Racial Bias At The Justice Department

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

Racial Bias At The Justice Department

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Racial Bias At The Justice Department

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 11:30:51 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

I'm sure Keith Olbermann and Chris Mathews were all over this one - Democrat racists are running the country:

quote:

Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case

In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims.

J. Christian Adams, testifying Tuesday before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, said that "over and over and over again," the department showed "hostility" toward those cases. He described the Black Panther case as one example of that -- he defended the legitimacy of the suit and said his "blood boiled" when he heard a Justice official claim the case wasn't solid.

"It is false," Adams said of the claim.

"We abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens," he later testified.

The department abandoned the New Black Panther case last year. It stemmed from an incident on Election Day in 2008 in Philadelphia, where members of the party were videotaped in front of a polling place, dressed in military-style uniforms and allegedly hurling racial slurs while one brandished a night stick.

The Bush Justice Department brought the first case against three members of the group, accusing them in a civil complaint of violating the Voter Rights Act. The Obama administration initially pursued the case, winning a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members did not appear in court. But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a "deadly weapon" near a polling place until 2012.

Full article at:
Http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/06/ex-official-accuses-justice-department-racial-bias-black-panther-case/

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 11:52:28 AM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 11:55:38 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Fox entertainment? This is the political section. belongs in stupidity or humor.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:12:34 PM

willbeurdaddy

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.

What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:40:58 PM

Jack45

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline

Under questioning, Attorney Gen. Holder was surprisingly forthright in admitting that the hate bill is not intended to protect everyone, or even the majority. He said only historically oppressed minorities were to benefit. This means Jews, blacks, homosexuals, women, etc. Holder made it clear that if a white Christian male, including a serviceman or police officer, was the victim of a violent hate crime by any minority he would have to find redress from traditional law. He could not avail himself of the triple penalties and rapid government/justice system response given a protected minority.
YouTube - Eric Holder Admits No Equality Under Hate Crimes Bill

These catastrophic admissions were extracted by Senators Sessions (R-AL) and Coburn (R-OK). The webcast of the hearings is here (on right) and the relevant passages are 58.30-61 minutes (Sessions) and 71.30-5 minutes (Coburn).

Film can indeed tell more than the printed word. Anyone who reviews the comments and deliveries by Democratic Senators Feinstein(CA), Cardin (MD)and Schumer (NY)(c. 53 minutes, 79 minutes and 89 minutes) cannot doubt that, for them, this legislation is a stepping stone to criminalizing political opinion. Feinstein actually cited the immigration debate as necessitating passing the Bill!

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:45:44 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wilbur

What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

I'll give you 3-1 on a hundred bucks or more, that Holder is not forced out of office over the claims of J. Christian Adams or anything that transpired on the day in question regarding the conduct of the black panthers.

What is the date that Eric Holder must resign or be forced out?

Anyone that uses Fox News as their source deserves to lose some money.

Wilbur what is the bet? I'm in.

Sanity is an idiot...Mediamatters which is another slanted rag paints Adams as an idiot. Unaware of how and why the Justice Dept reached it's decision. he wasn't privily to any of the meetings or the discussions as to what led to final decision. There is also something about not pursuing the minutemen for similar illegal activities.

So wilbur how much are you going to send to me?

What's the bet I'm in at 3-1.

< Message edited by domiguy -- 7/6/2010 12:47:25 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:47:30 PM

Jack45

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline

ADAMS: Inside the Black Panther case Anger, ignorance and lies - Washington Times

On Election Day, three leaders of the New Black Panther Party, King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, were videotaped in paramilitary uniformed wielding nightsticks outside of a polling station in Philadelphia intimidating poll observers and voters. Poll watcher Bartle Bull signed an affidavit stating “I watched the two uniformed men confront voters, and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters… “Their clear purpose and intent was to intimidate voters with whom they did not agree. Their views were, in part, made apparent by the uniform of the organization the two men wore and the racially charged statements they made. For example, I heard the shorter man make a statement directed toward white poll observers that ‘you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.’”

Bull has impeccable anti-racist credentials. He worked as a civil rights lawyer in the 1960s where he filed lawsuits against municipalities in Mississippi that he said were disenfranchising African Americans. Bull concluded, that the actions by the New Black Panthers qualified “as the most blatant form of voter intimidation I have encountered in my life in political campaigns in many states, even going back to the work I did in Mississippi in the 1960s.” The US Commission on Civil Rights filed a complaint against the New Black Panthers. They refused to show up in court or even respond to the charges. Just as sanctions were about to brought, the Justice Department dismissed the USCCR’s complaint because "the facts and the law did not support pursuing" it. Of course, Justice did not really give any elaboration as to what particular facts were missing and why the law wasn’t violated.

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 7

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:52:17 PM

Jack45

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline

There is no doubt that the 1965 Immigration law was designed to replace the White majority with people of color. Howard Dean rejoiced in the fact:

"The fact is that the Democratic party is made up of lots of different people, and we’re all minorities in our party. That’s the way it’s been for a long, long time. We’re the party of opportunity. So the demographic trends favor the Democrats.

If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican Party."

National Public Radio on Friday, August 15, 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 8

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:55:04 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.

What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

50k to 1

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 9

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:55:25 PM

willbeurdaddy

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

There is no doubt that the 1965 Immigration law was designed to replace the White majority with people of color. Howard Dean rejoiced in the fact:

"The fact is that the Democratic party is made up of lots of different people, and we’re all minorities in our party. That’s the way it’s been for a long, long time. We’re the party of opportunity. So the demographic trends favor the Democrats.

If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican Party."

National Public Radio on Friday, August 15, 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee

The "post-racial" Ohblahblah administration. LMAO.

(in reply to Jack45)

Profile

Post #: 10

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:56:38 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

YouTube - Eric Holder Admits No Equality Under Hate Crimes Bill

Jack45 uses Ted Pike as a person to validate his opinion?

Are you fucking kidding me?....Ted fucking Pike?

Jack45 is a joke.

_____________________________

(in reply to Jack45)

Profile

Post #: 11

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 12:58:20 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

There is no doubt that the 1965 Immigration law was designed to replace the White majority with people of color. Howard Dean rejoiced in the fact:

"The fact is that the Democratic party is made up of lots of different people, and we’re all minorities in our party. That’s the way it’s been for a long, long time. We’re the party of opportunity. So the demographic trends favor the Democrats.

If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican Party."

National Public Radio on Friday, August 15, 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee

The "post-racial" Ohblahblah administration. LMAO.

Hey fuckface....How much on the bet? You are getting 50 to 1 on a thousand from Domken. I am willing to only take a hundred off your dumb ass at 3-1.

What say yea, big mouth?

_____________________________

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 12

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:03:03 PM

willbeurdaddy

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.

What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

50k to 1

Deal. Who is going to hold the money? I vote for Mercnbeth.

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 13

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:03:19 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

Under questioning, Attorney Gen. Holder was surprisingly forthright in admitting that the hate bill is not intended to protect everyone, or even the majority. He said only historically oppressed minorities were to benefit. This means Jews, blacks, homosexuals, women, etc. Holder made it clear that if a white Christian male, including a serviceman or police officer, was the victim of a violent hate crime by any minority he would have to find redress from traditional law. He could not avail himself of the triple penalties and rapid government/justice system response given a protected minority.
YouTube - Eric Holder Admits No Equality Under Hate Crimes Bill

These catastrophic admissions were extracted by Senators Sessions (R-AL) and Coburn (R-OK). The webcast of the hearings is here (on right) and the relevant passages are 58.30-61 minutes (Sessions) and 71.30-5 minutes (Coburn).

Film can indeed tell more than the printed word. Anyone who reviews the comments and deliveries by Democratic Senators Feinstein(CA), Cardin (MD)and Schumer (NY)(c. 53 minutes, 79 minutes and 89 minutes) cannot doubt that, for them, this legislation is a stepping stone to criminalizing political opinion. Feinstein actually cited the immigration debate as necessitating passing the Bill!

video linked is less than 10 minutes long. therefore references to 58+ minutes into the video is clearly useless. Furthermore you're linking to a NPN (run by Ted Pike and a virulently homophobic and anti semitic group). which isn't anything close to a source worth listening to.

(in reply to Jack45)

Profile

Post #: 14

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:05:13 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.

What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

50k to 1

Deal. Who is going to hold the money? I vote for Mercnbeth.

What money?

You've admitted to evading rules quite recently. I don't bet with people who brag about being untrustworthy.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 15

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:06:22 PM

juliaoceania

Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

For one, this all sounds like bullshit, for the reasons already pointed out on this thread...

As far as those who get really pissed off when anyone who happens to be Black doesn't get tried and the attorney in charge of making those decisions also happens to be Black, well those people certainly do not get bent out of shape when White people get off the hook involving cases against Black people... I do not see any threads from those decrying racism on this thread when that happens...

Pot-kettle-black (pun intended)

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 16

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:07:16 PM

willbeurdaddy

Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Look into Adams' background and how he was hired. His testimony is worth precisely nothing.

What odds will you give me on Holder resigning/being forced out over this?

50k to 1

Deal. Who is going to hold the money? I vote for Mercnbeth.

What money?

You've admitted to evading rules quite recently. I don't bet with people who brag about being untrustworthy.

Evading rules? what are you talking about?

And having someone hold the money is precisely because neither of us would trust the other as far as we can throw them. So your response is saying that you have a big mouth, but no money to back it up. Surprise surpise surprise

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 17

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:09:35 PM

domiguy

Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

Wilbur no one is holding the money....You pick a date where Holder must either have resigned or been fired directly over the allegations made by Adams.....When that date arrives without a termination of employment you send me the money....If Holder resigns or is fired over the Black panther dismissals than you get my cash.

pretty simple concept....What say yea?

It's only a hundred of yours against three hundred of mine.

< Message edited by domiguy -- 7/6/2010 1:11:03 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 18

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:10:14 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

You admitted quite proudly your use of sockpuppets. I don't bet with people who aren't reliable period.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)

Profile

Post #: 19

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department - 7/6/2010 1:12:19 PM

domiguy