RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


willbeurdaddy -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 8:40:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

1896? Couldnt you at least find something in the last 100 years? And imperialist actions, not words?


What part of the u.s., besides alaska, did we acquire except by force of arms or the threat there of?


The Louisiana Purchase comes to mind.

Granted, I have not read the rest of this thread, but I would think that "Purchase" would be the opprative word here.


There were hundreds of land purchases from the Indians, including the famous purchase of New York.




NeedToUseYou -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 8:45:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

The compassion and caring emanating from your post is overwhelmingly sweet.[8|]
who the hell are you to say how a persons disability does or doesnt affect them.
You must be so pissed that you just cant cut them off.




Well, I am quite compassionate, to those that aren't gaming, milking or otherwise the system.

How do I know, well, because I have eyes, and he told me he works under the table, plus other crap.

Actually, in his case (my neighbor), I would love if he got cut off.

There are quite a few people ripping the system you know, why it should surprise you that I would not like that, is confusing.




Aylee -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 8:45:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

1896? Couldnt you at least find something in the last 100 years? And imperialist actions, not words?


What part of the u.s., besides alaska, did we acquire except by force of arms or the threat there of?


The Louisiana Purchase comes to mind.

Granted, I have not read the rest of this thread, but I would think that "Purchase" would be the opprative word here.


There were hundreds of land purchases from the Indians, including the famous purchase of New York.


Be that as it may, most history books do not have entire chapters devoted to it.  I figured that the Lousiana Purchase was well known enough to refute his statement without having to do any research.




vincentML -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 8:47:34 AM)





quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Your definition of Imperialism as occupation of land is somewhat limited.

The ideas of imperialism put forward by historians John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson during 19th century European imperialism were influential. They rejected the notion that "imperialism" required formal, legal control by one government over another country. "In their view, historians have been mesmerized by formal empire and maps of the world with regions colored red. The bulk of British emigration, trade, and capital went to areas outside the formal British Empire. A key to the thought of Robinson and Gallagher is the idea of empire 'informally if possible and formally if necessary.'"[10]

The term imperialism should not be confused with ‘colonialism’ as it often is. Edward Said suggests that imperialism involved “the practice, the theory and the attitudes of a dominating metropolitan centre ruling a distant territory’”. He goes on to say colonialism refers to the “implanting of settlements on a distant territory”. Robert Young supports this thinking as he puts forward that imperialism operates from the centre, it is a state policy, and is developed for ideological as well as financial reasons whereas colonialism is nothing more than development for settlement or commercial intentions.[11]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialism


quote:

: Willbeur ... Even by this overexpansive definition the US doesnt fit.


How so, Willbeur? A declarative statement without any supportive comments or argument does not settle the issue. If you can, make a case to show the United States has not invaded or made a show of force for financial or idealogical reasons.





NeedToUseYou -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 8:57:41 AM)

quote:



Here is a simple question... IF you believe he is working the system, why didnt you report him?


Well, unfortunately, it is just not me that would be involved in a neighborhood conflict, others more "compassionate" than I would prefer not to take the risk of it getting back who did it.

I probably should have anyway, but I am not prone to drag others into a potential fight they don't want to have.

I do feel conflicted.







tazzygirl -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 9:03:54 AM)

What conflict? You report, they investigate. They wont go on just your say so, they will gather proof to the allegations. If he is doing yard work, fences, ect, then he will be easily caught.

I can see a heart condition making it almost impossible to answer phones. Stress for some cardiac patients is a no-no. Physical labor isnt always a no-no.

Since you are conflicted, report him and let the chips fall where they may...




Lucylastic -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 9:54:16 AM)

Yeah conflicted yet you dont know the facts, you are assuming an awful lot. Yes abuse is wrong..but assumption of abuse is far worse in my book and Im glad you dont have the power to make decisions on his future.
Many people feel the way you do, some are right, some are wrong, you seem to be a decent chap but sure as hell not everyone is abusing the system, not even a minor percentage.
Even if his heart condition is mild, do you know what his actual chances of getting a job are?? I mean one that pays for his mortgage, his bills, his food medication never mind what his other costs are? There are a lot more disabled people who want to work, than those seeing it as a way out. Disability pension sure isnt living even properly let alone well.







NeedToUseYou -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 10:23:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Yeah conflicted yet you dont know the facts, you are assuming an awful lot. Yes abuse is wrong..but assumption of abuse is far worse in my book and Im glad you dont have the power to make decisions on his future.
Many people feel the way you do, some are right, some are wrong, you seem to be a decent chap but sure as hell not everyone is abusing the system, not even a minor percentage.
Even if his heart condition is mild, do you know what his actual chances of getting a job are?? I mean one that pays for his mortgage, his bills, his food medication never mind what his other costs are? There are a lot more disabled people who want to work, than those seeing it as a way out. Disability pension sure isnt living even properly let alone well.





First, how is the known fact of someone working under the table, while receiving disability benefits an assumption. My conclusion is if you can work under the table, you are volunteering to work above. If he was so disabled as not to be able to work, then he wouldn't be working. Sure he probably works a month or so a year under the table, from what I gather from him, but he's still scamming the system.

The conflicted is in regards to turning him in, when others just want to let it go, not over the situation in question.


Here's the thing I don't think is sinking in. I've known him for 4 years. He used to come around quite often until I learned all this from him. I can see him if I step outside, for 3-4 years. He also is a liar, claiming some football playing history with a major university, which in the day of the internet was very easy to disprove. Maybe he was a waterboy or something, but that's not what he was claiming, that doesn't really matter though, still it demonstrates his personality.



Here's my ultimate point though, I know other disabled people that no one would dispute are disabled, 1 for example who is way more fucked up, his back is completely fucked, and he can't even sweat except under one armpit, volunteers, and tries to help or do something productive. I'm not ragging on him, because he is doing what he can in an upfront manner. This guy (neighbor) in 4 years has done nothing for anybody, and I know that because he is a braggart, that is why I know. He tells you everything if you can stand to listen to him, and if you don't eventually get rude with him, he'll be over everyday. On top of what he says, I can see him doing stuff. He carries porn pictures on his cellphone screensaver. LOL. Yeah. Classy. He'll eagerly show you.....


So, what is so wrong with placing people to work accordingly. I don't get the outrage. Whether that be phones, data entry, working with animals, visiting the elderly in nursing homes, making meals for shutins, sorting shit at the Salvation army, running errands to Wal-mart, helping with schools, or whatever there are a million "jobs", and plenty that could facilitate all but the most extreme disability. Some jobs would be social and some not, some at home, some driving, some at a location. My point is ultimately that he, and others could do something. Yeah, some can't do anything, and those types are pretty obvious. I know a guy that can't use his arms or legs because of a spinal injury, I'm not complaining about him. The disgust comes from people not doing anything except self-serving activities while receiving benefits on the backs of others, and then they still complain as if I should feel for the poor guy on 365/24 hour a day vacation. I won't apologize for being repulsed by that, to me it is no different than some corporation harming the community for their own benefit, and offering nothing back at all.

In his case though, he has no problem working, if he wants to buy something like a big TV (last time I know of). He has enough cash to buy beer on occasion. If he is doing that against medical advice, well it doesn't do much good paying him to not work. Then he quits or just doesn't look for more under the table jobs.

Anyway, there is value in work, even if it needs to be augmented. How can someone be proud living off others? What kind of person avoids legit taxable work while gaining the majority of their income from it? A leech, and why do we have a system, that doesn't assign partially abled people to do things they can do for the benefit of others.

If that offends, then it offends, I'm repulsed by all leecher activity, whether that be corporate or individual, and the vast assumption it appears is all poor are just trampled on by the forces of society. Yeah, that is what they will say if interviewed by a social worker, it's a different story if you are just hanging around. It's simply not so, more than an insignificant portion are as unconcerned by right and wrong than the worst corporate execs, they just aren't as smart. Some do things like sell pot on the side, to supplement their income as well.

Now, one can say that is just my experience, true enough, so translate that to mean, around here. Maybe all those in Chicago or elsewhere drawing benefits are pure beings.

If you disagree with the premise that those that receive should contribute if at all possible, then we just disagree, and will always disagree on that point. I'm not expecting to make them roofers, but there are things a larger than insignificant portion could do. I know that for a fact. And if someone is working under the table, well, they just proved they can work.

Other Evil Scams, many deny are rampant.
There are other "ploys" such as the don't get married to your babies daddy scam, so the babies mommy can collect while the boyfriend uses his mommies address, even though they are living together, and lie about it. Sure he pays child support, but mommies benefit of food stamps, and rent subsidy, etc... makes it a good deal, more than offsetting the child support.


What gets me is most have no problem, with assertions of evil corporations, or the wealthy using people, while totally rejecting the premise that a portion on the other end are just as nefarious in intent. Unfortunately, that is not a condition relegated to one class or another.

The only real difference between your view and my view, is the percentage, and I think all able and drawing should have to do something.

If you haven't lived in a poor area, I can see how one would look at a shitty house, and shitty stuff, and think these poor people can't possibly want to live like that. Well, I'm telling you a lot would prefer to live like that than work. They were born into it, and that is what they know.


So, my neighbor has proven he can work, and is willing to work if not only sporadically, so I think I'm going to help him.

This thread has been useful, in clearing up my "conflict".

1-800-269-0271



Anyway, nice titty pic... [:D] I blame the distracting nature of the pic for any typos or inconsistency depicted above.




truckinslave -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/8/2010 10:46:03 PM)

quote:

I've known him for 4 years, he works sporadically under the table, he builds a fence. He even solicited me for under the table work before mowing lawns and putting shit together, and not answering the phone. But he was very clear it'd be under the table.


There should be bounties.
And on illegal aliens, too.




thornhappy -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/9/2010 9:20:05 PM)

1) You're allowed a small amount of income even on disability.
2) Working part time wouldn't be enough to support you.  Work too much and you'll lose Medicaid (and it takes 18 months to qualify for that the last I heard.)
3) You get disability if you've paid in long enough. 

True fraud, yeah, kick em off.  Think there's fraud?  Report it.

I'm scared of being disabled due to a newly diagnosed medical condition.  I'd get about 2k a month for disability.  I'd have to sell my house, most of my furniture, and move in to an apartment.  It's not some lifestyle of the stars thing, to live on disability.




thompsonx -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/16/2010 10:13:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

1896? Couldnt you at least find something in the last 100 years? And imperialist actions, not words?


What part of the u.s., besides alaska, did we acquire except by force of arms or the threat there of?


The Louisiana Purchase comes to mind.

Granted, I have not read the rest of this thread, but I would think that "Purchase" would be the opprative word here.


You obviously do not know much about the louisiana purchase...perhaps a little research on your part would keep you from appearing quite so ignorant.




thompsonx -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/16/2010 10:18:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

1896? Couldnt you at least find something in the last 100 years? And imperialist actions, not words?


What part of the u.s., besides alaska, did we acquire except by force of arms or the threat there of?


The Louisiana Purchase comes to mind.

Granted, I have not read the rest of this thread, but I would think that "Purchase" would be the opprative word here.


There were hundreds of land purchases from the Indians, including the famous purchase of New York.



Once again your ignorance of american history is underwhelming.
Have you ever been in the same zip code with a history book that was written for someone beyond the fifth grade?




thompsonx -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/16/2010 10:19:17 AM)

quote:



There should be bounties.
And on illegal aliens, too.


Perhaps there should be bounties on morons.




juliaoceania -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/16/2010 11:03:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:



There should be bounties.
And on illegal aliens, too.


Perhaps there should be bounties on morons.


They may run as fast as undocumented people, but they are not as crafty, so the bounty would be far less....




thompsonx -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/16/2010 11:29:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:



There should be bounties.
And on illegal aliens, too.


Perhaps there should be bounties on morons.


They may run as fast as undocumented people, but they are not as crafty, so the bounty would be far less....



The shear volume would more than make up for the discrepancy in the per capita bounty.




MrRodgers -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/16/2010 12:48:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
Rex,

people here will start to call you conspiracy nut.

We have to find some rose colored glasses.  LOL.

Rex hasn't proposed some theory about One World Government controlled by the Queen of England...

He rightly asserts that there are natural partnerships between the monied class and the political elites. How do you think crony capitalism gets its foot in the door? They buy their way in, and they control via their campaign contributions...

Manufacturing Consent, Noam Chomsky shows how we are basically a product sold to advertisers via ratings, which in turn they sell us products... but we are the real product media sells...

I could go on and on and on about this topic...

I think the reason you are rebuked is because you have to be able to lay a foundation for the claims you make, and Alex Jones doesn't help you do that.

AJ doesn't offer real historical perspective and most discount his views as contemporary dissension and more partisan, political spin.

Yes, Bush & Co. writ large, truly got what they wanted what with 9/11 and the ensuing freedom-intrusional laws with the Patriot act and the start of domestically institutionalizing Big Brother with HLS...not to mention the modification of Posse Comitatus. One must mention it anyway as it may be key to our country's future.

The transformation if we are in its midst, takes many years and according to most, started in 1952 with their first meeting in 1954 and laid that foundation beginning over 60 years.

I have a fairly very high bar (getting lower almost everyday) for believing certain conspiracies but...we do know that quite a no. of very powerful people do have these secret meetings. Why ?

They aren't meeting to play Canasta and they aren't secret because they are kinky.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/17/2010 12:51:04 AM)

Needtouseyou "Your error is the assumption I assume most on disability are pieces of shit, but enough are to make getting those that can contribute, actually contribute. I'm so mean. So, the method of approving and monitoring these types needs revision. "

With official unempoyment hovering at around 9.5%, and the real number likely almost double that, who is going to hire an older disabed person? Even volunteer organizations seek younger, more able people who are able to do a wider variety of tasks.




brokedickdog -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/17/2010 7:10:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

With this Obama Economy I heard that it would be "wise" to stay out of the stock market for the next 9 months.


I don't mean to slam you popeye but it is very rare that an economy belongs to, or is created or destroyed by, a president. I have neither specific love nor specific loathing for O'Bama. My comment is not in defense of him. But in focusing on one individual the overall is usually missed.

The economy was alleged to have prospered under Clinton. Yet, a number of the policies under Clinton are also alleged to have led to the economic crisis that occurred during George W's administration (repeal of Glass-Steagle, etc.)

My point in the above is not to take sides with either of those guys. Rather it is to point out that 1) every president inherits what came before him and he had little or no control over that, 2) that no president has much economic control anyway, and even less immediate control, 3) that every president has thousands (the most obvious being the house and senate) of others standing along side him. Some of those give the appearance they are opposed and others they are for. I think it important to acknowledge that most in that group use the same tailors.

Dark Stephan commented on another thread earlier today saying, in essence, that we're paying our elected officials in excess of 100K annually to point fingers at each other. That hardly seems a good investment.

As for Simon Johnson he's a pretty bright guy. I read his commentary on the net from time to time. I also read his book "Thirteen Bankers." Clearly he is educated and did considerable research for that. I agreed with much of what he expressed.






tazzygirl -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/17/2010 7:12:45 AM)

Is it any wonder why the tea party is gaining so much momentum,




truckinslave -> RE: This Is What Collapsing Empire Looks Like (8/17/2010 4:25:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:



There should be bounties.
And on illegal aliens, too.


Perhaps there should be bounties on morons.


I have collected more than one bounty. Check six.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02