AAkasha -> RE: How big is the BDSM "community" outside of "this bdsm community"? (7/24/2010 3:50:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: porcelaine quote:
ORIGINAL: BoiJen The person may be kinky but by no means are they part of the kinky group because they chose not to be part of the kinky group. My friends have never desired that. I think it really is a matter of personal preference. While I may find merit in getting involved and attending events, they have other interests they'd rather explore that don't relate to their sexuality. But then again, they aren't on here in the forums either. It simply isn't something they invest energy in outside of the home. What I'm unwilling to do is suggest how anyone spends their time. I believe there is a fixation by some that engage in these practices to adopt the attitude that everyone embraces and/or desires that level of openness concerning their sexuality. I'm well aware that isn't the case. It doesn't make them lesser or more than. I have often wondered why there's a necessity to define where everyone fits for a subculture that places importance on self identity and acceptance. While they may not desire to be part of BDSM umbrella, asserting that is not the case doesn't necessarily make it so either. And why must the distinction be made at all? ~porcelaine Just as there might be a lot of very active "fans" in a particular subculture, doesn't mean just because they are not hardcore into the public aspects of the group doesn't mean they are not as capable, educated, or devoted. Or, maybe they find the trappings of that group to be stifling or not a good fit. What about "fans of Star Trek" vs. "Fans that go to Star Trek conventions"? I see a distinction somewhere with people who have their entire peer group or social group in that "community" and have an active need to either be included or in some cases prominent in that peer group. For me, that peer group is not kinky; if I had to affiliate myself with any peer group by association based on my friends or where I socialize, it would be more likely to be a professional organization in my career, or even a volunteer group where I have friends via common cause -- not the local BDSM munch, or this group online, or any kinky group. There's not enough in common, outside of BDSM, to make that work. Growing up, and still now, I was (am) a pretty die hard Star Wars "fan." I guess my age probably dictates that. I can still recite most of the original three movies, down to the line. I went to a Star Wars convention when I was a teenager. But that was the extent of that, and while I could still probably sit down with any number of "star wars fans" and probably find a lot in common, this is not a peer group I would devote time to, because beyond that we have nothing in common. The same goes with a few bands that I still am passionate about that carry over into my adult life now; I know some people, who I would call casual friends, who still follow said bands and pretty much all their closest friends do also. I am pretty savvy about said band and have many stories to tell myself, but I would not consider these people a community I want to put above my other peer groups, in order of importance. I know hockey fans who follow my local team, and I see them at charity events. I am a die hard Ducks fan. However, I am not on the "booster club," because these people put the team, quite often, and their other duck fan friends, as the core of their social circle. Based on how many games scene, players met, out-of-town arenas visited, I probably would be "right up there" in my experiences, but hanging out with this group, going to movies, or if I were single, dating someone from this group because of this interest, wouldn't work for me. It's a subculture I recognize but, like any sub culture, I don't feel a burning need to be accepted or gain status in. When I look at all these "subcultures" I see a common thing - the exclusion of "outsiders" in many cases, when you get to the most passionate people, and a one-track-mind that is unfortunate and limiting, in my opinion. I also see, in almost all of them, ridiculous politics and positioning, to try to be important in that community. In all of these cases, whether it be fans of a movie series, followers of a band or simply passionate sports fanatics, they all comprise an inclusive "subculture" that is still a much smaller number than the actual number of people who, around the world, share that interest and passion but don't do it at the exclusion of other things. I think BDSM followers, as a whole, is a HUGE number, and the "community" is just a small, small fraction. Akasha
|
|
|
|