ElanSubdued
Posts: 1511
Status: offline
|
slavekal, quote:
A lot of the questions have a strong yes, a weak yes, and a no. Unless we want to split every hair, for many issues, that is enough. If you ask a person if he/she likes opera, do you really need any more choices than A. yes, a lot... B. yes, but just a little, and C. no, not really? Sure, you could slice it up into a dozen choices, but is that really necessary? Well, clearly, the binary division you've given (essentially "super yes/yes" and "no") isn't enough because otherwise I wouldn't have commented as I did. While answering your quiz, I was continuously faced with questions where the binary presets didn't reflect my views. A large part of this is probably how you're asking the questions, which I'll address below. quote:
The fact that many questions have that format has nothing to do with my preferences. For example, the tattoo issue. You can have many tats, one or two tats, or none. The truth is, I dislike tattoos. The none choice is most compatible with me. If this is the nature of your question, then why not ask that question and do so clearly? In a lot of cases it is hard to tell what you're asking. "Do you like tattoos?" This is a simple, straightforward question for which, likely, a scale is a better choice for answering, but the binary format will work. "Do you have any tattoos" isn't the same question. Assuming that because someone has tattoos means they are a tattoo fan will lead to erroneous data. Also, coy, loaded presets the ilk of "I got more ink than skin", "One or two tasteful tats", "Would Audrey Hepburn mar her skin" cloud the issue again. Take, for example, the answer "One or two tasteful tats". You've mixed quantity with the person's qualitative feelings about tattoos - in this case you've attributed the positive "tasteful". What if a person has tattoos they'd like to get rid of or that they think are not tasteful? Perhaps what you're really saying is "if you have tattoos, regardless of whether you want to keep them or not, I want nothing to do with you". Okay. Fine. But you'd be better to state this clearly rather than asking ambiguously. You could then ask how the reader feels about this statement": strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, neither disagree nor agree, somewhat agree, strongly agree. For myself, given the way you asked the question and the loaded answers, none of the selections reflected my feelings so any answer I checked gave meaningless data. quote:
As far as body types go, it's funny how many women see it as just fat versus skinny. That is just not so. I put up several different types ranging from very skinny, to kind of thin, to athletic, to voluptuous, to a little fat, to very fat. Kate Moss and Beyonce are not built anything alike. Yet, Beyonce is not fat. What I get from your list is two categories: "meets the Hollywood norm" and "doesn't meet the Hollywood norm". I think it's a huge mistake to list Hollywood stars (and only Hollywood stars) as body type role models. This said, with one exception, on both sides of the equation you've given women who are strikingly gorgeous. Therefore, what comes across is "I want a Hollywood hot woman". When answering, I picked randomly because none of the women listed connected with me as a role model for my body type, which I believe is healthy, balanced, and not well reflected by Hollywood. In the OP, you asked "what do y'all think?" This is my feedback. I realize you've written a "how to" book on meeting dominant women. I suggest that quizzes of this sort are *not* how to meet such a woman. For entertainment value only, were I a dominant woman, I might find the quiz amusing. However, if this were a serious test and one of my first contact points with a submissive, it would turn me off entirely. The test boxes women in fetish roles and shows flawed survey design. Neither quality would entice me. Elan.
< Message edited by ElanSubdued -- 7/21/2010 10:30:03 AM >
|