RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 2:45:53 PM)

Once again the topic has swung away from the OP...diversion and obfuscation from those who are obviously embarrassed by this Angle woman..
As well they should be.This woman is a throw up from the 50s  for WASPS.While Reid is slime, this chick is newtshit out of her depth and altho not scary, more embarassing...as a woman let alone an american or a tea party follower.I would change the subject too



truckinslave -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 3:09:00 PM)

quote:

newtshit out of her depth


I'm going to sorta steal that for future use.

A decade from now, "barackshit outta his depth" will have quite the ring.
Nice phrase.



Lucylastic -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 3:17:46 PM)

in ten years, nah it will be another repub...guaranteed ;[;)]



Sanity -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:12:38 PM)


Did it really escape your notice that it was julia who changed the subject.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Once again the topic has swung away from the OP...diversion and obfuscation from those who are obviously embarrassed by this Angle woman..
As well they should be.This woman is a throw up from the 50s  for WASPS.While Reid is slime, this chick is newtshit out of her depth and altho not scary, more embarassing...as a woman let alone an american or a tea party follower.I would change the subject too




juliaoceania -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:20:29 PM)

quote:

Did it really escape your notice that it was julia who changed the subject.


Actually it was derailed by DCWoody and Hunky... and then it was further derailed by truckinslave here

quote:

'but it'll help if 0 keeps on bowing and scraping to foreign leaders, Michelle Antoinette goes to Rio, and another few multiterm Dims go up on ethics charges.


Just so you are clear who went off topic where



Lucylastic -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:24:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Did it really escape your notice that it was julia who changed the subject.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Once again the topic has swung away from the OP...diversion and obfuscation from those who are obviously embarrassed by this Angle woman..
As well they should be.This woman is a throw up from the 50s  for WASPS.While Reid is slime, this chick is newtshit out of her depth and altho not scary, more embarassing...as a woman let alone an american or a tea party follower.I would change the subject too



No I didnt notice, what I did notice however is that you ignored the actual majority of my on topic post...to hijack..



DCWoody -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:27:06 PM)

You asked me not to turn it into an abortion shitfest, I obliged, quit ya moanin ;)



juliaoceania -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:33:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DCWoody

You asked me not to turn it into an abortion shitfest, I obliged, quit ya moanin ;)


I am not "moanin", I am pointing out where the thread went awry. The first time was when you tried to make it about abortion, the second time was when you started your side convo about how to get fluoride out of water....




DCWoody -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:36:11 PM)

"you tried to make it about abortion"
"you started your side convo"
oy oy oy oy oy, you brought both up, and then pah arrived...



joether -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:36:31 PM)

Yes, why is it conservatives dont want to gush over Sharron Angle? Isn't she as good or better then Sarah Palin? I would think you guys would be all over, promoting her, to win against Senator Reid. We aren't seeing enough gushing and mindless rambling in promotion(s) in her favor. That's 50 lashings with a wet noodle!

This *IS* one of the canidates the Tea Party is promoting. Their other big star, is Mr. Rand Paul. These two combined simply make the Tea Party seem like the road show from Heck. One would think, an organization would want individuals who are solid of mind, character, and thought; not, a pair who spew crazy crap when their mouths open and speak.

But then, if one has been observing the Tea Party for the past year, they know, the canidates are just mirror images of their followers. I personally, havent see or heard Mrs Angle or Mr. Paul, speak in a racist tone, but then, again, I wouldn't be surprised either. Just look at the company they keep...



juliaoceania -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:46:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DCWoody

"you tried to make it about abortion"
"you started your side convo"
oy oy oy oy oy, you brought both up, and then pah arrived...



No, I did not bring up how to get fluoride out of the water, I brought up that Angle was worried about it

I also did not bring up abortion other than to point out Angle's wildly unmainstream stance on it, which you objected to my wording in my post, and then I actually conceded it might not be a "nutbag" position, but it is a non-mainstream one... so stop trying to make this about anything but Angle and her radical views, thanks



juliaoceania -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:51:26 PM)

I wonder if the tea party will disappear after 2010



DCWoody -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 4:56:46 PM)

 Tbh I don't know shit about her other than what I've just scanned on wiki.....and...I quite like the sound of her. Don't agree with much of her shit, but for a politician in a significantly politically differing nation that's not surprising.....she does seem to stand up and fight for what she thinks is right....heh, although scrolling down the article I really definitely don't agree with much of her shit....



joether -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 5:58:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DCWoody

 Tbh I don't know shit about her other than what I've just scanned on wiki.....and...I quite like the sound of her. Don't agree with much of her shit, but for a politician in a significantly politically differing nation that's not surprising.....she does seem to stand up and fight for what she thinks is right....heh, although scrolling down the article I really definitely don't agree with much of her shit....



Well then, you should study up on the person. Look to some of the videos, and become better informed of the issues. That's your responsibility as a US citizen!

Here is Sharron Angle's Former Website. First question should be....Why take it all down? Is there something to hide? Hell Yeah! Just read the whole thing. It is simply amazing ANYONE would be this insane.

A) She wants to put our military on the border and in clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.
B) Drill in the Artic National Wildlife Refugee, as well, as allow more drilling and less regulation of the oil industry (sort of the reason that led to the Gulf of Mexico problem).
C) Repeal the 16th Amendment.
D) Wants to have tort reform. So companies pay less, when your left foot is chopped off by accident; when you just wanted a tooth extracted...
E) She wants less regulation on the rules that govern the handling, transportation, and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel.
F) Sharron, is for the 'balanced budget' Amendment. Yeah, she's in the WRONG party, for balancing the budget, and keeping the national debt down.
G) "Sharron Angle respects and defends the rights of the individual to own property". ....unless they are muslim, and setting up a building that houses a mosque within it, just two blocks from Ground Zero, right?
H) The elimination of the Department of Education. Since kids in Nevada shouldn't have to compete for being #1, against those in Massachusetts.

All the way at the bottom, you find out who is paying for this site to be posted on the internet. Rather funny read. Its more comedy, just to listen/watch her on TV.



Lucylastic -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 6:00:25 PM)

Joether, we have very many non US citizens on this board.... Woody is one of them, I am another,
we have no responsibility to anything the US does:)
Mine is a morbid curiosity. and one hell of a learning experience



DCWoody -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 6:07:17 PM)

"That's your responsibility as a US citizen!"
[:D]



truckinslave -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/14/2010 6:17:48 PM)

quote:

in clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.


I thought Posse Comitatus forbid the use of the military against citizens......

E. Don't know if this is her position, or some spin. Don't know what the existing rules are, except for some vague familiarity with the transportation regs. I never hauled any. I do know she's in favor of Yucca Mountain as the storage site for spent fuel, and I agree with that.

I agree with some recognizable form of everything else. Pretty mainstream stuff....



pahunkboy -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/15/2010 9:31:29 AM)

I dont know why people hate the Ron Paul party.  I missed the part where Sharron wants to end the fed.



joether -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/15/2010 2:19:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
quote:


in clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.


I thought Posse Comitatus forbid the use of the military against citizens......


Nope, its a rather normal misunderstanding of the act. The use of the Military (even special forces), inside the US, is against the law. It can be authorized by the President on a limited basis, if, say for example, catching a terrorist when a WMD is known to exist in a city. But, beyond that, and except for 'Martial Law', the US Military can not be used as law enforcement within the USA. The National Guard, can be used, and not violate Posse Comitatus, since they are considered a 'state militia', not federal army.

Posse Comitatus Act




jlf1961 -> RE: Sharron Angle - Tea Party Sweetheart (8/15/2010 2:31:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Nope, its a rather normal misunderstanding of the act. The use of the Military (even special forces), inside the US, is against the law. It can be authorized by the President on a limited basis, if, say for example, catching a terrorist when a WMD is known to exist in a city. But, beyond that, and except for 'Martial Law', the US Military can not be used as law enforcement within the USA. The National Guard, can be used, and not violate Posse Comitatus, since they are considered a 'state militia', not federal army.

Posse Comitatus Act




Actually, you are wrong, please note the following:

quote:

Border security is not domestic law enforcement. It is protecting our nation from foreign intruders. Besides, Posse Comitatus was passed in 1878, yet the U.S. Cavalry continued to patrol the U.S. Mexico Border until 1924. If Congress intended Posse Comitatus to prevent the military from securing our nation, the cavalry wouldn't have continued on the border for another 46 years.
former US Border Patrol Supervisor David Stoddard

source



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2026
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875