RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


LadyNTrainer -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 12:03:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
You mean other than the fact that you most commonly post in the Ask A Mistress forum? [8D]


I knew it.  Domiguy is really a chick.  Spread the word.  [:D]




LadyHibiscus -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 1:04:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
You mean other than the fact that you most commonly post in the Ask A Mistress forum? [8D]


I knew it.  Domiguy is really a chick.  Spread the word.  [:D]




[sm=champ.gif]




Lockit -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 2:11:16 PM)

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]




Jaybeee -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 2:58:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jaybeee
I do occasionally run into women I think I may be able to extract useful information from. But very few.


Useful information is that significantly gendered for you?  What type of information are you seeking that in your experience men have and women lack?


Most MEN don't possess the kind of information I'd like. That said, the usual mindless drone of Gucci handbagged housewives in cafe's about what some dumb cow of a friend refused to come out to swig Chardonnay can occasionally be interspersed with the words, "My husband is worried there'll be a...", at which point my ears perk up. I've generated quite a few windfalls out of them. Their husbands ought to be more careful, unguarded pillow talk can sink ships.

One area that fascinates me is flirting (offline). What expertise in that, if any, do you have?


quote:

quote:

I've presumed you're female based on your member name and avatar. Just what gender are you, in fact?


Now that a cloud of doubt has been cast on my gender sufficient for you to ask this question, what gender do you think I am based on the way I communicate?


You've replied to a question with a question, tsk tsk. How rude.

quote:

I participate semi-regularly on some vanilla boards with a non-gendered nick that is descriptive of my personal interests (eg, it's on the order of "soccerplayer" or "botanist_35" or "portrait_artist"; you get the idea). Because I post almost exclusively on "male" topics such as science and skepticism, I am invariably referred to as "he" by other posters. On this board my nick and avatar is gendered, so that immediately influences how people view what I have to say. It strongly influences how people engage with me and how they view the facts and theories I am presenting, even in cases where I am making the exact same argument.

There are no factual points of difference between what I am saying about human biology and evolution as LadyNTrainer and what I am saying elsewhere as "Woodcarver9", but the way in which people respond to my academic arguments varies significantly if they believe I am female.

What do you believe?


I believe that pleasure is the pinnacle of life's goals. Though i suspect you didn't want a literal answer. If you want any other, feel free to rephrase your question accordingly.

quote:

And just what incentive is on offer for explaining my rationale to you?
The same incentive as everyone has when participating on a random discussion on the Internet. As long as you find it personally entertaining or amusing, you have incentive to continue. When it stops being fun, people go home. What would you consider to be a fun consequence of your participation?


One that tittillated me with juicy new facts, one that surprised me, that delighted me. Do you get the feeling you're not asking the right questions here?

quote:

I would add to that my speculation that hormone fluctuations, similar to the above, are the reason that 5% of any society is homosexual, however homo-friendly or homophobic.


quote:

You're not the only person who has speculated that. The jury is still at least partly out on the subject, but it certainly does look like there's significant truth there.


Too many juries, too few laws.




Twoshoes -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 3:08:13 PM)

What strikes me about Jaybeee's posts is the amount of screen space it takes for him to communicate: "I'm superior". It's just two words...




ElanSubdued -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 6:42:32 PM)

quote:

LadyNTrainer:
I knew it.  Domiguy is really a chick.  Spread the word.  [:D]


Well... he can Bitchy at times.  This suggestion explains a lot of things. [;)]

Elan.




ElanSubdued -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 6:49:08 PM)

GreedyTop,

--- *smoooch*!!!

Contrary evidence for DMFParadox.  Fancy moves aren't always necessary to pick up "hot chix"!

*send hugs back* :-)

E.




GreedyTop -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/29/2010 10:38:41 PM)

YAY!! HUGS!!




VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/30/2010 5:45:05 AM)

Ok, looking in again folks. Sorry, but I think we have gotten almost as consistently off topic as possible with this one. I am laying it to rest, and any of the "sidetrails" that were started that you think have merit, please feel free, no obligated to start another thread [;)]




Page: <<   < prev  18 19 20 21 [22]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625