Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? Page: <<   < prev  15 16 17 [18] 19   next >   >>
[Poll]

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?


FOR
  83% (64)
AGAINST
  16% (13)


Total Votes : 77
(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:10:03 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		Look for a cmail possibly later written between many cold showers so my fingers actually work......dear you could make a Lady type one handed, and I dont even DO that,,,,,,,

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.

(in reply to BentUnit)
Profile   Post #: 341
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:10:23 AM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I know that you stopped posting a while ago, VAA, and you know that I miss your REAL postings!




Under the current standards, she would have to moderate herself if she posted like she did then. This is not an insult at all but a compliment. The woman was the queen of thinly veiled snark and one of my first friends on CM. I miss her posts too. In fact, they would come in handy on oh....can we say...this OP's 30th bullshit whiney ass bitchfest?


_____________________________

I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence.

When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 342
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:11:09 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline 		HEY!! ya gonna share??? LOL

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 343
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:15:11 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!!
I like to think in the beginning before I had my fill of some posters "who may or may not have had the attributes of trolldom" I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. One can only want to play "whack a troll" for so long before has to figure out how to do it and not get in trouble or explode from not sayin anything......

disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.

(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 344
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:15:22 AM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: laurell3


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I know that you stopped posting a while ago, VAA, and you know that I miss your REAL postings!




Under the current standards, she would have to moderate herself if she posted like she did then. This is not an insult at all but a compliment. The woman was the queen of thinly veiled snark and one of my first friends on CM. I miss her posts too. In fact, they would come in handy on oh....can we say...this OP's 30th bullshit whiney ass bitchfest?




HEY!! I can call her a ROLE MODEL!!!

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 345
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:15:42 AM   
BentUnit


Posts: 897
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: laurell3


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I know that you stopped posting a while ago, VAA, and you know that I miss your REAL postings!




Under the current standards, she would have to moderate herself if she posted like she did then. This is not an insult at all but a compliment. The woman was the queen of thinly veiled snark and one of my first friends on CM. I miss her posts too. In fact, they would come in handy on oh....can we say...this OP's 30th bullshit whiney ass bitchfest?



My Darling..I can only hope you enjoy my thinly veiled snark...and even when it is isn't so veiled.

<sigh>

I can only hope.
<no one god damned understands me!..sniffle>

(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 346
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:16:32 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		I assume that means you are in the line too????? If so, YUP, but dont need to put my secret methods down here,

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.

(in reply to GreedyTop)
Profile   Post #: 347
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:17:18 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline 		I need to learn the thinly veiled thing.. I aint so good at that...

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to BentUnit)
Profile   Post #: 348
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:18:41 AM   
VideoAdminAlpha


Posts: 3876
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		We have a wonderful search engine here if one knows what one is looking for.

_____________________________


You can't please all the people all of the time.Unfortunately there are times you cannot please any of them :( You can only do your best, and hope they realize that.

(in reply to GreedyTop)
Profile   Post #: 349
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:19:40 AM   
BentUnit


Posts: 897
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

I need to learn the thinly veiled thing.. I aint so good at that...


GT I am soo hearing ya there.

I tries subtly ONCE and it gave me a massive fucking headache and I vowed never to try again.

(in reply to GreedyTop)
Profile   Post #: 350
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:20:15 AM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline 		To the OP

Since you seem to have like-ability issues and furthermore seem to be baffled by same, let me give you some advice.

How to be likeable:

You could try not being antagonistic.
You could try not deliberately provoking people and then playing the victim card.
You could try being pleasant.
You could try being polite and courteous.

In other words, you could try behaving pretty much the opposite way of how you have been behaving both as your current handle and as your former.

If you are unhappy with your present set of circumstances change them.

If you are happy here...Great! Congrats! Mazel Tov!
If not, the only variable you can change is yourself, and if you are powerless to do that, go to a meeting, call a pastor, priest, or shrink... why wallow in your own stink?
You don't have to.

You point out the perceived faults of everyone... when you have one finger pointed out, how many are pointed back at you?

edit: omitted word



< Message edited by angelikaJ -- 8/31/2010 9:27:47 AM >

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to Saykiatric)
Profile   Post #: 351
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:21:21 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline 		yay Angelika!!

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 352
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:23:16 AM   
Daddysredhead


Posts: 23574
Joined: 11/6/2005
From: Northern (yet still part of the South) Virginia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha

Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!!
I like to think in the beginning before I had my fill of some posters "who may or may not have had the attributes of trolldom" I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. One can only want to play "whack a troll" for so long before has to figure out how to do it and not get in trouble or explode from not sayin anything......

disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......


I find that saying "Bless your heart" kinda works, but I'm Southern like that.

_____________________________

Founding Member, Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's

Do not challenge me to a battle of wits & come to fight unarmed.

Are you really that stupid? ~ Bless your heart

13th doughnut


(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 353
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:24:43 AM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha

Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!!
I like to think in the beginning before I had my fill of some posters "who may or may not have had the attributes of trolldom" I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. One can only want to play "whack a troll" for so long before has to figure out how to do it and not get in trouble or explode from not sayin anything......

disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......


haha...maybe...maybe not...we weren't exactly prone to staying on whatever the ridiculous topic of the day was as I recall. I do remember cleaning my pc screen a few times because of you. One can only read some asshat pontificating about how if their slave won't die for them they're not true so many times before the shit hits the fan...just sayin....*cough* I mean back then....of course....

_____________________________

I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence.

When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 354
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:26:07 AM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha

Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!!
I like to think in the beginning I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts.

disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......


You did post many a well thought post that I very much appreciated... (and I as well envied your finesse at deftly handling trolls back in the day)

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 355
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:27:06 AM   
BentUnit


Posts: 897
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

To the OP

Since you seem to have like-ability issues and furthermore seem to be baffled by same, let me give you some advice.

How to be likeable:

You could try not being antagonistic.
You could try not deliberately provoking people and then playing the victim card.
You could try being pleasant.
You could try being polite and courteous.

In other words, you could try behaving pretty much the opposite way of how you have been behaving both as your current handle and as your former.

If you are unhappy with your present set of circumstances change them.

If you are happy here...Great! Congrats! Mazel Tov!
If not, the only variable you can change is yourself, and if you are powerless to do that, go to a meeting, call a pastor, priest, or shrink... why wallow in your own stink?
You don't have to.

You point the perceived faults of everyone... when you have one finger pointed out, how many are pointed back at you?




Baby,

You're using rational logic on a creature who has no concept of the idea.
What you are doing here, while heroic and noble, is the equivalent of pushing shit up-hill with a pointy stick.

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 356
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:27:08 AM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: laurell3


haha...maybe...maybe not...we weren't exactly prone to staying on whatever the ridiculous topic of the day was as I recall. I do remember cleaning my pc screen a few times because of you. One can only read some asshat pontificating about how if their slave won't die for them they're not true so many times before the shit hits the fan...just sayin....*cough* I mean back then....of course....



Good times!

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to laurell3)
Profile   Post #: 357
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:28:50 AM   
SorceressJ


Posts: 2968
Joined: 7/24/2010
Status: offline 		VAA: there where should we put Your "secret methods", hmm? *waggles an eyebrow*
I have nothing else to say to the OP, and strongly recommend that he refrain from posting in my inbox like he did last summer when I disagreed with him, when he was blacklion.

_____________________________

‎Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc. <93>)O(

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 358
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:30:47 AM   
SorceressJ


Posts: 2968
Joined: 7/24/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

To the OP

Since you seem to have like-ability issues and furthermore seem to be baffled by same, let me give you some advice.

How to be likeable:

You could try not being antagonistic.
You could try not deliberately provoking people and then playing the victim card.
You could try being pleasant.
You could try being polite and courteous.

In other words, you could try behaving pretty much the opposite way of how you have been behaving both as your current handle and as your former.

If you are unhappy with your present set of circumstances change them.

If you are happy here...Great! Congrats! Mazel Tov!
If not, the only variable you can change is yourself, and if you are powerless to do that, go to a meeting, call a pastor, priest, or shrink... why wallow in your own stink?
You don't have to.

You point out the perceived faults of everyone... when you have one finger pointed out, how many are pointed back at you?

edit: omitted word




{{{THIS}}} Thank you, jellie..

_____________________________

‎Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc. <93>)O(

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 359
RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? - 8/31/2010 9:31:57 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha
1)You are NOT a newbie by your own statements.
2) Sarcasm is not your strong suit,even though you think it is.
3) Trim your fuckin quotes..........or I will trim them for you.....please.

Polite enough?

As another member who does her best to stay within that 'thinly veiled' dance with TOS (I highly doubt there are many who are unaware of that) I have a quick question for verification. 

Since the name calling subject has come up so often, is it still name calling if it's true?  Just a random example to help illustrate.  Let's say someone creates a thread and during the course of that thread, it's proven that he's a liar.  Is it acceptable to call that person a liar?  Why would that be different than any other description with another interchangeable term.  One for Myself, perhaps, such as Domme.

Where does the line get drawn?  Let's say someone is proven a liar.  Can we add adjectives such as untrustworthy liar or pathetic liar?  Can we change the term to useless and untrustworthy if someone is a known liar? 

Of course, most people have some self respect and wouldn't want to be caught lying in the first place and would never say something that would cause someone to accuse them of having so little worth in character, but what would happen if we had an OP that had so little integrity?  Is that acceptable?


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to VideoAdminAlpha)
Profile   Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 17 [18] 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? Page: <<   < prev  15 16 17 [18] 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094