"building a harmonious society" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 6:28:47 AM)


Sounds very peaceful and Zen-like doesn't it

quote:

Chinese police beat official's wife by mistake

BEIJING (Reuters) – Plainclothes police severely beat the wife of a provincial official, mistaking her for one of many Chinese who petition government offices in the hope of redressing wrongs, the China Daily reported on Wednesday.

The case of mistaken identity has become a hot topic among Chinese Internet users, highlighting the abuse that China's armies of petitioners routinely suffer at the hands of police and hired thugs who wish to silence them.

Six public security officers set on Chen Yulian, the wife of a provincial law enforcement officer, last month when she tried to enter her husband's office building, which houses the Hubei provincial party headquarters, the China Daily said.

"This incident is a total misunderstanding," the Communist Party chief of the district bureau explained, according the newspaper. "Our police officers never realized that they beat the wife of a senior leader." China's leaders are obsessed with maintaining social stability and "building a harmonious society" has been their chief concern in the recent years.

Full article here


The moral to this story? The definition of peace is by no means the absence of war.





vincentML -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 6:35:00 AM)

Ah, those Chinese police. Graduates of the Bull Conner school of law enforcement. Something like that could never happen in America...... Oh, wait ....




Sanity -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 6:37:18 AM)


Reuters didn't mention the fact that the victim was elderly:

quote:

Outrage as ‘Wrong-Beating-Gate’ Scandal Breaks

After beating an elderly woman in broad daylight for 16 minutes, the six plainclothes policemen realized they had made a serious mistake — on video.


The assault took place when Chen Yulian tried to enter the main gate of Hubei provincial government office buildings in Wuhan. Chen, 58, is the wife of a Hubei provincial committee official.

“It was a mistake, a complete mistake. We were not aware that we had beaten the wife of an important official,” the policemen said.

This bizarre apology, suggesting that such beatings are OK if they aren’t administered to VIPs, triggered an avalanche of public denunciation. Chinese news articles, blogs and forums voiced their disapproval at what is being called “Wrong Beating–Gate” (打错门).

“So as long as it’s no one important, beating is acceptable behavior?” asked one Internet user, commenting on photos of a bruised Chen lying in a hospital bed. “Is this democracy? Is this rule of law? Is this justice?” another comment reads.

This is a “harmonious society,” a sarcastic poster notes, playing off of President Hu Jintao’s famous slogan.

Some critics see broad social implications. “Just punishing a few policemen will not be enough,” one Chinese news headline declares. In a Shanghai Daily editorial, columnist Wang Yong agrees, saying: “Instead of tossing out these bad apples [the police] one by one, it would be better to ask: Who hired them and enabled them to work against the people?”

http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/07/22/outrage-as-wrong-beating-gate-scandal-breaks/





Sanity -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 6:39:28 AM)


Maybe thats what Obama should have his "Justice Department" do that to all the right wingers who insist on publishing whatever news they want, eh vince?

The could call it "The Fairness Doctrine" or something cute like that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Ah, those Chinese police. Graduates of the Bull Conner school of law enforcement. Something like that could never happen in America...... Oh, wait ....






Owner59 -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:10:05 AM)

This guys has Obama derangement syndrome.

ODS.......[:D]

The world is happy enough with you rush and breitbrat losing the credibility you crave.

No need for violence.

Did you see the breitbrat gasping for air and choking as he felt it slip away?[:D]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfPqG_kjBoY




mnottertail -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:14:09 AM)

Sanity, remember when I told you the Chinese dont give the glimmer of a fuck about individual common people and they wouldnt hesitate to slaughter millions if it served the overall chinese purpose and you said they had to worry about the millions of mothers?


Ain't gonna fuckin' happen, they have a different long term view that doesnt rely on any one faction or short term interest or ideology than we of the ADD americans.


  




Sanity -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:16:14 AM)


What an asshole that guy is, actually having grievances against his government.

What do you think they should do to him 0?




DarkSteven -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:16:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Reuters didn't mention the fact that the victim was elderly:



Well, screw the WSJ - she's only got four years on me.

WTF?  SIX cops to beat an unarmed 58 year old woman?  And is it typical that a 58 year old woman could be mistaken for a protester?

I knew the Chinese were repressive as hell, but this is insane, both in thuggery and stupidity.




Sanity -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:23:00 AM)


My thoughts too, Steven. Theres supposed to be widespread outrage over it among the Chinese, on many different levels.

Think this has legs? Will there be long term implications for Democracy over there because of this?




mnottertail -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:25:10 AM)

my two is no. 




rulemylife -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:29:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


My thoughts too, Steven. Theres supposed to be widespread outrage over it among the Chinese, on many different levels.

Think this has legs? Will there be long term implications for Democracy over there because of this?



What widespread outrage?

Were you outraged the last time you went to Wal-Mart and bought cheap Chinese crap to save yourself a few dollars?




Jeffff -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:30:40 AM)

I have to agree. China is different. They outlook is different.

They can disappear folks faster than a South American Junta.




DarkSteven -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:32:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity.

Think this has legs? Will there be long term implications for Democracy over there because of this?



I hope so but have doubts. Remember Tianenmin Square?




cpK69 -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:33:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The moral to this story? The definition of peace is by no means the absence of war.


Not in a society, where control of the masses is more important than the wellbeing of the individual.

Kim

Edited to add: when I say "a society", I mean any society.




mnottertail -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:37:39 AM)

Heaven and earth are not benevolent.

Tao Te Ching.

They live by that, culturally.




Louve00 -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:38:12 AM)

Kinda like the revolt in Tieneman Square (or however its spelt).  I'm in agreement with Ron on this.  China...like Russia, cares about its gov't.  Only.  The people are expendable...obviously. 




Owner59 -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:40:31 AM)





quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


What an asshole that guy is, actually having grievances against his government.

What do you think they should do to him 0?



Who was president before during and long after Tienanmen Square?

Stomp!

What`s funny is you hijacked your own thread,.............. with ODS........[:D]




mnottertail -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:45:54 AM)

When all the little ants are marching
Red and black antennas waving
we all do it the same
we all do it the same way

Premier Wen Jiabao (americans pronounce it Dave Matthews Band)




Sanity -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:47:20 AM)


Did the Chinese have Internet then?

"The case of mistaken identity has become a hot topic among Chinese Internet users..."



quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
I hope so but have doubts. Remember Tianenmin Square?





mnottertail -> RE: "building a harmonious society" (7/22/2010 7:49:02 AM)

people howling on the net never turns into action.

TeaBaggerJoe




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
9.765625E-02