RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

AquaticSub -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 1:34:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

~Fast Reply~

And there is definately a bit of a damned if you do, damn if you don't situation with "search for previous threads but don't bump them".

Have to disagree with you here, Aqua.  It's two entirely different things.  Reading research material without bumping an old thread isn't that difficult.  The Mods have even been good enough to put the suggestion of starting a new thread and linking the old one in the FAQ.  I think where people have difficulty is that they don't read the information that's provided.



It's all right but on that point we really do disagree.

I agree with you that it's two different things. But when someone wants to open a new discussion on certain topics, they are prone to taking crap for it. For some, I really can understand - it's not like we are lacking in "wah, I never get answers to my messages", but others sometimes I really do go "Well... they weren't here for the last discussion and they would like to say their piece. They can't bump the dead thread and they get fussed at for making a new one. Jesus... "

I still think you are amazing even if we disagree. [:)]



LadyPact -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 1:41:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub
It's all right but on that point we really do disagree.

I agree with you that it's two different things. But when someone wants to open a new discussion on certain topics, they are prone to taking crap for it. For some, I really can understand - it's not like we are lacking in "wah, I never get answers to my messages", but others sometimes I really do go "Well... they weren't here for the last discussion and they would like to say their piece. They can't bump the dead thread and they get fussed at for making a new one. Jesus... "

I still think you are amazing even if we disagree. [:)]

Thanks!  You know I feel the same way about you.  [:)]

I think at times it comes from just over excitement.  They want to talk with people about it so much that they may not realize that the person they are talking to isn't here anymore.



BonesFromAsh -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 1:48:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz
I wish you hadn't asked that - there's a real danger of thread hi-jack.


You aren't the first person to say that to me [;)] and there's no danger of thread hijacking on my part...the last thing I need is the OP cross with me.

Thank you, though, for braving the flame-throwers to answer my question. It was an honest one as I was trying to understand your connecting the words as you presented them with the topic at hand.




Rule -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 3:01:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss
For CM, what are the norms as you see them

I put anyone who gets me into trouble with a Mod on Hide. I also put on Hide people who use illegible font, people who are malevolent or obnoxious or have bad taste, and infrequently people who have less than two hundred posts as those might get me into trouble with a Mod, and very infrequently someone who gives me a feeling of natural antipathy.



sunshinemiss -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 4:13:55 PM)

So, I went to sleep last night and woke up (Yay!) this morning to all these great replies.  Thanks folks.  Now, coffee.  I think every thread should mention two things:

1.  Coffee.
2.  Alan Rickman.

Have a great day!
sunshine



thornhappy -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 5:22:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub
~Fast Reply~

And there is definately a bit of a damned if you do, damn if you don't situation with "search for previous threads but don't bump them".

Have to disagree with you here, Aqua.  It's two entirely different things.  Reading research material without bumping an old thread isn't that difficult.  The Mods have even been good enough to put the suggestion of starting a new thread and linking the old one in the FAQ.  I think where people have difficulty is that they don't read the information that's provided.

I'd be embarrassed to tell all y'all just how long it took me to notice the Search function.  It's in a small font, in a group of things in equally small font on the upper right side of the page.  I just don't notice things as much if they're on the upper right of a page.

Another problem is with a search that returns a "mega-thread".  How many pages, and how many threads, are people expected to read?  I don't mind reading and research but I bet that as a new user I'd still get busted, especially with long-term site users.



littlewonder -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 5:43:05 PM)

personally I don't see any norms at all except that everyone is here because they're into bdsm in one form or another in whatever way they decide to describe it in their life. Otherwise it's a big giant mishmash of confusion and chaos.



Kaliko -> RE: :: CM Etiquette :: (11/8/2010 6:08:47 PM)

one resounding norm:

Quite a few people on the board tend to rip apart others who haven't done the search function before opening up a topic. I've been here under a few different profiles for a few years and I have to say that I still rather enjoy seeing new conversation on old topics. Why can't a new group of people have a conversation on the boards about something that a longer residing group of people have already have? I consider it to be like perusing profiles. If you don't like a profile, move on. Same with the boards. If you don't like the topic because you're tired of hearing about it, then move on. No one is forcing you to partake in the discussion. Not everyone is tired of hearing about it and there's no reason to knock down the OP because of it. Sometimes I feel like I want to hold out my hand and help the OP up off the floor and tell them to never mind the roomful o'cranky.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125