|
kalikshama -> RE: Mistress looking (12/20/2010 5:09:26 PM)
|
quote:
And what exactly would be wrong with learning to dominate someone, or have the skills to while in highschool? Does being in highschool automatically mean you are not capable of, or can not learn stuff?
Is there some magical prevention charm at the school, or something that makes doing both un believeable and there for worth scoffing at?
Young people, and those who're 18 and over but still in highschool are not automatically incapable of being a dominant. Being a dominant to me, is part of who you are, your personality, what you do. It's not to do with age, or anything else.
Now good skills and being well known may come later but as fas as I am concerned, there's no agelimit or timeline for being a dominant..
I agree that there's no age limit for having a dominant personality. However, being a skilled Dom/Domme takes practice, which takes time.
It is my personal preference to play with very experienced, highly skilled people, for whom I have a deep appreciation.
10,000 Hours To Develop Talent
In the book Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell studied the “outliers” – i.e., the most successful people of the world, including sportsmen, business people, musicians and scientists, to understand key factors behind their success. He found the key denominator to all their success isn’t natural aptitude as many like to believe. Having a high IQ doesn’t guarantee success : There is supposedly no difference in people’s propensity to success beyond an IQ of 130.
The key denominator is actually hard work. A lot of it, in fact. About 10,000 hours of it. That’s roughly 3 hours every day, for 10 consecutive years, before any one of them began to be defined as the ‘expert’ in their field.
|
|
|
|
