Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

Oklahoma BDSM Case


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Alternative Lifestyles in the News >> Oklahoma BDSM Case Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 4:56:40 AM   
Malkinius


Posts: 1814
Joined: 1/9/2004
Status: offline
Greetings all....

I was just given this link about a case in Oklahoma involving BDSM and thought I would pass it on here.

http://newsok.com/beating-case-reveals-fetish/article/3511030#ixzz14Ne7jj61

It is definitely something to be aware of in those things some people do.

Be well all....

Malkinius


_____________________________

A questioner by inclination...An Auctioneer for the fun of it
http://www.HouseMalkinius.com    The goal is community.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 5:04:50 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
Who is charging him if she is now defending him?

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 5:12:28 AM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline
There's an interesting thread concerning this case on fetlife in the BDSM and the Law group.

Here's another article concerning the case... http://www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S=13447173

quote:


Prosecutors said in March they pressed charges because the violence went beyond consent and that you cannot have a contract to commit a violent act against a person. Prosecutors said this is a case of domestic abuse.


(in reply to AquaticSub)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 5:13:01 AM   
Malkinius


Posts: 1814
Joined: 1/9/2004
Status: offline
Greetings all.....

Just a bit of an update I just found about the case.

http://www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S=13447173

In domestic abuse cases the state can prosecute even when the victim recants and does not want the case to go to trial. Once a charge is made everything is up to the DA, the victim no longer has a say in it due to too many cases where a victim was forced by the abuser to recant. Once you involve the police it is out of your hands forever.

Be well....

Malkinius


_____________________________

A questioner by inclination...An Auctioneer for the fun of it
http://www.HouseMalkinius.com    The goal is community.

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 5:29:33 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Malkinius,

Thanks for posting the article.  This is what can happen if police are specifically brought into the situation.  Her testimony on the consensual S/m, D/s, or M/s part of their life may or may not help now that he's actually been charged.  Definitely something for folks to think about and another good reminder to be aware of what the law says in your state.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 5:37:25 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline


The argument that the prosecution seems to be making is that on a specific occasion she was beatern w/o consent.

quote:


Prosecutors allege that he handcuffed, choked and beat Larsen early Feb. 17. Prosecutors say he was angry because she wanted to end their relationship after catching him having sex with another woman in a nightclub's parking lot. Prosecutors allege he acted illegally because she did not consent that time to being handcuffed and beaten.

Read more: http://newsok.com/beating-case-reveals-fetish/article/3511030#ixzz14hJiyG7n


So, I'm not sure how much bearing this would have on a stable, consenting BDSM relationship?


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 6:05:48 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
I've often said that the most important thing a submissive brings to a relationship is a willingness not to prosecute. Although the prosecutors in this case are going to milk the bdsm angle for all it is worth bdsm in this story is little more than a footnote. It does sound like he cuffed and beat her just like the article says and that she eventually recanted not because she lied but because she changed her mind and decided she wants him back. It's still a sobering story that plays up how important it is to know the person you are involved with as well as you possibly can. Even then you are still rolling the dice to an extent.

Why is she not up on charges of giving false statements to the police? She openly admitted that she lied.


(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 6:34:09 AM   
Ait


Posts: 30
Joined: 9/7/2010
Status: offline
I'm *fairly* sure that Consent doesn't factor in in "Domestic abuse" or anything resembling it in Oklahoma. Or at least that's what I've been told and it's something we keep in mind.

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 8:50:16 AM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
. . . That's what you get for fucking people you pick up on Fetlife. LMAO


_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to Ait)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 9:07:32 AM   
Hotch


Posts: 267
Joined: 5/13/2004
Status: offline
All bringing up the BDSM element of their relationship is going to do in this case, is give BDSM a (non consensual) black eye.

Once charges were filed, the case needed to be tried on it's own merits. Bringing up BDSM isn't going to make it go away, it's only going to give the prosecutor ammunition to build a case for habitual spousal abuse (He exploited her interest in rough sex to control her and cloud her ability to distinguish between consensual and non consensual behavior.)

Stupid, stupid people.

(in reply to Ait)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 9:15:25 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Do we know why she retracted her statement? She clearly split up with her partner for a period of time, so must have been unhappy about something.

Perhaps the authorities believe that she has retracted her statement out of fear? Or a (sad) desire to reconcile with her abusive partner?

I have no clue if this is the case, but it has to be a possibility, surely?


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 10:23:37 AM   
thatsub


Posts: 176
Joined: 5/3/2010
Status: offline
I read that article and I could not understand how she could talk about trust, when didn't think twice about starting this chain of events. 

_____________________________

Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. Plato

Confucius say: To make a long story short, don't tell it.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 12:16:02 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
Mistrial: no show jury member drunk

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to thatsub)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 12:32:10 PM   
thatsub


Posts: 176
Joined: 5/3/2010
Status: offline
I still shocked how government still tries to push the case w/o a witness. Just few days ago I was watching a TV show similar to "Cops", and there was a this man who, instead of continuing a fight, when he got attacked by his neighbor he called police. Both people appeared to be sober. Police told the guy, who called them, that even though they can see a mark on his face from a punch, there is nothing they can do, since there were no witnesses!!! Police kept telling the guy to forget it and go away before they put *him* in jail.


_____________________________

Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. Plato

Confucius say: To make a long story short, don't tell it.

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/8/2010 1:21:42 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
It's not so much the idea of government 'pushing' a case without a witness.  Many of these laws are on the books specifically because a domestic partner has a greater ability to coerce, intimidate, or apologize their way to getting charges dropped.  This is what allowed the cycle to be repeated in so many legitimate cases of domestic abuse.  

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to thatsub)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/9/2010 11:46:22 AM   
submissivemale22


Posts: 428
Joined: 3/4/2008
From: CinCity
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

It's not so much the idea of government 'pushing' a case without a witness.  Many of these laws are on the books specifically because a domestic partner has a greater ability to coerce, intimidate, or apologize their way to getting charges dropped.  This is what allowed the cycle to be repeated in so many legitimate cases of domestic abuse.  


indeed. the title of this thread indicates that the consensual acts are what are being prosecuted, and that is not the case.

DV cases are commonly pursued even after the accuser declines to testify or changes her story, if the facts give rise to an inference of wrong doing. there is an incredible amount of pressure placed on these women (both physical and threatening), and for that reason there are specific hearsay exceptions which will allow their prior statements to law enforcement to be used in court.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/11/2010 12:04:54 PM   
submaleokc


Posts: 2
Joined: 10/27/2010
Status: offline
I saw the article in the paper here the other day.. I haven't had a chance to read up on it at all though.. Going to try and do that today.

(in reply to submissivemale22)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/11/2010 12:17:04 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

Who is charging him if she is now defending him?


It's something I have said many times on these boards and had a lot of people telling me I was wrong.

The prosecutor can bring charges on his own regardless of whether the alleged victim cooperates.

(in reply to AquaticSub)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/11/2010 12:24:55 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

The argument that the prosecution seems to be making is that on a specific occasion she was beatern w/o consent.



There is no such thing as a consensual beating in legal terms.

As much as we believe in that concept in BDSM circles, it does not exist legally.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Oklahoma BDSM Case - 11/14/2010 1:59:17 PM   
TheHungryTiger


Posts: 454
Joined: 3/9/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
There is no such thing as a consensual beating in legal terms.

As much as we believe in that concept in BDSM circles, it does not exist legally.


Even when not specifically referenced, lack of consent is an element of assault under common law. See Volenti non fit injuria

But even if you ignore that principal, there are 13 states that have consent explicitly and directly written into their assault laws. Alabama ALA. CODE § 13A-2-7 Colorado COLO. REV. STAT. § 18-1-505 Delaware DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, §§ 451–453 Hawaii HAW. REV. STAT. §§ 702-233 to -235 Maine ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 17-A, § 109 Missouri MO. ANN. STAT. § 565.080 Montana MONT. CODE ANN. § 45-2-211 New Hampshire N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 626:6 New Jersey N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:2-10 North Dakota N.D. CENT. CODE § 12.1-17-08 Pennsylvania 18 PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. § 311 Tennessee TENN. CODE ANN. § 39-13-104 and Texas TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.06

And on top of all that, there have been multiple different court cases where someone engaging in BDSM facing legal charges has not only use consent as a defence, but has used it successful. The latest being Christopher E. Miner.

This is not to say that consent is ALWAYS a defence. The kinky sex going on between Robert Frederick Glass and Sharon Lopatka still landed him in one hell of a legal mess even though everythign was consentual. But the bumper-sticker sized talking point that "There is no such thing as a consensual beating in legal terms" is grosly oversimplifed at best and a flat out lie at worst.


_____________________________

Bondage Ropes
High quality center-marked
bondage ropes and supplies.
www.kinkyropes.com

Ads by Goooooogle

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Alternative Lifestyles in the News >> Oklahoma BDSM Case Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141