 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


1) Do two wrongs make a right?

2) Were there ever high level appointments like Director of Homeland Security that democrats blocked...this has been for MONTHS. This is a national security issue, and the people's business

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/01/gop_reportedly_holding_up_home.html



1) No. However you display a lack of objectivity when you only mention the current one. If you think pointing that out is attempting to make either of them "right" then you need some lessons in logic.

2) 180 nominations blocked at one point, including head of the FEC. If you dont think enforcing election law is a national security issue, then look at the countries where it isnt enforced.

Director of Homeland Security? I assume you mean Secretary, since there is no "Director". And thats Napolitano. So exactly who is being blocked?

And why dont you answer my previous question...what is a filibuster and how many were there in 2009?

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:28:13 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

1) No. However you display a lack of objectivity when you only mention the current one. If you think pointing that out is attempting to make either of them "right" then you need some lessons in logic.


I am not a democrat and I do not approve of what they are doing with their power


1
quote:

80 nominations blocked at one point, including head of the FEC. If you dont think enforcing election law is a national security issue, then look at the countries where it isnt enforced
.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/05/AR2010020502098.html



quote:

Director of Homeland Security? I assume you mean Secretary, since there is no "Director". And thats Napolitano. So exactly who is being blocked?


Actually I meant the TSA, which is important for our national security.... here is a link


http://www.thesunnews.com/2010/06/25/1553428/obama-finally-has-success-with.html



_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:32:22 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Actually I meant the TSA, which is important for our national security....






I dont need a link, Im not dependent on them like so many here.

TSA is very important for our national security, which is why making sure Southers was never head of it was critical. The man is an incompetent who was named as payback for Obamas union support. Like so many other Obama's shortsighted appointees, he should have had Southers vetted before he embarassed himself once again.

At least Pistole has some credibility. Mission accomplished.

Still stuck on that filibuster question, eh?

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 6/30/2010 6:35:15 PM >

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:35:58 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

I dont need a link, Im not dependent on them like so many here.

TSA is very important for our national security, which is why making sure Southers is never head of it is critical. The man is an incompetent who was named as payback for Obamas union support. Like so many other Obama's shortsighted appointees, he should have had Southers vetted before he embarassed himself once again.

Still stuck on that filibuster question, eh?


I gave you a link supporting my position about republican filibustering 62 times.... and yet you want to go back to eighth grade and want me to prove I know what a filibuster is. I am not going to play your elementary school game... if you want to start an American Political Thread 101, feel free, but I am not going to dignify that bullshit with a response...


Edited to add, it is fairly obvious you do not rely on information other than what you hear on Fox News...




< Message edited by juliaoceania -- 6/30/2010 6:37:22 PM >


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:37:54 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

I dont need a link, Im not dependent on them like so many here.

TSA is very important for our national security, which is why making sure Southers is never head of it is critical. The man is an incompetent who was named as payback for Obamas union support. Like so many other Obama's shortsighted appointees, he should have had Southers vetted before he embarassed himself once again.

Still stuck on that filibuster question, eh?


I gave you a link supporting my position about republican filibustering 62 times.... and yet you want to go back to eighth grade and want me to prove I know what a filibuster is. I am not going to play your elementary school game... if you want to start an American Political Thread 101, feel free, but I am not going to dignify that bullshit with a response...





Your link is nonsene if it says there were 62 filibusters. The answer is none, not a single one.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:41:42 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-us-senate-rollcall-spending,0,7853114.story

The 57-41 roll call Thursday by which Senate Democrats failed to break a Republican filibuster blocking a bill to continue weekly jobless benefits for long-term unemployed workers and provide new aid to state governments. Democrats needed 60 votes to stop the GOP filibuster.

A "yes" vote is a vote in favor of proceeding to the bill.

Voting yes were 55 Democrats, 0 Republicans and 2 independents.

This is just from today... you are really uninformed




< Message edited by juliaoceania -- 6/30/2010 6:42:01 PM >


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says - 6/30/2010 6:49:59 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-us-senate-rollcall-spending,0,7853114.story

The 57-41 roll call Thursday by which Senate Democrats failed to break a Republican filibuster blocking a bill to continue weekly jobless benefits for long-term unemployed workers and provide new aid to state governments. Democrats needed 60 votes to stop the GOP filibuster.

A "yes" vote is a vote in favor of proceeding to the bill.

Voting yes were 55 Democrats, 0 Republicans and 2 independents.

This is just from today... you are really uninformed





No, you apparently dont realize we arent in 2009 anymore. You also apparently dont realize that an action to block cloture is not the sole determinant of what is or isnt a filibuster. You can quote inaccurate articles all you like, it doesnt change the meanings of words.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 6/30/2010 6:50:44 PM >

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Its in my handwriting" Kagan says Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.329