RE: mechanised bondage

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: mechanised bondage

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Bondage Gear and Apparel >> RE: mechanised bondage

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: mechanised bondage - 1/9/2011 6:33:27 AM

xssve

Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

Ah, a gimbal, of course, brain fart - I do like the idea of mechanization, however, as I say, I tend to think of more in terms of say an articulated platform, to control the incline of the torso and/or hips of a bound subject, rather than attaching limbs to it - even an articulated spreader could result in sprains and muscle tears if the subject is not very flexible, you really need to be careful with that, I wouldn't do anything the subject cannot do without mechanical aid - my sister snapped tendons in her knee just raising her leg to climb on a bicycle, she was a swimmer, and the flutter kick might have something to do with that, but realize it doesn't always take much.

As for the gimbal, you could probably design a suspension device using nylon straps and possibly steel water pipe (see Hammock chairs) with these properties, depending on how high your ceilings are and how much room you have, and it wouldn't need to be mechanically articulated - unless she's a hefty babe, and you need a winch to get her off the ground.

Probably need to climb up in the attic, and use a cross member perpendicular to the ceiling joists to better distribute the load, to avoid cracking the plaster, and/or a lag bolt pulling out for any suspension application.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: mechanised bondage - 1/13/2011 4:00:41 PM

randstad

Posts: 37
Joined: 8/15/2005
Status: offline

Read about a chastity device with a build-in plug that had an device in it that could register the position the wearer's body.
It also had an electro stim element, batteries and all, and gave very strong pulses when the wearer was standing up, and slowed down as soon as tthe wearer assumed another position, for example kneeled, or was bent over really deep.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: mechanised bondage - 1/30/2011 5:18:33 PM

bomberocito

Posts: 5
Joined: 5/30/2010
Status: offline

Hello - take a look of my sleeping-bench
- comming soon: breast massager (ebay china)
- orgasmus controll: each hand an 3 position switch to be hold in the middle-position
                                      - lost contact breast discharge
                                      - middle position vibrator on
                                      - full pressed     anal-discharge voltage

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/9/2011 9:39:42 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

Sorry I've neglected this thread a bit. It got boubced down a bit......

You have a sick evil mind. Welcome !

So you're talking about something two electric wheelchair controls ? Without the spring return to the center of course. A shorter "throttling range" of course. Don't want it to be too easy. And hopefully you mean by lost contaact, the spring mechanism would take it to the ZZAP end.

I can do that I bet. Of course while occupied with the device, out of your reach could be some "sensitivity" adjustments which would make the position of the switch more critical. (yes I believe that was the correct choice of words) The Mistress could turn the screws to make it if you even move a half a millimeter ZZAP.

MWAHAHAHAHAHA

(in reply to bomberocito)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/11/2011 12:04:45 PM

LoveSlider

Posts: 52
Joined: 8/22/2010
Status: offline

An electric wheelchair controller is simply a potentiometer, 3 wires go back to the control unit. Nothing you need to nick from a wheelchair or mobility scooter they are a few pence.

Hydraulics would be fine if you could simply limit their range of motion, perhaps by the stroke and length of the actuators used, to a range which is unlikely to break anything.
But they're messy. Maybe pneumatics would be good, then you've got control of the force applied by regulating pressure, but at the expense of not having control of displacement.

Steam would have all the drawbacks of air, but for adding mood would be cooler than penguin piss. Not sure if anyone else is into the whole steampunk thing but I'd love a steam driven "torture engine". muahaha.

< Message edited by LoveSlider -- 2/11/2011 12:09:38 PM >

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/11/2011 10:52:49 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

Not true. It is an optical encoder, like the volume knob on a car stereo that can go round and round forever. Just a different patter and function.

Doesn't matter anyway, the hysteresis of the switches, if set "too" tight might result in both shocks at the same time. That'll teachem !

T^T

(in reply to LoveSlider)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/12/2011 4:09:16 AM

LoveSlider

Posts: 52
Joined: 8/22/2010
Status: offline

Maybe you have worked on more expensive wheelchairs than me :P

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/12/2011 10:34:27 AM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

I'm just going to put some mustard on my crow. I haven't worked on electric wheelchairs, but a bunch of other electronics. Potentiometers are so out of style that I was sure they would use optical encoders for many reasons. My bad I guess.

Steam powered ? LOL ! Of course that is pretty much pneumatic really. The lack of the absolute brute force of hydraulics might be a better approach. Of course steam would keep the device warm :-). The proper design of the controls and valves could make electronics unnecessary.

I'm still surprised to learn that they use simple pots in wheelchairs. For such an application, an optical encoder would be easy to use without a complex digital interface. I wonder if the engineers had their heads up their ass or if there is valid reason. There are few applications these days that require a potentiometer, and I don't see those reasons here.

But back to the subject. ( pun ? ) An evil mind is a terrible thing to waste.

T^T

(in reply to LoveSlider)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/12/2011 11:13:01 AM

bomberocito

Posts: 5
Joined: 5/30/2010
Status: offline

Hello!

did you know how the water-control of the washing-mashine works? An membrane-switch close at diferent presure several contacts. You need only a enema-baloon and an tube to the diferential-switch. If the slave press at certain force will close or open diferent switches.
also can make hold open or closed legs or mouth.
Now you can combine one hand with the inflatable gagg and the other hand with the inflatable buttplug.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/15/2011 11:48:01 AM

LoveSlider

Posts: 52
Joined: 8/22/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

I'm just going to put some mustard on my crow. I haven't worked on electric wheelchairs, but a bunch of other electronics. Potentiometers are so out of style that I was sure they would use optical encoders for many reasons. My bad I guess.

But back to the subject. ( pun ? ) An evil mind is a terrible thing to waste.

T^T

Too many companies in far east all ripping off each other every week. Probably ripping off their own designs from a few years before!

Have a look at chimera bondage, they have some cool powered spankers and such. There was a great one with a girl locking herself in a fucking machine, with timed cuffs but she could accelerate the timer by taking an anal plug and sucking another. They were using door security magnets for cuffs, and what looks like exactly same linear actuators you can get in the riser/recliner armchairs.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: mechanised bondage - 2/17/2011 2:48:32 AM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

You'll probably have to extract what you want me to see from that site. I'm in no mood for another membership.

Y'know, I was wondering, given the topic, if anyone considered orthopedic appliances as such.

I also have a picture of a person wearing that thing, but I don't feel like messing with TOS or USC2257.

T^T