RumpusParable
Posts: 1923
Joined: 7/7/2005 From: NYC now! Status: offline
|
I agree and won't do it if the child is unable to say they want it. Some may find this odd, but I had mine done at age 4 after giving consent... I knew I wanted them and understood the permanence. Unfortunately, they were done with a gun as no one then and there knew better. :( Personally, I can't wear inferior metals at all anywhere on my skin as I am highly sensitive and acidic; my body reacts badly and/or eats the jewelry away. This is even moreso with my stretched lobes now as they've gotten bigger; I can no longer wear plastic plugs or even 316LVM stainless steel for long anymore and stick to glass, wood and silicone for daily wear. As a piercer, if the child is with their parent/guardian and BOTH state they want the piercing -done correctly, not with a gun- then I will do it. This has happened ONCE so far in my piercing history... I can't tell you how many mothers have brought in children under the age of one that 1) I have turned down due to consent discomfort, 2) have changed their mind because I won't use a gun on them, and/or 3) the child was so young it was not just a consent issue but also a health issue (under the age of 8 weeks, a few under 2 weeks and one literally days old I kid you not). I can't speak about how I feel on this trend without using very harsh words so I'll just leave it at that indication...
_____________________________
Relationships come and go, but plastination is forever. I generally use fast-reply. If directing my post at someone specific I will indicate so. Minimal summary: Artist, Disabled Veteran, Vegan, Pornographer, and Agender dominant female.
|